
190 episodes

SCOTUS 101 Heritage Podcast Network
-
- News
-
-
4.6 • 442 Ratings
-
A Heritage Foundation podcast breaking down what's happening at the Supreme Court, what the justices are up to, and more.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
-
Judge Kyle Duncan Talks About Stanford
In this episode your hosts discuss the amusing oral arguments in the Jack Daniels parody case and unpack the one opinion of the week. Judge Kyle Duncan also joins the show to talk about the recent free-speech debacle at Stanford Law School. He explains what happened, reflects on its implications for the legal profession, on the proper purpose of law school, and offers some thoughts about how we might cultivate a more civil environment.Trivia this week focuses on fundamental principles free-speech law.
Here is Judge Duncan's article in the Wall Street Journal.
Follow us on Twitter @scotus101 and @tzsmith. And please send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to scotus101@heritage.org.
Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. -
Rehearing: Judge Stephen Vaden
In this Rehearings episode, we replay our interview with the Judge Stephen Vaden. The interview is especially relevant in light of the recent free-speech controversy at Stanford Law, because Judge Vaden talks about the free-speech crisis in legal academia. Rehearings airs our favorite old interviews on weeks when things are otherwise quiet at the Supreme Court.
Follow us on Twitter @scotus101 and @tzsmith. And please send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to scotus101@heritage.org.
Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating.
Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. -
Rehearing: Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod
In this Rehearings episode, we replay our interview with the Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod. Rehearings airs our favorite old interviews on weeks when things are otherwise quiet at the Supreme Court.
Follow us on Twitter @scotus101 and @tzsmith. And please send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to scotus101@heritage.org.
Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating.
Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. -
Student Loans and Major Questions
Oral arguments in the cases challenging President Biden's student loan cancellation plan dominated the news this week while other interesting SCOTUS developments flew under the radar. Zack discusses the opinions you may have missed, while GianCarlo does a deep dive into those oral arguments. With administrative law front-and-center this week, GianCarlo interviews an expert on the subject, Professor Chad Squitieri of the Columbus School of Law at The Catholic University of America. The two discuss the Major Questions Doctrine and Catholic University's Project on Constitutional Originalism and the Catholic Intellectual Tradition. Last up, Zack does a good job stumping GianCarlo with trivia about the prior careers of famous Justices.
Here is a link to Professor Squitieri's article, Major Problems with Major Questions.
And here is a link to Zack's article about New York v. New Jersey.
Follow us on Twitter @scotus101 and @tzsmith. And please send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to scotus101@heritage.org.
Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating.
Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. -
A Dubious Expediency
The Court is back, and this week it heard oral arguments in two high-profile cases against Google and Twitter that will decide the extent of the protection they can claim when their users support terrorism. It also issued opinions in a bankruptcy case, a capital-murder case, and a fair-wage case. After covering those developments, GianCarlo interviews Professor Gail Heriot of the University of San Diego School of Law. The two talk about her research on racial preferences and what it means for the Harvard and UNC cases and the future of racial preferences after those cases are decided. Lastly, GianCarlo hits Zack with some cinematic SCOTUS trivia.
You can find a copy of Professor Heriot's book here: A Dubious Expediency.
Follow us on Twitter @scotus101 and @tzsmith. And please send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to scotus101@heritage.org.
Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating.
Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. -
Rehearing: Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk
In this Rehearings episode, we replay our interview with the Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk. Rehearings airs our favorite old interviews on weeks when things are otherwise quiet at the Supreme Court.
Follow us on Twitter @scotus101 and @tzsmith. And please send questions, comments, or ideas for future episodes to scotus101@heritage.org.
Don't forget to leave a 5-star rating.
Stay caffeinated and opinionated with a SCOTUS 101 mug.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Customer Reviews
Washington Journal Wow!!!
So pumped to hear you on CSpan during my morning commute! Extra SCOTUS 102 this morning!
Good Insight into Legal Right
I recommend this podcast to understand legal commentary and arguments from the right, especially with the current composition of the Supreme Court. Pair this with another legal podcast (e.g., Strict Scrutiny) to get a well-rounded perspective. The interviews with judges and figures in the legal community are also informative and provide insight that you don’t get elsewhere. HOWEVER, the “Rehearing” episodes replaying old interviews is just lazy. The interviews are already available and “Rehearing” does not add anything. It is a missed opportunity to provide new commentary or interviews.
Real Pros
GC and Zack know their stuff! Brilliant lawyers but humble and fun to listen to. Best objective review of cases before the High Court and fascinating interviews.