39 episodes

Looking for smart policy ideas for a growing world? Subscribe to the Mercatus Policy Download for all policy, no punditry, and a path forward.

Looking to connect with a scholar you heard on the Download? Email Kate De Lanoy of our Media team at kdelanoy@mercatus.gmu.edu.

Here's to growth!

Mercatus Policy Download Mercatus Center

    • News
    • 4.9, 20 Ratings

Looking for smart policy ideas for a growing world? Subscribe to the Mercatus Policy Download for all policy, no punditry, and a path forward.

Looking to connect with a scholar you heard on the Download? Email Kate De Lanoy of our Media team at kdelanoy@mercatus.gmu.edu.

Here's to growth!

    How to Address Regulations Suspended During the COVID-19 Crisis

    How to Address Regulations Suspended During the COVID-19 Crisis

    Attempting to mitigate the spread of COVID-19, policymakers at the federal, state, and local levels are suspending or rescinding laws and regulations that hinder timely, sensible responses to the pandemic. The temporary departure from these rules is causing many to question the need to reinstate them post-crisis. A diverse cross-section of scholars has written on why this is an important time to evaluate whether or not some of these regulations are really beneficial and how policymakers can best make these assessments. This co-sponsored webinar will provide viewers with a grounded, non-partisan approach for doing so. The Mercatus Center published a policy brief, part of the COVID-19 Response series, that proposes an approach called a Fresh Start Initiative. The Progressive Policy Institute has consistently proposed an approach to regulations that could foster more growth coming out of the pandemic while still protecting people and the environment.
     
    Check out the Mercatus Center's research on the topic here and PPI's research here.
     
    Want to tune in to a future webinar? Email the Mercatus Center Outreach team at mercatusoutreach@mercatus.gmu.edu.
     
    Interested in hearing more content like this on the download? Please reach out to dfloer@mercatus.gmu.edu. 
     
    If you'd like to get in touch with a Mercatus Scholar featured on the download, please reach out to Matthew Boyer at mboyer@mercatus.gmu.edu. 

    • 45 min
    Trade Wars, Tariffs, Impeachment Proceedings and their Impact in 2020

    Trade Wars, Tariffs, Impeachment Proceedings and their Impact in 2020

    Welcome back!
    On today’s episode, Mercatus scholar Matthew Mitchell and Mercatus Distinguished Adjunct Fellow, Bruce Yandle, discuss the recent hot button topics flooding the current news headlines and their influence heading into the 2020 presidential election.
    What will be the economic impacts of the trade wars and Trump's tariffs? Who's really losing when it comes to paying for these tariffs? What do the Trump impeachment proceedings mean for the economy? Matt and Bruce sit down to discuss these questions and much more.
    And to end their conversation on a lighter note, Matt and Bruce also share stories about Bruce's grandson Adam Smith and discuss some books they hope to see in their stockings this holiday season.
    Check out Bruce Yandle's December 2019 Economic Situation Report here and to learn more about the latest research at Mercatus, please visit The Bridge.
    Want to get in touch with one of our scholars featured on the Download? Email Kate De Lanoy at kdelanoy@mercatus.gmu.edu. 

    • 39 min
    Interpreting CDA Section 230 and its Future

    Interpreting CDA Section 230 and its Future

    We're back to bring you a special episode on CDA Section 230 or, as one of our guests put it “the 26 words that created the Internet."
    This law paved the way for the explosion of Facebook, YouTube, and numerous other internet companies by protecting them from being held liable for what users say and do on their platforms. This also allowed each platform the freedom to develop its own content moderation standards.
    But, as these platforms have grown larger and central to public discourse, some are worried that section 230 gives tech companies far too much influence in who can say what.
    So, is 230 due for a reform? And if so, how?
    To unpack this topic further, Mercatus Scholar Brian Knight hosts today's episode. 
    In addition, we're joined by Jennifer Huddleston, Research Fellow at the Mercatus Center, whose research involves tech policy and law, Jeff Kosseff, Assistant Professor of Cybersecurity Law at the United States Naval Academy, Cyber Science Department, and the author of The 26 Words That Created The Internet, and finally, Adam Candeub, a professor of law and the Director of the Intellectual Property, Information, and Communications Law program at Michigan State University.
    Want to get in touch with one of our scholars featured on the Download? Email Kate De Lanoy at kdelanoy@mercatus.gmu.edu. 
    Today's What's on Tap beverage is Rhinegeist Brewery's Bubbles Rose' Ale from Cincinnati, Ohio.

    • 53 min
    The Future of Healthcare: Medicare for All and Beyond

    The Future of Healthcare: Medicare for All and Beyond

    Few words are more politically and emotionally charged in Washington than “healthcare.” Just as the Affordable Care Act was hitting a decade or so of nearly continuous debate, so-called Medicare for All proposals have become the latest battleground for healthcare policy wonks.
    Even beneath those big picture headline debates, other, smaller questions swirl around the healthcare world, including issues like prescription drug prices.
    We'd probably bet that the looming 2020 election season isn’t going to do much to end the country’s existential debate on what healthcare should look like, meaning these fights aren’t going away anytime soon.
    But that doesn’t mean we can’t make some progress, or at least shed a little light on them.
    Here to do that, we're joined by a couple of healthcare policy experts.
    First up, Tara O’Neill Hayes, Deputy Director of Health Care Policy at the American Action Forum. Tara’s work focuses on health insurance costs and coverage, including Medicare, Medicaid, and all the other issues that come along with it. Tara also spent some time as a Congressional staffer covering healthcare and budget issues.
    Next, we're pleased to welcome back to the show Bob Graboyes. The last time we caught up with Bob we were talking about medical drones, so we’re glad he’s back to both continue and broaden out that discussion a bit. Bob is a Senior Research Fellow and healthcare scholar here at Mercatus, and has years of experience researching and teaching the economics of healthcare.
    As we say goodbye to our host Chad, we want to hear from you! Email our producer Dallas at dfloer@mercatus.gmu.edu with your feedback on why you want the show to continue, how the show has helped you understand a particular topic better, or any general feedback on why you love the show. Our inboxes are open and we're ready to hear what you have to say.
    Today's What's on Tap beer features New Belgium Brewing's Passion Fruit Kolsch.
    You can continue to keep up with Chad on Twitter @ChadMReese.
    Thanks for listening. Cheers!

    • 38 min
    Does Federal Debt Hurt the Economy More Than We Thought?

    Does Federal Debt Hurt the Economy More Than We Thought?

    While it sometimes feels like a lifetime ago, it was just back in August of 2011 that Standard & Poor’s downgraded the United States’ credit rating from AAA to AA+. Since then, concerns about US federal debt have gotten less and less attention with each passing year even as debt itself continued to rise.
    For context, we think the number the last time we checked was just north of $22 trillion, while the federal deficit was just shy of a trillion dollars.
    But should we even care?
    After all, the US seems to have shouldered high levels of debt for a long time, and aside from the 2011 credit downgrade, doesn’t appear to have obviously suffered for it. Some proponents of a new idea called “Modern Monetary Theory” or MMT for short, even argue that as long as the Federal Reserve is around, US deficit spending is largely irrelevant.
    Here to talk about what US debt actually means for taxpayers and policymakers, we’re joined by two excellent guests.
    Tom Grennes joins us on the phone. Tom is a Professor of Economics Emeritus at North Carolina State, and author of a recent Mercatus paper on this topic titled “New Evidence on Debt as an obstacle to US Economic Growth" featuring his co-authors Mehmet Caner and Michael Fan.
    We have Kate Davidson here in the studio with us. Kate is a reporter for the Wall Street Journal covering the Federal Reserve and US economy from the Journal’s Washington Bureau, and before that she covered bank regulation and policy for Politico and American Banker.
    Follow Chad on Twitter at @ChadMReese.
    Today's What's on Tap beverage features Union Craft Brewing's Duckpin Pale Ale from Baltimore, Maryland.

    • 29 min
    Auer Deference and Administrative Law

    Auer Deference and Administrative Law

    Deference is one of those magical words in the world of regulatory policy. Different types of deference play a huge role in how courts and federal agencies interact when it comes to deciding cases, and those cases in turn help shape federal policy on everything from healthcare to financial markets to environmental protection.
    We say that upfront, because we’re about to dip our toes in the waters of administrative law, that’s the branch of law that deals with how regulations are made, and Chad's the only non-lawyer here at the table. So he reserves the right to interrupt and ask for clarifications as we go.
    That said, we’re here today to talk about Kisor v. Wilkie, a case currently before the US Supreme Court. On paper, this is a case about the Department of Veterans’ Affairs decision to deny a veteran benefits. James Kisor is the veteran, and Robert Wilkie is the Secretary of the VA.
    But as with any case before the Supreme Court, more is at stake here than just the people named in the individual case, and here to explain why this case matters and what we know about it so far are two regulatory legal experts.
    First, we're happy to welcome back to the show Jennifer Huddleston. Jennifer is a scholar here at Mercatus whose work often focuses on the intersection between technology and regulation. She’s been on the Download here before to talk about transportation innovation as well as data privacy.
    Second, from all the way on the other side of the building, we’re joined by Adam White. Adam is the Executive Director of the C. Boyden Gray Center for the Study of the Administrative State here at George Mason University’s Antonin Scalia Law School. He’s also a law professor there and wears a handful of other academic and policy hats.
    Follow Chad on Twitter @ChadMReese.
    Check out the Bridge for all Mercatus research, all the time.
    Love the show? Give us a rating on Apple Podcasts! It helps other podcasts listeners find the show.
    Today's What's on Tap beverage is brought to you by Devil's Backbone Brewing Company in Lexington, Virginia.

    • 35 min

Customer Reviews

4.9 out of 5
20 Ratings

20 Ratings

Yobolight ,

Fantastic Analyses

Really great stuff. Sad that Chad is moving on, but I hope the podcast continues.

Jabittan ,

Here's to an Excellent and Insightful Policy Podcast

The Mercatus Policy Download should be part of everyone's regular policy download if they are interested in public policy and expanding their understanding of today's political and policy world. The starting segment of "What's on Tap" highlights the things going on at Mercatus with some fun beer judging. The interviews take challenging economic thought and work through current thoughts and approaches to better understand our world in a way that is accessible and encourages deeper thought.

Top Podcasts In News

Listeners Also Subscribed To