1,406 episodes
The Intelligence from The Economist The Economist
-
- News
-
-
4.5 • 2.3K Ratings
-
Get a daily burst of illumination from The Economist’s worldwide network of correspondents. Our reporters dig past the headlines to get to the stories beneath—and to stories that aren’t making headlines, but should be. A unique perspective on the issues and events shaping your world.
Sign up for Economist Podcasts+ at http://www.economist.com/podcastsplus-intelligence.
If you’re already a subscriber to The Economist, you’ll have full access to all our shows as part of your subscription.
For more information about Economist Podcasts+, including how to get access, please visit our FAQs page at https://myaccount.economist.com/s/article/What-is-Economist-Podcasts
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
-
The Weekend Intelligence: Capturing UFOs
When a story about UFOs came across the desk of The Economist’s Michelle Hennessy, she was sceptical. A powerful cultural legacy of flying saucers and aliens is hard to ignore. But a recent flurry of interest from U.S defence agencies and NASA, stress the serious and scientific task of shedding light on what’s happening in the skies above.
Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—Subscribe to Economist Podcasts+
For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. -
The Weekend Intelligence: Capturing UFOs
When a story about UFOs came across the desk of The Economist’s Michelle Hennessy, she was sceptical. A powerful cultural legacy of flying saucers and aliens is hard to ignore. But a recent flurry of interest from U.S defence agencies and NASA, stress the serious and scientific task of shedding light on what’s happening in the skies above.
Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—Subscribe to Economist Podcasts+
For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account. -
The Intelligence: Our meeting with Macron
France’s president is known for pronouncements of grand scope with one eye toward history. But when our journalists visited him at his residence his assessment of the state of the world was bleak—a dark, prophetic call to arms. In this special episode, we ask whether his view is accurate, whether his proposed solutions would work and whether he is the person to enact them.
Read the full transcript of our interview here.
Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+. For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. -
The Intelligence: The kids are alright, turns out
When you look around the world, and at a wider set of measures, Generation Z are far better off than the popular narrative would have you believe. We examine what India’s push to soup up its nukes means for the global arms race (09:30). And even as global fertility rates fall, sub-Saharan Africa is experiencing a relative baby boom (17:11).
Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+. For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. -
The Intelligence: Going back to raid school
A dramatic overnight raid in New York City was just one sign that protests at American universities are set to continue—a clear historical echo in an already-fraught election year. We ask why a niche newspaper run by Japan’s communist party has so much influence (13:05). And a study of new books on loneliness reveals both the benefits and drawbacks of solitude (20:39).
Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+. For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information. -
The Intelligence: Dengue’s grip on Latin America
The dengue-fever case counts now break regional records every year—and the structural reasons behind the spike suggest this sometimes-deadly virus will soon threaten more of the world. Breaches and security holes keep revealing how much of the internet’s innards are maintained by volunteers; we ask why (09:45). And the case for moving over, not up, at work (17:10).
Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+. For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Customer Reviews
Please bring back John. Please.
This is one of the best podcast. Nothing else fills my drive to work than this podcast. Thank you for all your the hard work. Jason is awesome and his voice fills my day. I miss John. Please bring back John. Together John and Jason brought maturity to the podcast which was awesome. Ore needs training. Her immaturity is killing the show. Please train Ore more and then she can try again. But do not spoil it any further. I tried to continue listening hoping that her voice and interview skill will improve over time but I could not any more. If Jason is not there I just could not continue. When Ore starts the show I shut it down. No offense though. Jason is awesome and it is for him I am continuing. One of the primary reason for not subscribing to podcast+ is Ore. Thank you.
Use to be straight down the middle, not anymore
I typically look to the economist for fair, unbiased, and agenda-free content. This podcast use to be excellent at that. However, the new cohost makes her political agenda clear, which means it likely influences the editorial selections. I now consider this just another partisan news source.
Too often editorials, not news
I don’t know if intended but this podcast often has more in common with the leaders in the magazine (editorials) than news. An example is their podcast on May 1 about Columbia and the issues on college campuses. It was a very long editorial disguised as news. The podcast should have accurately distinguished between news and editorial.
They accepted as a given that universities must negotiate with people who break university rules en masse, break into buildings, etc vs enforce their rules. There was also no mention of the fact that the students protesting at Columbia forced a shut down of in person classes and had a number of reported alleged incidents (even away from breaking into building) involving anti semitism or vandalism. It appears these omissions were made because they would not fit the editorial narrative of the podcast.
I also note that a number of the things the commentator stated as fact in terms of how universities have addressed freedom of speech in other situations are disputed by many. I suggest the writers of the podcast read the reports of FIRE on free speech at colleges and universities. I also suggest they read the letter President Eisgruber at Princeton wrote to the student paper (The Daily Princetonian) or review the Chicago Principles set forth by the University of Chicago as a model of how a college or university might approach speech and protests on campus consistently. To quote Chicago President Alivisatos, the school will act to protect “even expressions of viewpoints that some find deeply offensive” but draws a line at actions “that block the learning or expression of others … [or] disrupts the functioning or safety of the University.”
Another issue the podcast ignored is that to many colleges and universities are allowing speech vs Jews that would simply not be tolerated with regard to many other groups (whether defined by race, religion or ethnicity). From this perspective the problems faced by colleges and universities are in part the price for not enforcing rules equally.
I hope this podcast is not a harbinger of the breakdown in objective news reporting by the Economist.