The Karen Read Murder Trial: Canton Confidential NBC10 Boston
-
- True Crime
-
Nightly coverage of the Karen Read murder trial and her allegations of a cover-up over the killing of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe.
-
Day 20 | How was Karen Read's headlight damaged?
Today we heard more testimony about Karen Read’s tail light. Plus, surveillance video concerning the number of drinks she may have had before driving, and testimony from a key state police investigator who worked on the case.
-
In review | A deep dive into the weather conditions affecting the case
We take an in-depth look at the weather conditions when John O’Keefe’s body was found - plus, how the Karen Read trial has drawn a worldwide audience.
-
Day 19 | Case turns to physical evidence, including broken taillight
Jurors in the murder trial of Karen Read returned to the courtroom Monday for a full day of testimony as the prosecution turned to physical forensic evidence in the case.
-
In review | Discarded cell phones, butt dials, blood alcohol levels and more
We take a look back at what happened in court from Tuesday, May 28, which included discussion of discarded phones and butt dials, Karen Read's blood alcohol level, and testimony from John O'Keefe's niece and nephew.
-
Digital extra |The significance of Karen Read’s blood alcohol levels
Katherine Loftus joins NBC10 Boston’s Glenn Jones to discuss testimony in the Karen Read murder trial, including what we heard from doctors and a forensic toxicologist about the amount of alcohol in Read’s system the morning of John O’Keefe’s death, her thoughts on Brian Higgins' disposal of his cell phone, and more.
-
Day 18 | Jury hears from John O'Keefe's niece and nephew
In the only day of court this week, we heard testimony about Karen Read's reported blood-alcohol level on the day of John O'Keefe's death, and defense attorneys continued to grill ATF Agent Brian Higgins over his phone records.
Customer Reviews
I appreciate this podcast but…
Great recap of every court date for us who can’t watch them live. However the guest was VERY biased towards the prosecution
Weird interpretation of the trial
At times I’m wondering if the commentators are watching the same trial as I am. The opinions seem rather glossy. The commentators lack the ability to report on apparent untruths that witnesses are testifying. No comment is made when the witnesses change their testimony.