The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up‪)‬ Niall Boylan

Guests:
Linda De Courcy Independent Ireland Candidate For Clondalkin LEA
William Carton Independent Ireland Candidate For Athy LEA
Ryan McKeown Independent Ireland Candidate For Clane LEA
Collette Byrne Independent Ireland Candidate For Portlaoise LEA
Description:
In this episode, Niall is getting the reaction of listeners to Tent City Deja Vu. Approximately 100 tents occupied by asylum seekers were removed from Dublin’s Grand Canal this morning for the third time this month. The multi-agency operation aimed to move occupants to alternative accommodation, with buses ready to transport them. The government stated that new beds have become available in Citywest and other locations across the country, easing the pressure on Dublin.
This recurring issue has sparked debate about the government's priorities. While the government claims that these moves are necessary to provide better facilities and reduce pressure on the city, critics argue that resources are being diverted from pressing issues affecting Irish citizens.
Niall opens up the lines to callers.
Some callers are fed up with the government prioritizing migrants over its own citizens. They argue that many Irish people are homeless and struggling, yet the government continues to allocate resources to asylum seekers. They believe the government needs to focus on the needs of the Irish people first, improving healthcare, making housing affordable, and addressing the struggles of taxpayers before spending on migrant camps.
Niall wraps up by highlighting the debate and differing opinions on how the government is handling the asylum seeker situation in relation to the needs of Irish citizens.

In this episode, Niall is asking, "Do you agree with military conscription for unemployed 18-year-olds?" This discussion stems from a proposal by the Conservatives to reintroduce mandatory national service, offering military placements or community service to young people. The plan aims to foster national spirit and provide valuable skills, but it has faced criticism for its potential costs and impact on personal freedom.
Some callers fully support the idea, believing it will instill discipline, provide valuable skills, and divert young people from crime and unemployment. They see it as a way to foster national pride and unity, with benefits extending to public services like the NHS and fire services.
Other callers oppose the idea, viewing mandatory service as a violation of personal freedom and arguing that funds would be better spent on improving education and job opportunities. They criticize the proposal as an unfunded measure that could strain the economy and fail to address the root causes of unemployment.
Niall wraps up by highlighting the debate over the benefits and drawbacks of mandatory national service for unemployed youth.

In this episode, Niall explores the question, "Can Ireland Remain Neutral in a Changing World?" Ireland's longstanding policy of neutrality faces scrutiny amidst its support for international humanitarian efforts and use of Shannon Airport by the US military. With significant financial aid to Ukraine and involvement in EU defense initiatives, callers debate whether Ireland's neutrality is viable in today's geopolitical landscape.
Some callers argue that Ireland's neutrality is a cornerstone of its foreign policy, promoting peacekeeping and humanitarian aid without military alignment. They believe neutrality allows Ireland to maintain its identity and diplomatic relations while mediating global conflicts peacefully.
Others contend that Ireland's actions, such as supporting Ukraine and hosting US military operations, compromise its claim to neutrality. They suggest that in today's interconnected world, true neutrality is impractical, urging Ireland to acknowledge its alliances and commitments openly. They argue that maintaining a facade of neutrality undermines credibility and transparency in foreign policy.
Niall summarizes the diverse viewpoints, emphasizing the challenges and importance of reevaluating Ireland's stance amidst evolving global dynamics. He thanks the callers for their perspectives and encourages listeners to continue exploring this complex issue.

In this episode, Niall asks, "Do you think moving refugees from the tents at the canal to larger fields with bigger tents and services is a good idea?" With plans to relocate asylum seekers to more organized camps at sites like Thornton Hall, opinions are divided on whether this is a humane solution or a misallocation of resources.
Some callers think moving refugees from the tents at the canal to larger fields with bigger tents and better services is a more humane approach. They argue that providing refugees with essential services such as healthcare, sanitation, and security is the least that can be done for those who have fled terrible situations. This move is seen as a step toward treating refugees with dignity and compassion.
While other callers feel that expanding services for refugees is not feasible given Ireland's current struggles with homelessness, healthcare shortages, and rising living costs. They believe the government should prioritize its own citizens' needs and that redirecting funds to refugee services takes away from vital resources needed by the local population.
Niall summarizes the diverse opinions, highlighting the need to balance compassion for refugees with the practical challenges faced by the country. He thanks the callers for their insights and encourages listeners to continue the conversation.

In this episode, Niall is asking, "Should Ireland Reinstate Border Checks Between The North And South?" Recently, Gardaí sent migrants back to the North on one-way train tickets, prompting a discussion on whether border checkpoints could help control illegal immigration. With an estimated 30,000 migrants expected this year, opinions are divided on the effectiveness and implications of such measures.
Some callers think reinstating border checks is essential to manage illegal immigration and enhance security. They believe it would help control the flow of migrants and prevent the entry of illegal items, ensuring a secure and orderly process for asylum seekers.
Others feel reinstating border checks would be a step backward, undermining progress since the Good Friday Agreement and disrupting daily life for those near the border. They suggest improving immigration processes and cooperation with Northern Ireland and the UK instead.
Niall summarizes the diverse opinions and suggests that while some see border checks as a solution, it's crucial to consider broader social and political implications. He thanks the callers for their insights and encourages listeners to continue the conversation.

In this episode, Niall asks, "Is Income Tax Relief for Moms a Birthrate Solution?" Inspired by Hungary’s 2019 policy, which exempts women with four or more children from paying income tax, Niall examines whether a similar approach could increase Ireland's birth rate.
Some callers think offering income tax relief for mothers could be a great incentive to boost the birth rate in Ireland. Hungary's policy shows that it's a practical way to support families financially and encourage larger families. Raising children is expensive, and this kind of relief can significantly ease the financial burden. It also acknowledges the value of motherhood and the effort that goes into raising the next generation. One caller noted, "Income tax relief for moms could be a game-changer for Ireland. It would not only encourage higher birth rates but also help address demographic challenges like an aging population. Many young couples delay having children due to financial concerns, and this kind of policy could make a big difference."
While other callers are against the idea. They argue that tax relief for moms might not be fair to everyone. What about families who can't have children or choose not to for various reasons? This policy could create inequality and resentment among those who don't benefit from it. They suggest that the government should instead invest in creating a more supportive environment for all families, regardless of the number of children they have.
Niall summarizes the diverse opinions and suggests that while income tax relief for mothers could boost birth rates, it is essential to consider the broader implications and potential inequalities. He thanks the callers for their insights and encourages listeners to keep the conversation going.