Insurers in Difficulty: Staying Compliant Under Solvency II

When U.K. insurers observe they cannot comply with requirements under Solvency II, there are detailed steps that one must take.

Feargal Ryan, European counsel in Skadden’s Financial Institutions Group, and host Rob Chaplin, head of the firm’s Financial Institutions Group in Europe, break down insurers’ obligations. They explain differences between the Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) and Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR) and examine the Prudential Regulation Authority’s (PRA’s) requirements.

💡 Meet Your Host 💡

Name: Robert Chaplin

Title: Partner, Insurance at Skadden

Specialty: Rob primarily focuses on transactional and advisory work in the insurance sector. He advises on mergers and acquisitions, disposals, joint ventures and strategic reinsurances. He also counsels on regulatory issues, with an emphasis on Solvency II. 

Connect: LinkedIn  

💡 Featured Guest 💡

Name:  Feargal Ryan

What he does: Feargal advises on a wide range of insurance-related transactions, as well as regulatory issues in the insurance sector.

Organization: Skadden

Words of wisdom: “The first and most critical step is to initiate a frank and open dialogue with the PRA. Once there is any observation of actual or potential non compliance with the SCR, the insurer should detail all material matters impacting upon the insurer's financial difficulty, as well as any matters that may, in the short, medium, and or long term, impact upon the financial condition of the insurer.”

Connect: LinkedIn

Connect with Skadden

☑️ Follow us on X and LinkedIn.

☑️ Subscribe to The Standard Formula on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite podcast app.

The Standard Formula is a podcast by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, and Affiliates. This podcast is provided for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended and should not be construed as legal advice. This podcast is considered advertising under applicable state laws.