290 Folgen

Each week The Intercept’s Washington, D.C. bureau brings you one important or overlooked story from the political world. Bureau Chief Ryan Grim and a rotating cast of journalists, politicians, academics and historians tell you what the rest of the media are missing.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Deconstructed The Intercept

    • Nachrichten
    • 4,9 • 106 Bewertungen

Each week The Intercept’s Washington, D.C. bureau brings you one important or overlooked story from the political world. Bureau Chief Ryan Grim and a rotating cast of journalists, politicians, academics and historians tell you what the rest of the media are missing.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    The Venezuelan Perspective

    The Venezuelan Perspective

    At the end of July, Venezuelans head to the polls to elect a new president, with Nicolás Maduro seeking another six-year term. This week on Deconstructed, Ryan Grim speaks with Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yván Gil Pinto, who was in New York for a U.N. debate on unilateral sanctions. Fresh from visits to China and Russia, where he engaged with BRICS alliance leaders, Pinto discusses Venezuela's bid to join this coalition aimed at countering Western economic dominance. They delve into the impacts of sanctions from the Trump and Biden administrations on Venezuela's economy and migration crisis, and the battle over Citgo, a U.S.-based oil company acquired by the country in 1990. Grim also questions Venezuela's human rights record.
    Find full transcript at The Intercept.
    If you’d like to support our work, go to theintercept.com/give, where your donation, no matter what the amount, makes a real difference.
    And if you haven’t already, please subscribe to the show so you can hear it every week. And please go and leave us a rating or a review — it helps people find the show. If you want to give us additional feedback, email us at Podcasts@theintercept.com.

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    • 55 Min.
    Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito Caught on Secret Audio

    Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito Caught on Secret Audio

    In a conversation he didn’t know was being recorded, embattled Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito shared his private belief that his movement’s battle with secular forces in the country was a zero-sum contest of irreconcilable values. 
    “One side or the other is going to win,” Alito says in secretly recorded audio. Alito was speaking at a reception for the Supreme Court Historical Society last Monday evening. "I mean, there can be a way of working — a way of living together peacefully, but it's difficult, you know, because there are differences on fundamental things that really can't be compromised. It's not like you can split the difference.”
    Alito was responding to a question from Lauren Windsor, a progressive advocacy journalist and activist who regularly records conversations with Republicans and conservative movement leaders. 
    Windsor is my guest on Deconstructed this week. We’re publishing the secret audio in partnership with Rolling Stone.
    Windsor, who is making a documentary called “Gonzo for Democracy,” which will be out in the fall, reminded Alito that she had spoken with him a year earlier at the same event and wanted to ask him the same question. “What I asked you about was about the polarization in this country, about, like, how do we repair that rift?” she asked.
    “Asking questions of judges, these are the most discreet people in public life. There’s a huge amount of secrecy around the Supreme Court decisions around justices,” Windsor tells Grim. “I’m asking the questions to try to expose true intent. And given that none of the justices will go to Congress, will make their views more publicly known, I feel that it’s of intense public interest to find out whether their decisions are guided by personal religious convictions that really have no place in our public life.”
    Find full transcript at The Intercept.
    If you’d like to support our work, go to theintercept.com/give, where your donation, no matter what the amount, makes a real difference.
    And if you haven’t already, please subscribe to the show so you can hear it every week. And please go and leave us a rating or a review — it helps people find the show. If you want to give us additional feedback, email us at Podcasts@theintercept.com.

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    • 48 Min.
    The Silence Around Covid Vaccine Injuries 

    The Silence Around Covid Vaccine Injuries 

    Canada has a vaccine injury support program that has paid out more than CA$11 million to claimants; Ross Wightman was among its first recipients. This week on Deconstructed, Wightman shares his story with Ryan Grim. Days after receiving an AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine in 2021, Wightman began to experience pains unlike he had ever experienced before. He was eventually diagnosed with Guillain-Barré Syndrome, a rare autoimmune disorder that affects the body’s nerves. Grim and Wightman talk about his journey and support network, and whether new reporting from the New York Times about people who have experienced side effects from Covid vaccines signals a shift in serious media attention to concerns. 
    If you’d like to support our work, go to theintercept.com/give, where your donation, no matter what the amount, makes a real difference.
    And if you haven’t already, please subscribe to the show so you can hear it every week. And please go and leave us a rating or a review — it helps people find the show. If you want to give us additional feedback, email us at Podcasts@theintercept.com.

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    • 40 Min.
    Let’s Check In on AIPAC’s Assault on the Squad

    Let’s Check In on AIPAC’s Assault on the Squad

    In the weeks after October 7, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee took aim at members of Congress who expressed vocal opposition to Israel’s attacks on Gaza. Focusing on the so-called Squad, the Israel lobby is spending millions to push out members of Congress they view as a threat to the U.S.–Israel relationship. But Rep. Summer Lee, D-Pa., among the Squad members who called for an early ceasefire and whom AIPAC had been hoping to take out, cruised to victory in April. Now the lobby group’s sights are set on Rep. Jamaal Bowman in New York’s 16th Congressional District and Rep. Cori Bush in Missouri’s 1st Congressional District. This week on Deconstructed, Justice Democrats Usamah Andrabi and Alexandra Rojas join Ryan Grim to discuss their organizing efforts to counter campaigns taking aim at progressive members of Congress. 
    If you’d like to support our work, go to theintercept.com/give, where your donation, no matter what the amount, makes a real difference.
    And if you haven’t already, please subscribe to the show so you can hear it every week. And please go and leave us a rating or a review — it helps people find the show. If you want to give us additional feedback, email us at Podcasts@theintercept.com.

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    • 41 Min.
    “Tell the World What’s Happening Here,” Say Patients in Gaza

    “Tell the World What’s Happening Here,” Say Patients in Gaza

    “There were kids in the ICU that had bullet wounds to the chest or bullet wounds to the head,” Dr. Mohammed "Adeel" Khaleel recounts the harrowing scenes from his recent medical mission in Gaza to Ryan Grim on Deconstructed this week. An orthopedic spine surgeon hailing from Dallas, Texas, Khaleel witnessed firsthand the crushing toll on human life amid the rubble of decimated hospital infrastructure. Despite the overwhelming challenges, Khaleel highlights the unwavering dedication of medical personnel committed to providing whatever aid they can through the devastation. He returned back to the U.S. with a message from patients and doctors in Gaza: “Don't forget us.”
    If you’d like to support our work, go to theintercept.com/give, where your donation, no matter what the amount, makes a real difference.
    And if you haven’t already, please subscribe to the show so you can hear it every week. And please go and leave us a rating or a review — it helps people find the show. If you want to give us additional feedback, email us at Podcasts@theintercept.com.

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    • 33 Min.
    "Lever Time": Dissent Will Not Be Tolerated in the Democratic Party

    "Lever Time": Dissent Will Not Be Tolerated in the Democratic Party

    Today, we’re sharing the re-launch of The Lever’s flagship podcast Lever Time. In this week’s episode, David Sirota and senior podcast producer Arjun Singh discuss the 2024 presidential election, and the Democratic Party’s efforts to prevent a primary challenge to President Biden.
    Since 2008, Democratic Party leadership have worked to suppress primary challengers and support incumbent politicians. It’s not uncommon to see the party intervene in a primary on behalf of their preferred candidate in congressional and presidential races. That mentality was on full display during the 2024 Democratic primaries, where the DNC worked with its state affiliates to ensure that, in some cases, Biden’s two primary challengers didn’t even appear on the ballot.
    Given Biden’s consistently low approval ratings and now palpable anger over his handling of the war in Gaza, it raises the question: did the party intentionally prevent a proper primary from taking place because they wanted to suppress any challenges to Biden?
    Sirota and Singh unpack Biden’s popularity, and look back at what happened in the 1980 Democratic primary, when Democratic senator Ted Kennedy challenged incumbent president Jimmy Carter. 

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    • 33 Min.

Kundenrezensionen

4,9 von 5
106 Bewertungen

106 Bewertungen

Uromastyx1 ,

Really great work!

Very good for people that are interested in background-stories and good researched articles.

09876547992 ,

Good journalism, sometimes too specific for me

I like the podcast overall, the host is doing good work and is really well prepared for interviews. You can tell that he is a proper geek for the dry but vital stuff and really cares for the topic of the week.

Caring for the dry but vital stuff is a strength in many ways, but I also skip many episodes because they tend to be so in-depth on a particular, highly topical issue that they only offer archival value just a few weeks/months later and are too specific for me to care unless I'm already invested. I swing back and forth on this and I cant really tell what I find interesting at any given moment (sorry), so I dont think this is a bad thing, it just means that only some episodes are great for me. But when they are, they really are.

What I find strange is the tendency to invite rather entrenched political functionaries. Maybe others do, but I have pretty much never learned anything worthwhile from listening to someone making elaborate arguments in favor of a pretty straight-forward position I already know they hold. When I agree with the speaker it's a little boring, when I strongly disagree it comes off as dressing up a pig. Regardless of whether I agree or not, it often comes across as high-minded Washington-Ivy-League-babble of people who are very certain that they know how "the game is played". I could do with less of those episodes and more stories of people who managed to work with or around the political/monied class to help regular people, the environment, etc.

Related to the point above, I could also do with less platforming of people whose main interest is hurting others in order to gain the favor of xenophobes, preserve the US American Empire, or enrich themseves, just because they are perceived to be effective in it or to appease some strange notion of not being afraid to engage with them intellectually. I noticed that the main Intercept podcast has done this rather frequently in the past year and I am glad, that it has been pretty rare on this podcast. Its a tight line to walk between informing and platforming anyways, so I tend to give the benefit of the doubt with regards to the show-writers. I can acknowledge that this podcast doesnt exist to appease me and looking for common ground with political opposition is necessary, but listening becomes a lot more strenuous to me when it boils down to an hour of someone justifying their hate-campaigns or arguing for a supposedly necessary evil under the guise of political realism.

I think the best episodes are those where the host and his colleagues present their own original takes on political power-struggles or contextualize current events.
So, even in acknowledging that I dont like all episodes, I still think this podcast should exist the way it does and I still check out every episode to see if it is for me.

the lemonfresh ,

Very informative

Love your work! Always well researched, nuanced and most importantly, informative. This is a great podcast for anyone interested not in the hot takes but trying to understand the complexity of the problems talked about on the show.

Top‑Podcasts in Nachrichten

LANZ & PRECHT
ZDF, Markus Lanz & Richard David Precht
Apokalypse & Filterkaffee
Micky Beisenherz & Studio Bummens
15 Minuten. Der tagesschau-Podcast am Morgen
tagesschau
Lage der Nation - der Politik-Podcast aus Berlin
Philip Banse & Ulf Buermeyer
RONZHEIMER.
Paul Ronzheimer
Politik mit Anne Will
Anne Will

Das gefällt dir vielleicht auch

Intercepted
The Intercept
Jacobin Radio
Jacobin
Lever Time with David Sirota
The Lever
Bad Faith
Briahna Joy Gray
The Dig
Daniel Denvir
Ralph Nader Radio Hour
Ralph Nader

Mehr von The Intercept