67 Folgen

An unscheduled, unpredictable Supreme Court podcast. Hosted by Will Baude and Dan Epps.

Divided Argument Will Baude, Dan Epps

    • Regierung

An unscheduled, unpredictable Supreme Court podcast. Hosted by Will Baude and Dan Epps.

    Radical Agreement

    Radical Agreement

    After taking some listener questions, we analyze the lengthy shadow docket opinions in Labrador v. Poe, dealing with universal relief, emergency applications, and more. We then tackle two recent merits opinions: Devillier v. Texas (takings) and Muldrow v. St. Louis (Title VII).

    • 1 Std. 10 Min.
    Bootlegging-Adjacent

    Bootlegging-Adjacent

    After discussing a few pending issues at the Court, we look back to analyze several decisions from last month-- FBI v. Fikre, a mootness case with national security implications, and the shadow docket dispute in one of many cases named United States v. Texas (the SB4 case)-- and then turn to last Friday's more recent decision in Sheetz v. County of El Dorado about the Takings Clause and local land use policies.

    • 1 Std. 4 Min.
    Dinkus

    Dinkus

    After grappling with listener feedback ranging from the acoustic to the typographical, we catch up on last month's decisions in Great Lakes v. Raiders Retreat Realty (admiralty) and McElrath v. Georgia (double jeopardy). We then turn to last week's decisions about public officials on social media, Lindke v. Freed and O'Connor-Ratliff v. Garnier, and then finally to the statutory interpretation decision in Pulsifer v. United States. It's a lot of cases in just over an hour!

    • 1 Std. 3 Min.
    Political Hacks Pretending to be Lawyers

    Political Hacks Pretending to be Lawyers

    We (of course) break down the Court's opinions in Trump v. Anderson, the Section Three case from Colorado. We also discuss the Court's cert. grant on Trump's immunity from criminal prosecution, and several other opinions on the orders list, dealing with rent control, magnet school admissions, and campus speech.

    • 59 Min.
    Votin' for Lincoln

    Votin' for Lincoln

    After quick review of an order about admissions at West Point and two new unanimous opinions, we spend almost all of the episode breaking down last week's oral arguments in Trump v. Anderson. What excuse will the Supreme Court use to keep Colorado from disqualifying Trump from the ballot?

    • 53 Min.
    Into the Brick Wall

    Into the Brick Wall

    After catching up on a few odds and ends, we decide to give the people what they want and discuss Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment and whether the Supreme Court could possibly declare Donald Trump ineligible for the Presidency. You won't want to miss it.

    • 1 Std. 6 Min.

Top‑Podcasts in Regierung

apolut: Tagesdosis
apolut
apolut: Standpunkte
apolut
Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte (APuZ)
bpb
Auf eine weiß-blaue Tasse
Bayern.de
Werkstatt-Gespräch – KI & Bildung
bpb
Nachgefragt: Krise, Krieg und Konflikte
Redaktion Bundeswehr

Das gefällt dir vielleicht auch

Amarica's Constitution
Akhil Reed Amar
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Oyez
Advisory Opinions
The Dispatch
We the People
National Constitution Center
The National Security Law Podcast
Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck
Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Senik
The Hoover Institution