425 episodios

The Supreme Court decision syllabus, read without personal commentary. See: Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and Grigg, 33 U.S. 591 (1834) and United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337. Photo by: Davi Kelly. Founded by RJ Dieken. Now hosted by Jake Leahy. Frequent guest host Jeff Barnum. *Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.

Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast‪)‬ Jake Leahy

    • Gobierno

The Supreme Court decision syllabus, read without personal commentary. See: Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and Grigg, 33 U.S. 591 (1834) and United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337. Photo by: Davi Kelly. Founded by RJ Dieken. Now hosted by Jake Leahy. Frequent guest host Jeff Barnum. *Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.

    Connelly v. United States (Tax)

    Connelly v. United States (Tax)

    Connelly v. United StatesMichael and Thomas Connelly were the sole shareholders in Crown C Supply, a small building supply corporation. The brothers entered into an agreement to ensure that Crown would stay in the family if either brother died. Under that agreement, the surviving brother would have the option to purchase the deceased brother’s shares. If he declined, Crown itself would be required to redeem (i.e., purchase) the shares. To ensure that Crown would have enough money to redeem th...

    • 6 min
    Cantero v. Bank of America (Banking)

    Cantero v. Bank of America (Banking)

    In Cantero v. Bank of America, the Supreme Court reviewed a Second Circuit decision that struck down a New York bank regulation, finding that the State's authority was preempted by federal law. The Court held that Dodd-Frank requires a nuanced analysis -- rather than a bright line test -- on the issue of federal preemption. Justice Kavanaugh, writing for a unanimous Court, reversed and remanded with instructions on the analysis required to determine preemption.

    • 9 min
    NRA v. Vullo (First Amendment)

    NRA v. Vullo (First Amendment)

    Petitioner National Rifle Association (NRA) sued respondent Maria Vullo—former superintendent of the New York Department of Financial Services (DFS)—alleging that Vullo violated the First Amendment by coercing DFS-regulated parties to punish or suppress the NRA’s gun-promotion advocacy. The Second Circuit held that Vullo’s alleged actions constituted permissible government speech and legitimate law enforcement. The Court granted certiorari to address whether the NRA’s complaint states a...

    • 11 min
    Thornell v. Jones (Ineffective Assistance)

    Thornell v. Jones (Ineffective Assistance)

    Thornell v. Jones Respondent Danny Lee Jones was convicted of the premeditated firstdegree murders of Robert and Tisha Weaver and the attempted premeditated murder of Robert’s grandmother Katherine Gumina. Arizona law at the time required the trial court to “impose a sentence of death” if it found “one or more” statutorily enumerated “aggravating circumstances” and “no mitigating circumstances sufficiently substantial to call for leniency.” Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. §13–703(E). The trial court fo...

    • 11 min
    Coinbase v. Suski (Arbitration)

    Coinbase v. Suski (Arbitration)

    Coinbase v. Suski The dispute here involves a conflict between two contracts executed by petitioner Coinbase, Inc., operator of a cryptocurrency exchange platform, and respondents, who use Coinbase. The first contract—the Coinbase User Agreement that respondents agreed to when they created their accounts—contains an arbitration provision with a delegation clause. Per this provision, an arbitrator must decide all disputes under the contract, including whether a given disagreement is arbitrable...

    • 4 min
    Brown v. United States (Criminal)

    Brown v. United States (Criminal)

    These cases concern the application of the Armed Career Criminal Act to state drug convictions that occurred before recent technical amendments to the federal drug schedules. ACCA imposes a 15-year mandatory minimum sentence on defendants who are convicted for the illegal possession of a firearm and who have a criminal history thought to demonstrate a propensity for violence. As relevant here, a defendant with “three previous convictions” for “a serious drug offense” qualifies for ACCA’...

    • 12 min

Top podcasts de Gobierno

No es el fin del mundo
El Orden Mundial
El orden mundial en Julia en la onda
OndaCero
The Real Story
BBC World Service
Solo Documental
BANUS
Biblioteca Jurídica Digital AEBOE_MP3
AEBOE
Encuentros Fundación Telefónica
Fundación Telefónica

Quizá también te guste

We the People
National Constitution Center
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Oyez
Bloomberg Law
Bloomberg
Amarica's Constitution
Akhil Reed Amar
The Lawfare Podcast
The Lawfare Institute
Strict Scrutiny
Crooked Media