5 Popular Arguments for the Shroud of Turin Debunked | Featuring Hugh Farey

Shroud super skeptic Hugh Farey helps us debunk some popular arguments we saw made in the comments section of our previous Shroud of Turin videos: The back wound pattern, the anatomy & nail location, the blood type, pollen, and limestone from the Holy Land. Turns out they aren't as strong as you might think!

NOTE: Hugh presents a LOT of images in this one, so you may want to at least pull up the YouTube video afterwards so you can see what you were missing: https://youtu.be/_c43oVE9t2U

If you haven't seen our previous Shroud videos, check them out here:

Episode 1 (Radiometric dating & invisible patches): https://youtu.be/G4yHs6IjBFQ
Episode 2 (Image formation, Radiation, & Chemistry): https://youtu.be/5WOdy3-w6xg
Episode 3 (Art, Pollen, & Patterns): https://youtu.be/j3wffpHYleY
Debate w/ Real Seekers: https://youtu.be/xngAYdwAsKM

Hugh's links:

https://independent.academia.edu/HughFarey
https://medievalshroud.com/

Interact with us:

Twitter: https://twitter.com/PressX_toDoubt
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Reason2Doubt/
Podcast: reason2doubt.podbean.com

Timestamps
0:00 - Intro
1:15 - Hugh Farey’s Background
5:30 - Back Wounds/Roman Flagrum
11:50 - Trigger Warning - Gore Begins
13:23 - Trigger Warning - Gore Ends
18:40 - Hand Wounds
30:45 - Blood Type
44:23 - Pollen
58:45 - Limestone
1:10:00 - Questioning Shroud Research
1:18:00 - Conclusion

#skepticism #history #shroudofturin #atheism