Huberman Lab
The Huberman Lab podcast is hosted by Andrew Huberman, Ph.D., a neuroscientist and tenured professor in the department of neurobiology, and by courtesy, psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford School of Medicine. The podcast discusses neuroscience and science-based tools, including how our brain and its connections with the organs of our body control our perceptions, our behaviors, and our health, as well as existing and emerging tools for measuring and changing how our nervous system works. Huberman has made numerous significant contributions to the fields of brain development, brain function, and neural plasticity, which is the ability of our nervous system to rewire and learn new behaviors, skills, and cognitive functioning. He is a McKnight Foundation and Pew Foundation Fellow and was awarded the Cogan Award, given to the scientist making the most significant discoveries in the study of vision, in 2017. Work from the Huberman Laboratory at Stanford School of Medicine has been published in top journals, including Nature, Science, and Cell, and has been featured in TIME, BBC, Scientific American, Discover, and other top media outlets. In 2021, Dr. Huberman launched the Huberman Lab podcast. The podcast is frequently ranked in the top 10 of all podcasts globally and is often ranked #1 in the categories of Science, Education, and Health & Fitness.
Hosts & Guests
How is this free I do not know.
14/11/2022
Dr. Huberman is in my top 3 podcasts of all time. Each episode goes into so much detail that it is very difficult to leave anything unsaid but still I often feel during the episode that it lasted too short. The manner of articulating and explaining very professional studies in a very layman's way is unprecedented. His choice of topics is a hit, and the way of speaking is very pleasant. Such a good job, well done. the “just” Andrew Huberman podcasts are always a hit. Guests are awesome - yes, but when he is alone the tempo is just a tad quicker and more things get said.
Selective, often pseudoscientific and based on weak studies
1 Apr
After listening for a long time, I had growing suspicions. Some of the stuff didn't make sense or just felt incomplete. Digging further, the whole thing just unraveled. It's easy to find so many real scientists debunking misinformation in this podcast. What did it for me was the flu episode. An episode about stopping the flu not recommending and even discouraging the best and safest way to stop the flu -- the vaccine?! And not even mentioning Tamilflu? While there are useful information interspersed in the episodes, the amount of quackery and pseudoscientific guests with their own agendas (to sell books e.g.) makes it too much effort to sort through and fact check everything. Do your own due diligence and Google for yourselves! You've been warned!
Tell me more but with coffee breaks
06/07/2021
Each episode is a veritable well of information presented clearly, so that anyone can understand. Even so, it takes real commitment to really absorb it all so I wonder if shorter episodes (or episodes divided into shorter parts) would be more audience-friendly? Two hours is a lot for a layman’s ability to concentrate 🥴
Great content
27/11/2021
Best to listen when he is solo. He keeps interrupting guest in a rude way.
About
Information
- Channel
- CreatorScicomm Media
- Years Active2020 - 2024
- Episodes250
- RatingClean
- CopyrightCopyright © 2021-2024 Scicomm Media LLC
- Show Website
More From Scicomm Media
- FitnessWeekly series
You Might Also Like
- MedicineUpdated weekly
- Society & CultureUpdated weekly
- MedicineEvery two months
- MedicineUpdated weekly
- EntrepreneurshipUpdated weekly
- MedicineUpdated twice weekly
- Mental HealthUpdated twice weekly