Prosecuting Donald Trump MSNBC
-
- ニュース
-
Veteran prosecutors Andrew Weissmann and Mary McCord discuss and dissect the cases against former President Donald Trump, including the historic indictments from the Manhattan D.A., Special Counsel Jack Smith and Fulton County D.A. Fani Willis.
-
The Disinformation Campaign
Correcting the record on the falsehoods peddled around the fairness of the verdict reached in Trump’s criminal case.
-
BONUS: Witness to History
Andrew Weissmann and Rachel Maddow bring you inside the Trump courtroom.
-
“We Have a Verdict”
What comes next after a verdict is reached in the historic criminal trial of a former president.
-
In Closing
Jurors have begun deliberations in Trump’s New York trial. What to know about summations from the defense and prosecution.
-
"The E-mail Speaks for Itself"
After a stinging cross of Costello by Hoffinger, a charging conference is held to decide jury instructions. And what closing arguments need to accomplish.
-
130,000 Reasons
The fine line between a mistake and a lie is one the jury has to draw, as testimony ends in the New York trial.
カスタマーレビュー
Why The Bronx? - New York Times- May 9, 1993
First of all Love Your Show.
Please take a look at this article which explains the real reason The Bronx is called The Bronx
which was featured in The New York Times from May 9, 1993.
I am a Canadian living in Japan and it is hard to believe the direction that one man can disrupt
democracy.
Here in Japan the law is the law and there are no excuses if you break it. A prime example is if you are caught drinking and driving your license is no longer valid for 5 years. If you need it for your source of income too bad as the law makes no exceptions.
In addition I have never seen a pistol here and to obtain a license for hunting takes forever and so many checks and exams in which you have to update every few years.
Again thank you for informative show.
Regards,
David
Thoughtful and considered
I wanted to get beyond the media circus around this very important issue. This show does exactly that with some sharp and illuminating analysis of what it will mean to prosecute Donald Trump in (quite probably) the years ahead. Keep up the good work.