에피소드 58개

Attorney, host and creator Paul Townsend examines some of the most famous and infamous - and often misunderstood - court cases to make headlines across America. In doing so, he provides listeners with a true and unbiased understanding of the underlying facts as the judge or jury would have heard them at the time, explains what the role of each party was, breaks down the legal arguments presented, and gives the final word on who ultimately prevailed and why.

In Summation - The Final Word Paul Townsend

    • 사회 및 문화

Attorney, host and creator Paul Townsend examines some of the most famous and infamous - and often misunderstood - court cases to make headlines across America. In doing so, he provides listeners with a true and unbiased understanding of the underlying facts as the judge or jury would have heard them at the time, explains what the role of each party was, breaks down the legal arguments presented, and gives the final word on who ultimately prevailed and why.

    Idaho v. Brian Draper and Torey Adamcik

    Idaho v. Brian Draper and Torey Adamcik

    Welcome Back Listeners!In this episode of In Summation, Paul discusses a horror movie turned real life. Inspired by the 1996 horror classic, Scream, Brian Draper and Torey Adamcik donned ghostface masks, black robes, and hunting knives to murder their high school classmate and friend, Cassie Jo Stoddart. Not only did they stab her 30 times while she was alone, house sitting for relatives, but they filmed themselves talking about the act before, and after, the crime.We look how two...

    • 53분
    United States v. Lori Loughlin, et al. (Varsity Blues Scandal)

    United States v. Lori Loughlin, et al. (Varsity Blues Scandal)

    Remember Full House? Remember how wholesome and family-friendly it was? Remember Aunt Becky? She was married to Uncle Jesse. She was part of that wave of television which instilled good family values and strong moral character while still being funny and entertaining...life before the OC.But despite Lori Loughlin's fairly robust acting career, she found herself on the wrong side of the law. In this episode, Paul breaks down the largest college admissions scandal ...

    • 51분
    California v. Calvin Broadus (Snoop Doggy Dogg)

    California v. Calvin Broadus (Snoop Doggy Dogg)

    The 1990's were filled with high profile criminal trials for some of the most famous entertainers in the world. Michael Jackson and OJ Simpson headlined a list of extremely public trials, mostly centered in California.One case which seems to be getting lost amidst this glut of criminal prosecutions is the murder charge brought against a young up-and-coming gangster rap artist named Calvin Broadus, who adopted the stage name Snoop Doggy Dogg.A few months prior to the release of his first...

    • 52분
    Illinois v. August Spies, Albert Parsons, et al. (The Haymarket 8)

    Illinois v. August Spies, Albert Parsons, et al. (The Haymarket 8)

    Hello again friends and family,Bucking a recent trend of recent cases, today we head back roughly 140 years to Chicago in the 1880s. This is another case where a person or group's personal ideology was put on trial instead of the men and their individual actions themselves. It's a cautionary tale on what our justice system could become if we aren't vigilant in preventing it. Chicago during the industrial revolution was a tense time. The working class was always looking...

    • 1시간 4분
    Florida v. Jamell Demons (YNW Melly)

    Florida v. Jamell Demons (YNW Melly)

    Greetings friends of In Summation - The Final Word.Today's episode explores the unusual trial of Jamell Demons, aka YNW Melly, who was charged with the double murder of his close friends in what prosecutors claimed was staged to look like a drive-by shooting.This case has it all: gang members, rap stars, lyrics about murder, unusual crime scene forensics, GPS location evidence, petty thin-skinned lawyers, and a lot of question marks left over at the end.Listen and get a little perspective on ...

    • 57분
    Wisconsin v. Mark Jensen

    Wisconsin v. Mark Jensen

    Welcome back one and all. In this installment of In Summation - The Final Word, Paul breaks down one of the elements of the 6th Amendment confrontation clause. Generally speaking, a criminal defendant has the right to confront an accuser, or someone producing evidence or testimony against them. This is the basis for the rule against using hearsay at trials.In our case today, Mark Jensen was accused of murdering his wife, Julie. Julie had become increasingly suspicious ...

    • 53분

인기 사회 및 문화 팟캐스트

Korean. American. Podcast
Daniel and Jun
여둘톡
여자 둘이 토크하고 있습니다
무소속 생활자
도아,예진
B주류경제학
토스
This American Life
This American Life
그것이 알고싶다
SBS

추천 항목

The Political Orphanage
World's Smartest Podcast Network
Just Asking Questions
Reason
The Reason Roundtable
The Reason Roundtable
Something Was Wrong
Broken Cycle Media | Wondery
Honestly with Bari Weiss
The Free Press
Advisory Opinions
The Dispatch