Act of Worship

Jonathan Michael Jones
Act of Worship Podcast

Dr. Jonathan Michael Jones' discussions of worship, theology, and culture

  1. 25 AUG

    As to the Lord Part 3: The Submission of Children to Parents and Parents to God (Ephesians 6:1-4)

    Finally, in this section of text dealing with the family, the Apostle Paul gives instructions to children. Nonetheless, he does not negate the responsibility of parents in his instructions, for parents hold great responsibility in the development (especially the spiritual development) of children. A godly picture of the family includes all parties in the unit, which surely comprises children. While various ideas exist concerning the age Paul had in mind here, suffice it to say that a child may be considered one for whom a parent is responsible morally, ethically, and legally. Could that appear differently between cultures, societies, and contexts? Yes. Thus, each parent must determine those for whom they are responsible in such a manner and apply this text to those people. Paul’s words in Ephesians 6:1-4 are positioned around obedience and honor with an overarching theme of doing what is right. The rightness of such attitudes is what constitutes behavior (i.e. Christians obey and honor God because it is right irrespective of personal feelings or sentiments). Furthermore, the God-ordained family structure is dependent on parents and children doing what is right in a broad sense: namely submitting to God by submitting to one another. A key difference in parental submission and the submission of children, however, is that the role of a child includes obedience to his or her parents. Adults do not necessarily have such a charge in every context.[1] From the text, three truths may be gleaned concerning children. 1.      The motivation for obedience is the fact that it is right; 2.      honor is a primary commandment concerning children toward their parents; and 3.      authority brings up, not down. These factors should offer a supreme example to families as to how children and parents should interact with one another in a godly manner. [1] This statement is meant to imply that obedience is not sometimes necessary for adults (e.g. adults should obey their employers and legal authorities).

    39 min
  2. 25 AUG

    As to the Lord Part 3: The Servant Leadership of Husbands (Ephesians 5:25-33)

    In the second part of this series on marriage, Paul’s address to husbands will be examined. Appropriately, as the head of the family, husbands are devoted a greater portion of the text since certainly, the husband holds a greater level of accountability. Paul’s instructions here point to the husband’s role as a leader but as a leader who imitates Christ and, thus, leads through serving, for this is how Christ led his people in his earthly ministry. Paul’s instructions are explicit: the husband is to love his wife as Christ loves the church. The implicit idea is that Christ gave all for his bride and left nothing in doing so: he gave his life. The husband’s leadership is imperative to any successful marriage. As such, the husband should carefully consider what it means to 1) submit to God and 2) lead his family through serving as Christ has modeled. Paul submits that marriage is a mystery, for the union portrays Christ and the church. The husband then should seek to imitate Christ in how he handles his marriage. In Ephesians 5:25-33, three conclusions may be drawn from the text that revolve around the husband’s role as a servant leader. 1.      Christ is the ultimate model for husbands; 2.      as the church is one with Christ, the wife is one with her husband; and 3.      the mystery of marriage is led by the husband. These truths resonate in a godly marriage, which is precisely that for which husbands should strive.

    33 min
  3. 25 AUG

    As to the Lord Part 2: The Submission of Wives (Ephesians 5:21-24)

    The late Ruth Bell Graham, wife of evangelist, Billy Graham, was once approached and asked if she or her husband had ever thought about divorce. She responded with, “Divorce? No. Murder? Yes.”[1] Marriage is a relationship based on a principle as simple as submission but convoluted by unsatisfied humanity, which is why it only works when true satisfaction is found in the Lord Jesus Christ. Marriage is submission. Where submission is not present is not only a failed marriage but a marriage that does not do what it should: display a picture of Christ and his bride, the church. This series will be divided into three parts: 1) focusing on wives, 2) focusing on husbands, and 3) focusing on children and families and centering around the text in Ephesians 5:21-6:4. The common thread through the entire text is submission (first to God and then to each other). God has initiated a design for marriage that reflects his character, and it is not to be ignored, for doing so begs for failure. God-honoring marriages and families should conform to the instructions presented in Scripture. This portion of the series deals with wives. Although wives are addressed first in the text, most of Paul’s instructions are delivered to husbands. Any wives prone to offense by Paul’s address, therefore, should take comfort in the fact that his address to husbands soon follows. The charge to wives centers around submission. Submission, however, is not to be considered a negative term or inferior action, for it is necessary among all believers. For the wife, the responsibility in a marriage is to, yes, submit to the husband but first to God. Likewise, the wife’s submission to her husband presupposes the husband’s submission to God so that her best interest is considered. In the text considered today (Ephesians 5:21-24), three key essentials may be pulled from Paul’s words. 1.      Gospel-family dynamics are founded upon submission to Christ; 2.      the wife’s submission is subsequent to submission to Christ; and 3.      the wife is a representation of the church. These three elements are crucial to understanding various roles in marriage and especially the role of the wife. [1] Catherine Klasne, “Divorce? No. Murder? Yes,” UWWM, n.d., https://www.uww-adr.com/uncategorized/divorce-no-murder-yes#:~:text=The%20late%20Ruth%20Bell%20Graham,Murder%3F.

    35 min
  4. 25 AUG

    As to the Lord Part 1: Divorce and Remarriage from a Biblical Perspective

    A growing concern in Christian society is that of divorce and remarriage. Certainly, the fundamental instruction concerning the matter is Holy Scripture. While any orthodox believer would claim the Bible as the fundamental guide to their individual and collective (in the life of the church) lives, biblical interpretations concerning divorce and remarriage vary. Moreover, anecdotally, perspectives often shift throughout the course of one’s life depending on his or her own individual circumstances, which is indicative of misinterpretation or, at best, a self-centered hermeneutic. To approach all areas of life with Scripture as the primary guide is to conform to its standards no matter the situation or sentiments, which may be derived from it. In this paper, I will argue for two legitimate reasons for divorce: 1) adultery and 2) abandonment. Additionally, both cases should not be considered mandates or excuses to get out of a marriage but should be approached carefully and through the lens of the gospel. A summary of the five primary views on divorce and remarriage will be presented, ensuing an analysis of the Bible’s teaching on marriage, divorce, and remarriage, which stems from the nature and essence of marriage itself: an earthly display of Christ and his bride, the church. The conclusion will then be supported that divorce is only allowed for two reasons and should not be sought with ease. Marriage is a picture of Christ and the church and should be held with such determination. Jesus offers his bride great mercy and grace. So also should spouses with each other.

    1h 1m
  5. 13 AUG

    Recovering a Sacramental Theology in Baptist Worship Practice

    In areas of theological discourse between various Christian traditions, Baptism and the Lord’s Supper perhaps hold some of the most disparate approaches. While non-Baptist traditions frequently utilize the term, “sacrament,’ to refer to Baptism and the Lord’s Supper, contemporary Baptist traditions usually employ ordinance. Differences of view regularly regard what is believed to occur during the sacred acts: either the impartation of grace or an act of cognitive remembrance. Few would likely disagree with the truth that the acts are ordinances in that they were ordained and instituted by Jesus Christ himself (Mark 14:22-24, 1 Cor 11:23-26, Matt 26:26-30, Luke 22:14-23); yet, the notion that Baptism and the Lord’s Supper are sacraments leads to disagreement between contemporary Baptist and non-Baptist traditions. Nonetheless, a careful survey of the meaning of sacrament and its implications can bring greater compatibility between Baptists and non-Baptists.[1] Baptist teaching and worship practice often prides itself on the doctrine of grace alone. Often unrealized in Baptist teaching, however, is the fact that sacrament is also built upon grace alone. In fact, sacramental theology is founded upon the work of God rather than the work of humankind. The word, “sacrament,” is derived from the church’s union and participation with Christ. The church’s present union and participation with Christ necessitates a recovery of sacramental theology in Baptist worship practice. This paper defends the need for the recovery of sacramental theology in Baptist worship practice on a fourfold basis: 1)      an explanation of sacrament’s essence, 2)      the foundation of sacramental theology in church history, 3)      the awareness of God’s place as subject over object in worship, and 4)      the groundwork of grace alone upon which sacramental theology subsists. [1] “Christians throughout history have generally accepted Augustine of Hippo’s definition of a sacrament as ‘the visible form of invisible grace’ (‘On the Catechism of the Uninstructed,’ 26.50). However, different Christian churches and traditions vary in their understanding of how the visible sign relates to the divine grace. There are two general understandings: 1.                   The sign bestows or contains the grace. 2.                   The sign depicts, represents, or symbolizes the grace” (Eugene R. Schlesinger, “Sacraments,” ed. John D. Barry et al., The Lexham Bible Dictionary, Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2016).

    42 min

About

Dr. Jonathan Michael Jones' discussions of worship, theology, and culture

To listen to explicit episodes, sign in.

Stay up to date with this show

Sign in or sign up to follow shows, save episodes and get the latest updates.

Select a country or region

Africa, Middle East, and India

Asia Pacific

Europe

Latin America and the Caribbean

The United States and Canada