Revise and Resubmit - The Mayukh Show

Mayukh Mukhopadhyay

In Revise and Resubmit, a dynamic AI duo— Nikita and Pavlov — guides you through the fascinating world of academic research. Whether they’re debating emerging trends, revisiting theories, or exploring the latest innovations, their conversational style makes scholarly insights accessible and engaging for academics. Papers chosen by Mayukh. Powered by Google NotebookLM.

  1. Accounting and post-colonial resistance (Duenas 2025) | FT50 AOS

    14小时前

    Accounting and post-colonial resistance (Duenas 2025) | FT50 AOS

    English Podcast Start at 00:00:00 Bengali Podcast Start at 00:19:15 Hindi Podcast Start at 00:47:24 Welcome to Revise and Resubmit 🎙️✨ Today we crack open a powerhouse from a prestigious FT50 journal—Accounting, Organizations and Society—published online on 24 June 2025 by Elsevier: “Accounting and post-colonial resistance: Affective ambivalence in the international development assemblage” by Nelson Duenas. 🌍📚 Some sentences are quick. They spark. Others unspool—slow, layered, careful—like field notes written after a long day in a Southern NGO’s office, where spreadsheets hum and histories echo. Here, resistance doesn’t shout; it shivers. It leans in, then leans away. It’s attraction and repulsion, tethered together. 💥🧲 In this episode, we step into that “third space” where Homi Bhabha’s postcolonial theory meets managerial discourse. Hybridity. Ambivalence. Feeling as method. Accounting becomes a double-edged tool—discipline and doorway, control and possibility. The NGO navigates donor demands with a pulse of affects—sometimes yielding, sometimes bending, always moving. Not a barricade. A braid. Not a line. A loop. 🧵🌀 We’ll ask: When accounting mediates colonial legacies, how do emotions make policy? How does a budget become both a boundary and a bridge? And what happens when resistance is not a moment, but a motion—an ongoing flux that shifts relationships and quietly redistributes power? 🔍🧭 If this kind of rigorous, field-sharp scholarship excites you, hit follow on Spotify for Revise and Resubmit, and subscribe to our YouTube companion, Weekend Researcher. We’re also on Amazon Prime and Apple Podcast—tap in, rate, and share so these ideas travel. 🚀📈 Deep thanks to Nelson Duenas and to Elsevier for this vital contribution from the esteemed FT50 journal, Accounting, Organizations and Society. 🙏 So tell me: when a ledger speaks in two voices—one of control and one of care—where, exactly, does resistance write its line? ❓ Reference Duenas, N. (2025). Accounting and post-colonial resistance: Affective ambivalence in the international development assemblage. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 115, 101607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2025.101607 ‌Youtube Channel ⁠https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcher⁠ Connect over linkedin https://www.linkedin.com/in/mayukhpsm/

    1 小时 5 分钟
  2. Incentive alignment in ecosystems (Chatain & Plaksenkova, 2025) | FT50 SMJ

    1天前

    Incentive alignment in ecosystems (Chatain & Plaksenkova, 2025) | FT50 SMJ

    English Podcast Start at 00:00:00 Bengali Podcast Start at 00:18:54 Hindi Podcast Start at 00:44:38 Welcome to Revise and Resubmit 🎙️ Where ideas sharpen. Where evidence sings. Where strategy meets the street. 🚦 Today, we’re unpacking a fresh gem 📘 “Incentive alignment in ecosystems: The role of complementarity types and multi‐sided bargaining” by Olivier Chatain and Elena Plaksenkova, published online on 15 September 2025 in the prestigious Strategic Management Journal—an FT50 journal—published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 🏛️✨ Ecosystems rise when incentives align. They stall when they don’t. Simple. Then complex. In this study, multi-sided bargaining bends alignment in surprising ways, and the type of complementarity makes all the difference. 🔗 Multiplicative complementarities? Alignment is typically weak. Additive? Different story, different stakes. Weakest-link? It can snap tight—or snap apart—depending on who’s lagging. 🧩And those starting functionality levels? They matter more than you think. A nudge here. A gap there. Value at risk—or value unlocked. 🚀 If you’re a manager, architect, or ecosystem strategist, this is a diagnostic kit: what to look for, where alignment hides, and how much value might be slipping through the cracks. 🧠📈 Before we dive in, tap follow and subscribe to Revise and Resubmit on Spotify 🔔, and hit up our YouTube home, Weekend Researcher ▶️. We’re also available on Amazon Prime and Apple Podcast. And say hi in the chat 💬—tell us where you’re listening from! Now, here’s the spark: as complementarity types and bargaining collide, what hidden levers decide whether partners pull together—or pull apart—and how would your ecosystem look if you mapped those levers today? 🤔 Big thanks to Olivier Chatain, Elena Plaksenkova, and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. for this outstanding contribution. Reference Chatain, O., & Plaksenkova, E. (2025). Incentive alignment in ecosystems: The role of complementarity types and multi-sided bargaining. Strategic Management Journal, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.70012 ‌ ‌Youtube Channel ⁠https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcher⁠ Connect over linkedin https://www.linkedin.com/in/mayukhpsm/

    1 小时 6 分钟
  3. Creating a breakthrough invention (Roy et al. 2025) | FT50 RP

    2天前

    Creating a breakthrough invention (Roy et al. 2025) | FT50 RP

    English Podcast Start at 00:00:00 Bengali Podcast Start at 00:14:42 Hindi Podcast Start at 00:32:47 Welcome to "Revise and Resubmit" 🎙️✨ Let’s light the engines, clear the tower, and climb into a story of how big ideas actually get built. 🚀 Today’s spotlight is on a gem from the prestigious FT50-listed journal Research Policy: "Creating a breakthrough invention: NASA’s internal knowledge generation for the Space Shuttle" by Raja Roy, Curba Morris Lampert, Francisco Polidoro Jr., and Minyoung Kim. Published online on 11 September 2025 and scheduled for Volume 54, Issue 10 (December 2025) by Elsevier, this paper doesn’t just tell history—it teaches a method. 🛰️ Here’s the beat. NASA didn’t march straight to a miracle. They moved. They paused. They returned. That’s oscillation: reach the aspiration level for one performance attribute, step away, circle back with sharper eyes. Then they stacked. Brick by brick. Iteration by iteration. That’s accumulation: satisfy a few attributes now, add more in the next design, and the next, until the whole craft hums at the aspiration level. One rhythm. Then another rhythm. Together, a score. 🎼 What emerges is a dynamic, non-random search—a satisficing solution forged at the intersection of oscillation and accumulation. It’s disciplined curiosity. It’s method made music. It’s how a reusable spacecraft was not only imagined, but engineered. 🧠🔧 Before we dive, tap that follow. Subscribe to "Revise and Resubmit" on Spotify 🎧, and catch our video deep-dives on YouTube’s "Weekend Researcher" 📺. We’re also available on Amazon Prime 🛍️ and Apple Podcast 🍎🎙️—so you can learn on your commute, your coffee break, or your countdown. So, as we taxi to the runway of this Research Policy FT50 study, can we thank Raja Roy, Curba Morris Lampert, Francisco Polidoro Jr., and Minyoung Kim—and Elsevier—for this launchpad of insight, and ask: when your own breakthrough demands lift-off, will you oscillate, accumulate, or chart a new orbit between the two? ✨❓ Reference Roy, R., Lampert, C. M., Polidoro, F., & Kim, M. (2025). Creating a breakthrough invention: NASA’s internal knowledge generation for the Space Shuttle. Research Policy, 54(10), 105313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105313 ‌ ‌Youtube Channel ⁠https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcher⁠ Connect over linkedin https://www.linkedin.com/in/mayukhpsm/

    51 分钟
  4. Spouse Gets Angry, Company Suffers (Yao et al 2025) | FT50 JBR

    3天前

    Spouse Gets Angry, Company Suffers (Yao et al 2025) | FT50 JBR

    English Podcast Start at 00:00:00 Bengali Podcast Start at 00:17:54 Hindi Podcast Start at 00:38:49 🎙️ Welcome to Revise and Resubmit! 🎙️ Today, we’re diving into a paper with a title that’s impossible to ignore — “Spouse Gets Angry, Company Suffers: The Impact of Spousal Anger Expression on Employee Unethical Pro-Family Behavior.” 🥵💼❤️ Written by Zhu Yao, Na Fu, Yurong Liu, Chenqian Xu & Chao Zhang and published in the prestigious Journal of Business Ethics 🏛️ — yes, one of the coveted FT50 journals — this study takes us into a fascinating intersection where family life collides with workplace ethics. Here’s the big idea: when your spouse gets angry about family-related issues, it doesn’t just stay at home. 🏠💥 It can push employees to bend the rules at work to help the family — something researchers call Unethical Pro-Family Behavior (UPFB). And it doesn’t stop there. Using Emotions as Social Information (EASI) theory, the authors show that this chain reaction happens through two powerful pathways:💔 Guilt for family — the emotional “I need to make this right” response.🧠 Family identification — the cognitive “I’m doing this for us” thought process. The team tested this through an experiment AND a multi-wave, multi-source field study 📊📑 — and the results? Both guilt and identification play a role, but only family identification gets stronger when family motivation is high. So next time your spouse is upset, could that anger ripple all the way to your workplace ethics? 🤔 🙏 A huge thanks to Zhu Yao, Na Fu, Yurong Liu, Chenqian Xu & Chao Zhang and to Springer Nature for publishing such thought-provoking work in a top-tier journal. 📢 Don’t forget to subscribe to Revise and Resubmit on Spotify, and check out our Weekend Researcher channel on YouTube. You can also find us on Amazon Prime Music and Apple Podcast 🎧📱. Because if family emotions can change corporate behavior… what else could they change? 👀💡 Would you like me to also write a matching outro/closing monologue for the episode, so the intro and outro feel consistent and professional? Reference Yao, Z., Fu, N., Liu, Y. et al. Spouse Gets Angry, Company Suffers: The Impact of Spousal Anger Expression on Employee Unethical Pro-Family Behavior. J Bus Ethics (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-025-06119-1 ‌Youtube Channel ⁠https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcher⁠ Support us on Patreon https://patreon.com/weekendresearcher

    1 小时 1 分钟
  5. Mathematical Models of Meaning (Kockelman 2025) - Weekend Book Review

    4天前

    Mathematical Models of Meaning (Kockelman 2025) - Weekend Book Review

    English Podcast starts at 00:00:00 Bengali Podcast Starts at 00:19:56 Hindi Podcast Starts at 00:40:23 Welcome to Revise and Resubmit, and welcome to our Weekend Book Review 🎙️📚 Hey everyone, I’m so glad you’re here. Today I’m cracking open Mathematical Models of Meaning: A Dynamic Systems Approach to Possible World Semiotics by Paul Kockelman, published by MIT Press on 19 August 2025. 🔬🧠 This book asks the questions that keep me up at night: What is meaning? How do information, value, and purpose braid together when agents make choices in real time, grow over developmental time, and evolve across phylogenetic time? I love that. Short. Sharp. Then bigger. Then wide as the sky. 🌌 Kockelman builds a bridge where others build borders. He blends Bayesian inference with statistical mechanics and evolutionary game theory, then walks us across to the semiotics of Peirce, where signs meet objects, interpretants spark, and consequents ripple into action. ♟️🌀 He puts possible worlds and social relations at center stage, turning abstract equations into living drama, where distributed agents learn, coordinate, compete, and sometimes invent codes that feel like language growing roots in the soil of interaction. 🌱🤝 What I admire most is how the math never forgets the life inside it. Predator and prey teach strategy. Reinforcement learning becomes a biography of attention. Meta-semiotic processes let agents revise their own models, folding knowledge back onto itself like origami thought. And those equations? They are not just numbers. They are choices rehearsed, futures weighed, worlds compared. 🎲🔭 And the guide through all of this is Paul Kockelman, anthropologist at Yale, whose books range from The Art of Interpretation in the Age of Computation to The Anthropology of Intensity to Last Words: Large Language Models and the AI Apocalypse. He writes like a theorist who has lived with code-switchers, coders, and codes themselves. He listens to systems the way fieldworkers listen to stories. Then he rewrites the map. 🧭✨ So here’s my promise for this episode: I’ll keep the rhythm lively and the details grounded. Short lines for spark. Longer lines for texture and depth. We’ll wander possible worlds, but we’ll come back carrying tools you can use. Because meaning is not just what a sentence says. It is what an agent can do next. 🚀 🙏 Thank you, Paul Kockelman, and thank you, MIT Press.🎧 If you enjoy this, subscribe on Spotify and on our YouTube channel Weekend Researcher. We’re also available on Amazon Prime Music and Apple Podcast.🤩 Now tell me, when an agent updates its model of the world, is it discovering meaning or inventing it? Reference Kockelman, P. (2025). Mathematical Models of Meaning: A Dynamic Systems Approach to Possible World Semiotics. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/15645.001.0001 ‌Youtube channel link https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcher Connect on linkedin https://www.linkedin.com/in/mayukhpsm/

    1 小时 1 分钟
  6. Prospect Theory (Kahneman & Tversky, 2025) - Weekend Classics

    5天前

    Prospect Theory (Kahneman & Tversky, 2025) - Weekend Classics

    English Podcast Start at 00:00:00 Bengali Podcast Start at 00:22:16 Hindi Podcast Start at 00:51:43 Welcome to Revise and Resubmit — weekend classics! 🎙️✨Today we crack open “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk” by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, published March 1979 in Econometrica — a prestigious journal on the FT50 list — by The Econometric Society. 📚🏛️ Some sentences are long, unspooling like a lottery wheel 🎡; some are short. Flip. 🎯We follow choices where certainty seduces and probability whispers.We watch the certainty effect turn sure gains into caution and sure losses into daring. ⚖️We see the isolation effect snip away shared parts of a decision, then—surprise—preferences flip when the frame flips. 🔁Value is felt as gains and losses from a reference point, not as final wealth. 📈➡️📉Losses shout louder than gains. 🗣️Probabilities bend into decision weights: low odds loom large (hello gambling and insurance), while medium odds shrink in the mind. 🎲🧠 This is a weekend classic because it changed how we explain risk, not with tidy axioms, but with human hands on the scale. And yes—Econometrica isn’t just any journal; it’s a flagship, FT50, the kind people cite, teach, and build on. 🌟 Tap follow and subscribe to Revise and Resubmit on Spotify 🎧, and hit the YouTube “Weekend Researcher” channel ▶️ for deep dives. We’re also on Amazon Prime and Apple Podcast—find us where you listen. 📱✨ Drop your thoughts in the chat 💬 and tell us what frame you’re in today. So, when gains whisper and losses shout, what’s your reference point—and as you weigh your own prospects, will you join us in thanking Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky, and The Econometric Society for this enduring classic? 🤔🙏 Reference Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185 ‌Youtube Channel ⁠https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcher⁠ Support us on Patreon https://patreon.com/weekendresearcher

    1 小时 11 分钟
  7. Missed opportunities (Dyson 1972) - Weekend Classics

    5天前

    Missed opportunities (Dyson 1972) - Weekend Classics

    English Podcast Start at 00:00:00 Bengali Podcast Start at 00:17:18 Hindi Podcast Start at 00:23:46 🎙️📚 Welcome to another episode of Revise and Resubmit, and you're listening to our special segment… Weekend Classics! 🕰️✨ Here, we don’t just revisit history — we reignite it. We dust off the brilliant, the bold, the baffling papers from academic archives and ask, what did they see — and what did they miss? 🔍💭 Today, we step into the mind of a legend. A thinker who walked the line between physics and mathematics with grace, wit, and a touch of rebellion. 🧠⚡️ We’re talking about none other than Freeman J. Dyson, and his timeless 1972 lecture, 👉 “Missed Opportunities,” published in the prestigious Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, thanks to the American Mathematical Society. 📖🔬 This isn’t just a paper. It’s a mirror. Dyson explores how some of the most beautiful ideas in science were delayed—not by lack of brilliance—but by lack of conversation. 🧑‍🏫🚪🚶‍♂️ He shares how mathematicians overlooked Maxwell. How physicists brushed past group theory. How the silence between disciplines cost us decades of discovery. And then—he turns the mirror on us. On now. 👀⏳ With charm and a bit of mischief, Dyson urges mathematicians and physicists to tear down the walls of specialization and build bridges of understanding instead. 🧱💥🌉 This isn’t just academic nostalgia. It’s a wake-up call. 🚨💡 🙏 A heartfelt thank you to Freeman J. Dyson, whose words continue to echo across decades, and to the American Mathematical Society for preserving this masterwork in one of the world’s most respected journals 🏆📘 If you love ideas that outlive their time, if you crave knowledge that dares to connect dots across disciplines, then be sure to subscribe to Revise and Resubmit on Spotify 🎧, check us out on YouTube at Weekend Researcher 📺, and find us on Amazon Prime and Apple Podcast too! 🍏📲🟡 Because this is Weekend Classics… 📜 where every forgotten footnote just might be a missing chapter in the story of progress. So here’s the curious question we leave you with: 🤔 What might we be missing today—not because we don’t know… but because we’re not talking to the person in the office down the hall? 💬🚪👨‍🔬👩‍🏫 Reference Dyson, F. J. (1972). Missed opportunities. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 78(5), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9904-1972-12971-9 ‌Youtube Channel ⁠https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcher⁠ Support us on Patreon https://patreon.com/weekendresearcher

    29 分钟
  8. CrossFit in the Crosshairs (Forti et al. 2025) | FT50 ASQ

    6天前

    CrossFit in the Crosshairs (Forti et al. 2025) | FT50 ASQ

    English Podcast Start at 00:00:00 Bengali Podcast Start at 00:14:13 Hindi Podcast Start at 00:39:39 🎙️ Welcome into the podcast “Revise and Resubmit”! 📚 Today we open the covers of a brand-new Administrative Science Quarterly study—yes, that glittering FT50 powerhouse—and watch sparks fly in every direction. The title already crackles: “CrossFit in the Crosshairs: A Community-Embedded Theory of Firm Responsiveness to Social Issues.” 🏋️‍♂️ Picture thousands of local CrossFit boxes, sweating, chalk-dust swirling, when a CEO’s tweet about George Floyd ignites a national firestorm. Some gyms snap to attention, distance themselves, post statements. Others stay silent, doors half-closed, barbells still clanging. Why? Gary Provost would tell us to make the long sentence sing, the short one punch. So listen to the rhythm: Networks close. Segregation divides. Ties connect. When ties are inward-looking, outrage stays outside. When communities are stitched directly to the harmed, outrage walks right in, kicks off its shoes, and demands a response. 🔬 Enrico Forti, Alessandro Piazza, and Joost Rietveld trace this social circuitry with data from every U.S. zip code that hosts a CrossFit gym. Their theory of “community permeability” shows how the wiring of a neighborhood governs which issues surge through and which fade to a whisper—especially when businesses need local love more than ever. 💡 So lean closer, earbuds humming. Feel the cadence rise, fall, rise again. Because what happens inside those gym walls might be echoing inside your own organization, your own street, your own mind. 🤔 And here’s the curious question: if the social structure outside your door decides what you’ll stand for tomorrow, how will you rewire it today? 🙏 Thanks to the authors—Enrico Forti, Alessandro Piazza, and Joost Rietveld—and to SAGE Publications for bringing this FT50 gem to light. 🔔 Don’t forget to hit “Follow” on “Revise and Resubmit” over on Spotify, Amazon Prime, and Apple Podcast, and smash that subscribe button on our YouTube home, “Weekend Researcher.” See you in the next episode! 🎧✨ Reference Forti, E., Piazza, A., & Rietveld, J. (2025). CrossFit in the Crosshairs: A Community-Embedded Theory of Firm Responsiveness to Social Issues. Administrative Science Quarterly, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392251360671 Youtube Channel ⁠https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcher⁠ Support us on Patreon https://patreon.com/weekendresearcher

    58 分钟
查看全部 427 集

关于

In Revise and Resubmit, a dynamic AI duo— Nikita and Pavlov — guides you through the fascinating world of academic research. Whether they’re debating emerging trends, revisiting theories, or exploring the latest innovations, their conversational style makes scholarly insights accessible and engaging for academics. Papers chosen by Mayukh. Powered by Google NotebookLM.

信息

你可能还喜欢