Attorney General v Trinsalvage [2023] UKPC 26, T&T

In the Privy Council

In this episode, we look at the issue of unjust enrichment and the stultification (blocking or interference with) of public policy defence. In one corner, Lord Burrows (for the majority) argues a restitutionary remedy is sufficiently distinct to avoid stultifying legislation about public contracts. In the other, Lord Briggs of Westbourne argues that public policy should win out over restitution. Who is right?

Link to case: [2023] UKPC 26, T&T

Legal Style Blog homepage

Twitter: @legalstyleblog

E-mail: editor@legalstyle.co.uk

Legal Style Blog Guide to Uniform Privy Council Citations

To listen to explicit episodes, sign in.

Stay up to date with this show

Sign in or sign up to follow shows, save episodes, and get the latest updates.

Select a country or region

Africa, Middle East, and India

Asia Pacific

Europe

Latin America and the Caribbean

The United States and Canada