Diabolical Lies

Katie Gatti Tassin & Caro Claire Burke
Diabolical Lies
PACK OF LIARS

Get full, ad-free access to every episode.

5.99 $/tháng hoặc 59.99 $/năm

We regret to inform you that it really is That Deep. diabolicallies.substack.com

Tập

  1. Abortion: Say It With Your Chest

    3 THG 11

    Abortion: Say It With Your Chest

    In this conversation… Caro & Katie talk about abortion in America, starting with leaders in the evangelical church recognizing it as a political tool in the 1970s with which to gain power in the face of unwanted desegregation, to the profound discomfort that modern politicians across the spectrum express about the subject—that is, until maybe, right now. It turns out that American women have never actually been guaranteed the freedom to get an abortion, and to begin changing that, we need a new moral framework. References, Bonus Reading & Timestamps, Oh My References “An Irish Problem,” a knock-your-socks-off essay by Sally Rooney about something that is also, incidentally, An American Problem “Hillary Clinton’s Moral Conflicts on Abortion,” a 2016 profile in The Atlantic that feels, in retrospect, like such an ambulance siren warning for the years to come that it might just inspire you to quit your job, spend a decade or two building a time machine, and go back in time just to try that much harder to get Bernie across the finish line at the DNC “Obama Says Abortion Rights Are Not a Priority,” a 2009 Reuters article that will make you realize the time machine needs to take you back earlier “Jimmy Carter Says Jesus Would Not Support Abortion, Revealing ‘Only Conflict’ Between His Politics and Christian Faith,” an article that will make you say fuck it, the time machine effort is pointless, and inspire you to smash the time machine in a field, Office Space-style, because when it comes to Democrats dropping the ball on abortion, the limit does not apparently exist “Doctors Agreed Her Baby Would Die 3 Months Before She Was Forced to Give Birth,” a Rolling Stone story of a Florida woman who was psychologically, physically, and financially tortured by Ron DeSantis’s abortion laws The Turnaway Study (2008), a 10-year longitudinal study of nearly 1,000 women who sought abortions—some of whom accessed care and others who were denied it—that found not only do women who get abortions not regret it (95% reported it was the right choice in the years that followed), but those who don’t receive care accurately predict the hardships they will encounter after being denied care “The Obstacle Course Facing Those Seeking Abortions,” a 2021 interview with reproductive rights expert Carole Joffe that offers insight into just how shitty our “golden age” of reproductive rights under Roe really was “The Religious Right and the Abortion Myth,” a 2022 piece in Politico in which old quotes from Christianity Today prove how little church leaders cared about abortion, and how in 1971, the delegates to the Southern Baptist Convention passed a resolution calling for the legalization of abortion, a position they reaffirmed in 1974 and again in 1976 (one year and three years after Roe v. Wade, respectively) Bonus Reading/Listening “The New York Times’ War on Trans Kids,” a truly stellar episode of If Books Could Kill that highlights the Republican strategy of taking a microscopic statistic/nonexistent “problem” and using it to delegitimize an entire civil rights issue “Abortion Is Ancient History and That Matters Today,” a lovely CNN debunking of the “abortion = modernity” fallacy we see everywhere “The Brilliance of Safe, Legal, and Rare,” an Atlantic article highlighting the most annoying “pro-choice” rhetorical argument of all time Timestamps 0:00 - this episode brought to you by… 1:15 - Diabolical Lies makes its first-ever presidential endorsement!!! 2:30 - lil explainer on how today’s conversation will unfold, featuring a deranged metaphor/Dane Cook deep cut about three monkeys f*****g a coconut 4:42 - meet the first monkey that f****d the coconut: the Republican christo-fascist base 12:44 - discussing the OG political pick-me, Phyllis Schlafly 17:01 - meet the second monkey that fucked the coconut: the Supreme Court 35:00 - addressing the post-Dobbs, T.S. Elliott-Wastel

    1 giờ 38 phút
  2. 6 THG 10

    The *Real* Reason Republicans Are Desperate to Impregnate You

    In this conversation… Two pre-menopausal females break down the replacement theory panic disguised as Reasonable! Political! Concern! and why it’s completely unnecessary and counterproductive to entertain the pronatalist conversation on their terms: that is, litigating the validity of having (or not having) children. It is not, and has never been, about the kids. Bonus Reading The Dawn of Everything by David Graeber and David Wengrow, which really puts the whole “the traditional, natural order is the nuclear family with the man at the helm” into historical context Sisters in Hate by Seyward Darby, an absolute banger about the girlbosses of white nationalism “White Noise,” a documentary about Richard Spencer, Lauren Southern, and Mike Cernovich’s rise to viral fame ha ha ha everything’s fine! “The Housewives of White Supremacy” by Annie Kelly, a piece that traces the current anti-feminist resurgence to economic precarity and a mythic past in which everyone had sugar daddies and three-bedroom starter homes “The Cultural Politics Behind JD Vance’s Obsession with ‘Cat Ladies’” by Jacob Rosenberg for Mother Jones, an interview with Dr. Melinda Cooper about how “the legalization of same-sex marriage has shifted the line of deviance from sexuality to reproductivity” “Pro-Natalism” on In Bed with the Right, featuring some of the commentary we discussed from feminist writer Moira Donegan “Warren Hern, America’s Abortion Doctor,” a New Yorker interview conducted by Jia Tolentino with the only octogenarian doctor on the planet that we will personally beg not to retire “Roe Was Never Enough Anyway,” a critique of the landmark abortion case in Boston Review by Rachel Rebouché, in which she casually points out that Roe NEVER ACTUALLY GUARANTEED ABORTION ACCESS TO BEGIN WITH HAHA K COOL “What the ‘Mississippi Appendectomy’ Says About the Regard of the State Towards the Agency of Black Women’s Bodies,” a historical analysis that, fair warning, will radically change your relationship to our nation’s history, and to the practice of colonialism writ large, if you aren’t familiar with this topic “Israel Gave Birth Control to Ethiopian Jews Without Their Consent,” ha ha ha ha ha here we go again same story different colonial project cool cool cool no biggie …and a funny little tiktok to reward you for reading so much depressing shit Time Stamps 1:00 Katie sets the scene for the conversation, and makes a startling admission in the meantime 5:00 enter, stage left: the interview where JD Vance acknowledged his wife’s skin color in the most American Psycho way possible 8:00 Caro takes a moment to shit all over Megyn Kelly 10:00 let’s talk about how *~meaningful*~ it is to have kids, no wait we mean economically important, no wait we mean personally meaningful, NO WAIT — 16:00 if you’re wondering whether republicans give a single shit about babies/families/women, take a gander at how they engage with labor unions 21:00 the sneaky little fact that no one discusses in the birth rate conversation 25:00 let’s talk about how tenuous the connections are between marriage, child welfare, and child stability 32:00 who decides what is “natural” and “human” and what is not? 35:30 the first cracks in the pronatalism argument become evident 37:00 let’s discuss the Quiverfull movement!!! 48:00 exploring the cultural roots and propaganda campaigns that motivate women to lean into the pronatalist movement 59:30 how the republican party harnesses the f**k out of nostalgia to make us perceive their DEEPLY IMPRACTICAL goals as highly practical and maybe even inevitable 1:05:00 the part where we realize this episode is literally the sequel to agriculture wars 1:08:00 let’s address the elephant in the room, the elephant in question being *checks notes* the virtual elimination of teen pregnancies being somehow bad 1:10:00 insert obligatory conservative trans/gender panic h

    1 giờ 32 phút
  3. 22 THG 9

    Taylor Swift, Injectables, and Other Genres of Magical Thinking

    In this conversation… The picture heard ‘round the Reddit Popular page has reignited the internet’s favorite form of is-that-misogyny? debate: Ladies, are we allowed to talk about what may or may not be happening on Taylor Swift’s face? Plastic surgery speculation is an online sport in its own right, but the real story is what it tells us about our culture’s attitude toward cosmetic procedures (and the “feminist” way to participate) that the mere suggestion ignites such a fervent defense of Swift’s honor. The grand, widely celebrated deception of dermal filler is the foundation on which this melodrama is built. Bonus Reading “How long do dermal fillers really last? MRI scans provide evidence,” from Victorian Cosmetic Institute, a 5-year-old YouTube video clearly outlining the little-discussed long-term effects, plus this sort of clickbait-y follow-up about the risk of dissolver “destroying [your] face” by the same doctor, that explains how the dissolver—a substance called hyaluronidase—works “Hyaluronic Acid Filler Longevity in the Mid-face: A Review of 33 Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies” in the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery-Global Open journal, July 2024 “On cosmetic procedures and the limits of ‘destigmatization,’” by Haley Nahman, November 2022 “In the Name of Beauty,” Tressie McMillan Cottom, 2019 (highly recommend this entire essay collection, Thick) “Allie Rowbottom is no botox moralist,” by Brock Colyar for New York Magazine (also recommend Rowbottom’s novel, Aesthetica) “We’re Having Fun, Right?” (Katie’s essay mentioned in the episode, about the unique psychological torment of entering a Sephora) Down, Girl: The Logic of Misogyny by Kate Manne, which offers a definition of misogyny that focuses not on feelings of hatred toward women, but the social systems that enforce a patriarchal set of standards in women’s behavior to see what terrifying ground we’ll traverse next, subscribe for more 🤠 Time Stamps 0:15:00 - let’s talk about that viral picture of TS looking “crispy” 3:30 - Caro self-therapizes about why she has so many blind spots as a Swiftie haha lol 8:37 - Katie gives a crash course in filler (how it works, how we understand and misunderstand it) 18:00 - some thoughts on the effort to dEsTiGmaTiz3 Be@uTy, LadiEZ! 23:00 - the more injectables are democratized, the more that famous people will distance themselves from the endeavor 25:05 - caro claims botox as her latest roman empire, katie immediately chops her off at the knees 31:20 - do we no longer believe that beauty standards are dangerous? 32:23 — theory #1 regarding why people are so effing defensive about TS getting work done (keywords: feminism, honesty, amnesty, Alix Earle) 36:50 - theory #2 regarding why people are so effing defensive about TS getting work done (keywords: code switching, the aryan movement, branding) 38:40 - how race theory plays a foundational role in the plastic surgery/injectables conversation 44:20 - Katie’s Grand Unifying Theory of Filler™ 51:35 - is it maybe a good thing that we’re culturally freaked out by injectables? 53:50 - theory #3 regarding why people are so effing defensive about TS getting work done (keywords) 55:50 - theory #4 regarding why people are so effing defensive about TS getting work done 57:00 - theory #5! how! high! will! they! go! (keywords: thinkers, objects, commodifiers) 1:01:50 - why the “my body my choice” argument is b******t in the context of cosmetic surgery/injectables 1:05:00 - on the importance of being ruthless with systems and kind to people 1:09:50 - why beauty is the only form of capital that women are encouraged to pursue 🫠 1:12:45 - the irony of happiness myth surrounding the beauty standard (“I do this because it makes me happy/feel good!”) 1:19:50 - ever notice how women are allowed to age if they’re in artistic fields where their faces are hidden/obscured by their art, whereas s

    1 giờ 27 phút
  4. 8 THG 9

    Blake Lively is Content

    What began as a debrief about the ongoing, deeply ridiculous moral panic surrounding a number of celebrities this summer morphed into an expansive discussion about the truth of “celebrity,” what it means to be famous, how we distinguish content from art, and why the context-collapse of algorithms is wreaking so much havoc on our brains. Bonus Reading “Why Is Everyone Mad at Blake Lively?” by Alex Abad-Santos for Vox “Blake Lively on Fame, Family, Good Fortune—And Becoming a Glamorous Jewel Thief for Baz Luhrmann” by Andrew Sean Greer for Vogue “Chappell Roan Confronts the Sickness of Modern Fandom,” by Kelsey McKinney for Defector (the comments on this one are just as interesting as the piece itself!) “Chappell Roan Doesn’t Owe You Shit,” by Lauren Hough on Badreads “Why A.I. Isn’t Going to Make Art,” by Ted Chiang for The New Yorker Time Stamps 2:00 — Deep dive of the source material: Colleen Hoover’s It Ends With Us 10:00 — Blake Lively enters the CoHo Cinematic Universe 21:20 — What is this online drama with the It Ends With Us film actually about? And what do celebrities owe us, if anything? 29:45 — The difference between celebrities and artists 32:10 — Let’s talk about that extremely terrible interview clip circulating all over the internet right now 37:00 — The medium is the message: how algorithms function as the internet’s dopamine receptor 44:00 — Is Blake Lively filling the Taylor Swift conversation vacuum? 48:20 — Chappell Roan doesn’t owe you shit 53:20 — Why the process of becoming famous necessitates the need to “sell out” 1:07:00 — What is the functional difference between content and art? 1:15:00 — Liberals have moral panics too 1:21:00 — How the moral high ground operates in the internet landscape This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit diabolicallies.substack.com/subscribe

    1 giờ 29 phút
4,8
/5
144 Xếp hạng

Giới Thiệu

We regret to inform you that it really is That Deep. diabolicallies.substack.com

Có Thể Bạn Cũng Thích

Bạn cần đăng nhập để nghe các tập có chứa nội dung thô tục.

Luôn cập nhật thông tin về chương trình này

Đăng nhập hoặc đăng ký để theo dõi các chương trình, lưu các tập và nhận những thông tin cập nhật mới nhất.

Chọn quốc gia hoặc vùng

Châu Phi, Trung Đông và Ấn Độ

Châu Á Thái Bình Dương

Châu Âu

Châu Mỹ Latinh và Caribê

Hoa Kỳ và Canada