Post Reports
Post Reports is the daily podcast from The Washington Post. Unparalleled reporting. Expert insight. Clear analysis. Everything you’ve come to expect from the newsroom of The Post, for your ears. Martine Powers and Elahe Izadi are your hosts, asking the questions you didn’t know you wanted answered. Published weekdays around 5 p.m. Eastern time.
包含訂閱福利的節目
Trans episode
12月4日
Love post reports but for some reason on this topic they decided to ignore the data from the rest of the world banning these meds for minors because they cause more harm than good in all longitudinal studies that have been published. I know this is a majority left leaning pod but at least keep the relevant facts in there.
Valley girl discussion, ugh
5 天前
The segment I tried to listen to was about the recent food recalls in the US. I had to stop the pod due to the awful “valley girl” delivery of the commentary. The guest (Rachel?) was especially annoying. It was like an SNL skit with accentuated valley girl-like accents & drawn out endings of words & sentences
I dropped Amazon Prime…
11月8日
…and kept my Washington Post subscription. And I’m glad I did. Your journalism is close to being nonpareil. But how can you do an entire debrief on the outcome of the 2024 general election without once mentioning voter suppression? The principal project of conservative megadonors over the last 50 years has been severely restricting access to voting. A project conceived in the ‘70s and enacted beginning in the ‘80s is bearing strange fruit today. Conservative megadonors getting Trump into office a second time — largely by attacking voting, restricting voting, preventing voting, and tossing out an unprecedented number of ballots even after they were cast — is openly a win for the old Confederacy. Are you so genteel that, to uphold the old myth of U.S. exceptionalism, “the beacon of democracy and free elections,” you will ignore the truth in the data staring us all right in the face?? The right to vote itself has been under attack across the U.S. since the 1980s. Getting the truth out to the public will require an act of selfless journalism … and I hope you will commit it!
show on solar needs additional research
11月30日
The discussion on the solar rooftop show provided an understated discussion regarding implications of these large solar panel fields being planned and constructed over large swaths of land. The possibility solar fields ‘could’ interact with endangered species was mentioned. That’s incomplete because it’s not a possibility, it’s an actuality. Equally as important, there are acres upon acres of fragile desert soils being disturbed with the installation of fields of solar panels. Not only will this affect the ability of the desert surfaces to maintain vegetation moving forward through time, but this disturbance is likely to cause huge amount of mobilized dust, which has a whole host of other implications as well, health affects included. How about the inequity of generating health hazards for rural communities? Not to mention the value of empty land for variety of reasons: scientific, preservation, recreation, enjoyment by the public, etc. Furthermore, the discussion of funding solar on rooftops may be correct for wherever you did your researching, but is incorrect for other locations. At least in some parts of the country solar panels are being installed on roofs with zero down, the monthly payment is less than the electricity bill, and that is not only for high income households. And the policy is such that owners don’t receive credits or payment for generating more than they use. Also, I am guessing there are a lot of solutions to address the issue of equity other than simply not putting solar on the rooftops. Why is the emphasis not on the need to harness the energy that could be generated from rooftops, storing, and distributing it efficiently. Imagine the power there, on land already disturbed!
簡介
資訊
- 頻道
- 創作者The Washington Post
- 活躍年代2018年 - 2024年
- 集數1598
- 年齡分級兒少適宜
- 版權© The Washington Post
- 提供者The Washington Post