U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Oyez

4.7 (613)
政府
一周一更

Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.

10月16日

Bufkin v. McDonough

A case in which the Court will decide whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims must ensure that the benefit-of-the-doubt rule in 38 U.S.C. § 5107(b) was properly applied during the claims process in order to satisfy 38 U.S.C. § 7261(b)(1).

1 小时 13 分钟
10月16日

City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency

A case in which the Court will decide whether the Clean Water Act allows the Environmental Protection Agency (or an authorized state) to impose generic prohibitions in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits that subject permit-holders to enforcement for violating water quality standards without identifying specific limits to which their discharges must conform.

1 小时 38 分钟
10月15日

Bouarfa v. Mayorkas

A case in which the Court will decide whether a visa petitioner may obtain judicial review when an approved petition is revoked on the basis of nondiscretionary criteria.

49 分钟
10月15日

Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn

A case in which the Court will decide whether economic harms resulting from personal injuries are injuries to “business or property by reason of” the defendant’s acts for purposes of a civil treble-damages action under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act.

1 小时 8 分钟
10月9日

Glossip v. Oklahoma

A capital case in which the Court will decide whether to allow Oklahoma to execute Petitioner Richard Glossip after numerous instances of prosecutorial misconduct and other errors, where even the state no longer defends the capital sentence.

1 小时 43 分钟
10月8日

Garland v. VanDerStok

A case in which the Court will decide whether the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives has the authority to regulate so-called “ghost guns”—that is, firearms without serial numbers that can be assembled from parts.

1 小时 16 分钟
10月8日

Lackey v. Stinnie

A case in which the Court will decide whether a party who obtains a preliminary injunction is a “prevailing party” for purposes of being entitled to attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988.

1 小时 18 分钟
10月7日

Royal Canin U.S.A. v. Wullschleger

A case in which the Court will decide whether a plaintiff whose state-court lawsuit has been removed by the defendants to federal court can seek to have the case sent back to state court by amending the complaint to omit all references to federal law.

1 小时 5 分钟

查看全部 72 集

4.7

共 5 分

613 个评分

A Delightful window into the Supreme Court

7月2日

GCChaser

This easy to use podcast should be required listening for all Americans. Listening to the oral arguments not only provides an education into how the process works but also provides a view into how the justices approach very complex cases.
Simple podcast but exactly what i need

2月29日

XheanortXIII

Thank you for what you do
I enjoy listening to the arguments

2023/03/05

perdiemmedic

And then listening to companion type podcast who discuss and give context
Super delayed

2月9日

ballinb5

Hard to keep up with the news. Sometimes arguments take days to weeks to show up in podcasts

Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.

创作者

Oyez
活跃年份

2015年 - 2024年
单集

72
节目网站

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Bufkin v. McDonough

City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency

Bouarfa v. Mayorkas

Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn

Glossip v. Oklahoma

Garland v. VanDerStok

Lackey v. Stinnie

Royal Canin U.S.A. v. Wullschleger

A Delightful window into the Supreme Court

Simple podcast but exactly what i need

I enjoy listening to the arguments

Super delayed

关于

信息

更多来自“Oyez”的内容

你可能还喜欢

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

单集

Bufkin v. McDonough

City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency

Bouarfa v. Mayorkas

Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn

Glossip v. Oklahoma

Garland v. VanDerStok

Lackey v. Stinnie

Royal Canin U.S.A. v. Wullschleger

评分及评论

A Delightful window into the Supreme Court

Simple podcast but exactly what i need

I enjoy listening to the arguments

Super delayed

关于

信息

更多来自“Oyez”的内容

你可能还喜欢