Revise and Resubmit - The Mayukh Show

Mayukh Mukhopadhyay
Revise and Resubmit - The Mayukh Show

In Revise and Resubmit, a dynamic AI duo— Nikita and Pavlov — guides you through the fascinating world of academic research. Whether they’re debating emerging trends, revisiting theories, or exploring the latest innovations, their conversational style makes scholarly insights accessible and engaging for academics. Papers chosen by Mayukh. Powered by Google NotebookLM.

  1. Explicit two-source extractors and resilient functions (Chattopadhyay & Zuckerman 2019)

    2H AGO

    Explicit two-source extractors and resilient functions (Chattopadhyay & Zuckerman 2019)

    English Podcast Start at 00:00:00 Bengali Podcast Start at 00:22:35 Hindi Podcast Start at 00:29:08 🎙️✨ Welcome to another mind-bending episode of Revise and Resubmit! ✨🎙️ Today, we're dialing up the excitement in the mathematical multiverse and diving into a landmark paper that doesn't just crack a long-standing problem—it shatters it with the precision of pure theory and the elegance of mathematical art. 🧠⚡ 📘 Title? "Explicit Two-Source Extractors and Resilient Functions"🧑‍🔬 Authors? The brilliant duo — Eshan Chattopadhyay and David Zuckerman.🏛️ Journal? The mighty Annals of Mathematics, no less.🏆 First dropped as a Best Paper at the 48th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing in 2016, and fully blossomed into its final form in 2019, thanks to Princeton University and the Institute of Advanced Study. Yes, that Princeton. So what’s the big deal? 🤔Well, picture this: You're trying to extract a single clean bit of randomness from two messy, weak sources. Previous math legends like Bourgain could do it only if each source had nearly half the entropy of the entire input. But Chattopadhyay and Zuckerman? They sliced that need down to just polylogarithmic entropy. 📉💥 Their tool? An exquisitely crafted Boolean function—monotone, almost-balanced, and unbelievably resilient. Even if an adversary controls a ton of the input bits, the output holds strong. 🤖🛡️And here's the twist—this extractor doesn't just stay in the realm of theory. It pushes the limits on Ramsey graph constructions, nudging closer to long-dreamed bounds. Barak et al. laid the groundwork, and these two took the leap. 🧩🧗 But how does one even design such a function that laughs in the face of adversarial interference?What does it take to extract order from chaos—explicitly, reliably, and with mathematical elegance? 💬 Stick around as we peel back the layers of randomness, resilience, and radical breakthroughs!And a massive thank you to the authors—Eshan Chattopadhyay and David Zuckerman—for this phenomenal contribution. 🙏📄 📢 Don’t forget to subscribe to this podcast, Revise and Resubmit, on Spotify, 📻smash that bell on our YouTube channel Weekend Researcher 🔔📺,and catch us on Amazon Prime and Apple Podcast 🍎🎧 Now here's your question to chew on:🌪️ If randomness can be extracted from weak, chaotic sources… could the same principles apply to the way we make decisions in complex systems? Could we find order, even meaning, in the noise of real life? 🌌 Let’s find out—together. 🎧 Reference Chattopadhyay, E., & Zuckerman, D. (2019). Explicit two-source extractors and resilient functions. Annals of Mathematics, 189(3). https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2019.189.3.1 Eshan Chattopadhyay and David Zuckerman. 2016. Explicit two-source extractors and resilient functions. In Proceedings of the forty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 670–683. https://doi.org/10.1145/2897518.2897528 ‌Youtube channel link https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcher Support us on Patreon https://patreon.com/weekendresearcher

    35 min
  2. Your Brain on ChatGPT (Kosmyna et al. 2025) | MIT Media Labs

    22H AGO

    Your Brain on ChatGPT (Kosmyna et al. 2025) | MIT Media Labs

    English Podcast Start at 00:00:00 Bengali Podcast Start at 00:50:09 Hindi Podcast Start at 00:55:51 🎙️✨ Welcome to another mind-bending episode of Revise and Resubmit! ✨🎙️ Today’s episode is not just about writing essays… oh no. It’s about what your brain is really doing when ChatGPT becomes your study buddy 🤖🧠. Are you sharpening your intellect—or unknowingly writing an IOU to your own cognitive future? 📄 In this electrifying preprint from MIT Media Lab, titled “Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task,” a powerhouse team of researchers—Nataliya Kosmyna, Eugene Hauptmann, Ye Tong Yuan, Jessica Situ, Xian-Hao Liao, Ashly Vivian Beresnitzky, Iris Braunstein, and the ever-iconic Pattie Maes—took 54 participants, wired their brains with EEG sensors ⚡, and unleashed them into four rounds of essay writing... but with a twist 🧠✍️. Some relied on just their brains. Others got help from search engines. And the rest? They had ChatGPT by their side. But when the tools were taken away… what happened? 🧠 Brain-only writers lit up like neural fireworks. 💻 Search Engine users hovered in the middle. And LLM users? Well… let’s just say the lights were dimmer than expected. 😶‍🌫️ From memory loss to essay disownership, from reduced alpha/beta connectivity to underwhelming essay scores judged by both humans and AI, this paper uncovers the real toll of leaning too hard on AI for intellectual labor. But here’s the kicker—🤔 if LLMs make us faster, yet weaker thinkers... is convenience quietly bankrupting our brains? 💥 Big thanks to the brilliant authors of this study. You’ve sparked a conversation we need to have. 🔥 🎧 Don’t forget to subscribe to Revise and Resubmit on Spotify and our YouTube channel Weekend Researcher 📺. You’ll also find us on Amazon Prime and Apple Podcast. Because the future of learning is just one click away… and so are its consequences. 🧩 🌀 So tell me, listeners… When the machine writes the essay, who’s really doing the learning? 🧠💭 Reference Kosmyna, N., Hauptmann, E., Yuan, Y. T., Situ, J., Liao, X.-H., Beresnitzky, A. V., Braunstein, I., & Maes, P. (2025). Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task. ArXiv.org. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08872 Nataliya Kos'myna. (2025). Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task – MIT Media Lab. MIT Media Lab. https://www.media.mit.edu/publications/your-brain-on-chatgpt/ ‌Youtube channel link https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcher Support us on Patreon https://patreon.com/weekendresearcher

    1h 3m
  3. Made Better by Others? (Goradia & Byron, 2024) | FT50 POM

    1D AGO

    Made Better by Others? (Goradia & Byron, 2024) | FT50 POM

    English Podcast starts at 00:00:00 Bengali Podcast starts at 00:22:52 Hindi Podcast starts at 00:32:06 🎙️✨ Welcome to another episode of Revise and Resubmit! ✨🎙️ Today’s episode is called “Made Better by Others?”—and trust us, you’ll want to lean in for this one. Imagine walking into a hospital, not knowing the people behind the scenes. Now imagine learning that the diversity of your doctor’s colleagues could actually affect your health outcomes—your hospital bill, your length of stay, even your chances of going home sooner. 📉🏥💸 Today, we dive into a groundbreaking study authored by Deepa Goradia and Kris Byron, published in the prestigious Production and Operations Management journal—yes, one of the FT50 heavyweights. 🏆📚 This isn’t just another paper about workplace inclusion. This is a data-rich exploration—over 10 million patients, 25,000 physicians, 4 years, and 240 hospitals—all coming together to ask: Does the diversity of your team truly make you better at your job? Through the lens of gender diversity and specialization diversity, we uncover surprising patterns: 👩‍⚕️👨‍⚕️ Gender-diverse teams shine brighter in focused departments. 🧠🔬 Specialization-diverse teams thrive in departments where focus is spread wide. This isn’t just about management theory—it’s about the pulse of real patient care. 💡💉 🙏 A huge thank you to the authors Deepa Goradia and Kris Byron, and to SAGE Publications for supporting this essential research. And remember, this paper isn't just published—it’s published in an FT50 journal. That’s the academic equivalent of a Grammy win. 🏅📖 💬 But here’s the question that’s still echoing in our minds: If being surrounded by difference makes us better, then what happens when we surround ourselves with only those who are just like us? 🤔🌐 🎧 If that sparked your curiosity, don’t forget to subscribe to “Revise and Resubmit” on Spotify, hit that bell on our YouTube channel “Weekend Researcher”, and catch us on Amazon Prime and Apple Podcasts too. 📱🍎📺 🚀 Because the future of research deserves a bigger stage—and you’re on it. Reference Goradia, D., & Byron, K. (2024). Made Better by Others? When Having More Diverse Colleagues Improves Individual Outcomes. Production and Operations Management, 34(3), 356-381. https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478241238973 Link to Enroll at AMR Bridge Reviewer Program - https://aom.org/research/journals/review/amr-bridge-reviewer-program ‌Youtube Channel ⁠https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcher⁠ Support us on Patreon https://patreon.com/weekendresearcher

    40 min
  4. The Six Dimensions of Strong Theory (Carton 2025) | FT50 ORSC

    2D AGO

    The Six Dimensions of Strong Theory (Carton 2025) | FT50 ORSC

    English Podcast starts at 00:00:00 Bengali Podcast starts at 00:19:17 Hindi Podcast starts at 00:26:28 🎙️✨ Welcome back to Revise and Resubmit, the podcast where great research meets fresh curiosity! ✨🎙️ Today’s episode is one for the academic adventurers, the theory tinkerers, and the idea architects — because we’re diving deep into the soul of scholarship. Welcome to this week's episode titled: “The Six Dimensions of Strong Theory.” 📚 Our guide on this intellectual expedition? None other than Andrew M. Carton, whose brand-new article—just published ahead of print on June 13, 2025—takes center stage in the prestigious FT50 journal, Organization Science. 🏆📖 Published by the brilliant folks at INFORMS, this piece isn’t just a paper… it's a blueprint for how to think about thinking. Carton doesn't just critique or praise theory. No — he dissects it. He lays out a six-point typology that captures the essence of theoretical strength: 🔑 Importance 🤯 Interestingness 🛠️ Actionability 🌍 Generality ⚙️ Simplicity 📏 Accuracy But here’s the twist: trying to optimize all six? That’s like chasing a unicorn through a maze of mirrors. 🦄💫 Instead of endless compromise, Carton urges us to prioritize. To choose our battles. To craft theories that don’t try to do it all — but do some things brilliantly. So here’s the curious question we leave you with today: 🧐 If you had to build a theory that was only strong in two dimensions... which would you choose — and what would you be willing to sacrifice? 🎧 A huge thank-you to Andrew M. Carton and the publisher INFORMS for bringing this profound work into the world — and making it part of such a distinguished journal as Organization Science, a proud member of the FT50 list. 🙌📘 💥 Don’t forget to subscribe to Revise and Resubmit on Spotify, YouTube (via our channel 👉 Weekend Researcher), Amazon Prime, and Apple Podcast! 💥 Because your next favorite theory might just be one episode away. 🚀 Reference Carton, A. M. (2025). The Six Dimensions of Strong Theory. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2024.19018 Link to Enroll at AMR Bridge Reviewer Program - https://aom.org/research/journals/review/amr-bridge-reviewer-program ‌Youtube Channel ⁠https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcher⁠ Support us on Patreon https://patreon.com/weekendresearcher

    35 min
  5. The Academic Paper That Started Google (Brin & Page 1998) - Weekend Classics

    3D AGO

    The Academic Paper That Started Google (Brin & Page 1998) - Weekend Classics

    English Podcast Start at 00:00:00 Bengali Podcast Start at 00:22:31 Hindi Podcast Start at 00:30:00 🎙️✨ Welcome to another thrilling episode of Revise and Resubmit – this one’s our special segment, Weekend Classics! 📚💫 Today, we're rewinding the digital clock ⏳—all the way back to 1998, when the internet was a frontier and search engines were still clunky, chaotic, and crawling toward meaning. And then... two Stanford PhD students, Sergey Brin and Lawrence Page, decided to shake things up. 🧠💥 Their paper, "The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine," wasn’t just research—it was the blueprint of Google. Yes, that Google. 🌐🔍 Before it became a verb, before it ruled our browsers, before it indexed our lives—Google was a prototype with a dream. Published in the prestigious Computer Networks and ISDN Systems journal by Elsevier, this classic article explains the nuts, bolts, and brilliance behind PageRank, hyperlink analysis, and a revolutionary idea: that not all links are created equal. 🧩📈 So, how did two young researchers turn a university project into one of the most powerful tech empires the world has ever known? What secrets lie within the hyperlinks of history? And in a web where anyone can publish anything... how did Google learn what to trust? 🤔💭 ✨Huge thanks to the authors, Sergey Brin and Lawrence Page, for this visionary paper that changed the internet forever. 🎧💥 Don’t forget to subscribe to "Revise and Resubmit" on Spotify and our YouTube channel: Weekend Researcher. You can also catch us on Amazon Prime and Apple Podcasts—because great research deserves a great platform. 🌍📲🎓 🌀 So plug in, press play… and prepare to see how the web was won. 📡 Are you ready to uncover the origin story of the world’s most powerful search engine? 🕵️‍♀️💻 Reference Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer networks and ISDN systems, 30(1-7), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7552(98)00110-X Open Access paper link here Youtube channel link https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcher Support us on Patreon https://patreon.com/weekendresearcher

    37 min
  6. Rational Accidents (Downer 2024) - Weekend Book Review

    5D AGO

    Rational Accidents (Downer 2024) - Weekend Book Review

    ****************************************** It is with profound sadness that we extend our deepest condolences on the devastating tragedy involving Flight AI171 on 12 June 2025. In this moment of grief, we stand in solidarity with all those affected. Our thoughts and prayers are with the victims, their loved ones, and everyone impacted by this tragedy. ****************************************** English Podcast starts at 00:00:00 Bengali Podcast Starts at 00:15:21 Hindi Podcast Starts at 00:26:14 🎙️ Hey there, and welcome to Revise and Resubmit — this is our Weekend Book Review 📚✨ I’m so glad you’re here, because today we’re diving into a book that doesn’t just make you think — it makes you rethink everything you thought you knew about safety, reliability, and the invisible risks we’re all quietly living with. The book is called Rational Accidents: Reckoning with Catastrophic Technologies, published in January 2024 by the ever-bold and ever-brilliant team at The MIT Press. And the author? 🎓 That’s John Downer, Associate Professor in Science and Technology Studies at the University of Bristol — a scholar who isn’t afraid to peel back the polished surface of “ultra-reliable” technologies and ask the uncomfortable questions that most engineers would rather not touch. Now, imagine this: you’re flying at 35,000 feet, sipping tomato juice and flipping through a magazine, completely confident in the reliability of the machine carrying you through the sky. Why? Because planes don’t crash — or at least not often. But what if I told you that the reason they don't crash isn’t what you think? And more importantly, what if we’ve been trying to copy the wrong lessons from aviation into other high-stakes technologies — like nuclear reactors and deep-sea rigs — and failing to see the hidden cracks in the foundation? 🧠 In Rational Accidents, Downer argues that no amount of engineering genius can fully account for the unknowns in complex systems. He walks us through a sobering comparison of jetliners and other catastrophic-risk technologies, revealing how aviation’s so-called perfection masks a very different kind of reality — one built not on certainty, but on adaptation, transparency, and relentless feedback. So here's my question to you: ✈️🧨If we can’t know what we don’t know... how safe is "safe enough" — and for how long? Big thanks to John Downer and The MIT Press for making this important book open access 🙏 — because knowledge this critical deserves to be shared. If this episode sparked your curiosity, don’t forget to subscribe to Revise and Resubmit on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Amazon Prime Music, and our YouTube channel — Weekend Researcher 🎧📺🧪. Stick around. We’ve got more to unlearn. ReferenceDowner, J. (2024). Rational Accidents. In The MIT Press eBooks. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8844.001.0001 Wikipedia Contributors. (2025, June 13). Air India Flight 171. Wikipedia; Wikimedia Foundation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_India_Flight_171 Bhargava Parikh. (2025 June 13). Student Bhoomi Chauhan missed Air India crash by just minutes. BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgv26zz5wzo.amp ‌Youtube channel link https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcher Support us on Patreon https://patreon.com/weekendresearcher

    33 min
  7. A Theory of Leadership Meta-Talk and the Talking-Doing Gap (Fischer & Alvesson, 2025) | FT50 JMS

    5D AGO

    A Theory of Leadership Meta-Talk and the Talking-Doing Gap (Fischer & Alvesson, 2025) | FT50 JMS

    English Podcast starts at 00:00:00 Bengali Podcast starts at 00:22:28 Hindi Podcast starts at 00:29:51 🎙️✨ Welcome to “Revise and Resubmit” — your go-to podcast for decoding big ideas in academic research! 🎓📚 Today, we’re peeling back the curtain on leadership — not the kind you do, but the kind you talk about doing. 💬👔 Imagine a workplace where managers speak in poetic purpose about vision and values, harmony and hope — but behind that grand stage, the actual performance tells a very different tale. 🎭❓ 📖 Our episode is based on the brand new FT50 journal article titled “A Theory of Leadership Meta-Talk and the Talking-Doing Gap” by the brilliant minds of Thomas Fischer and Mats Alvesson, published on June 3rd, 2025 in the Journal of Management Studies, one of the most prestigious journals in the world of business and management. 🏆📘 This paper gives a name to the dance we often see in boardrooms and TED Talks: Leadership Meta-Talk. It's not fake, it's not always honest — it’s selective storytelling. Sometimes it's aspirational. Sometimes it's just noise. But always, it draws attention away from messy reality and into a carefully lit spotlight. 💡🎤 The authors argue that this talking-doing gap isn’t a leadership bug — it’s a feature. A systemic one. It helps managers feel good, look good, and seem like they’re doing good… even if actual change is slower, costlier, and way more complex. 🤔💼 So, here’s the big question we’re leaving you with today: If leadership meta-talk is so powerful, can real leadership ever catch up to the stories we tell about it? 🧠💥 🙏 Huge thanks to Thomas Fischer, Mats Alvesson, and the publishers — Society for the Advancement of Management Studies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. — for this thought-provoking contribution to the field. 👏📚 📢 Don’t forget to subscribe to this podcast "Revise and Resubmit" on Spotify, and check out our visual deep-dives on YouTube channel "Weekend Researcher". We're also streaming on Amazon Prime and Apple Podcast! 🚀🎧🍏 Stay curious. Stay critical. And always… revise and resubmit. 😉🔁📝 Reference Fischer, T. and Alvesson, M. (2025), A Theory of Leadership Meta-Talk and the Talking-Doing Gap. J. Manage. Stud.. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13249 ‌Youtube Channel ⁠https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcher⁠ Support us on Patreon https://patreon.com/weekendresearcher

    38 min
  8. Three Essentials for Agentic AI Security (Cin et al. 2025) | FT50 MIT-SMR

    6D AGO

    Three Essentials for Agentic AI Security (Cin et al. 2025) | FT50 MIT-SMR

    English Podcast starts at 00:00:00 Bengali Podcast starts at 00:18:52 Hindi Podcast starts at 00:26:31 🎙️✨ Welcome to another episode of Revise and Resubmit! ✨🎙️ Where academic insight meets practical brilliance — and today, we’re unlocking the doors to one of the most pressing issues of our digital age: AI security in a world of agentic intelligence. 📘 In this episode titled “Three Essentials for Agentic AI Security”, we journey through a powerful article published in the MIT Sloan Management Review — yes, that’s right, an FT50 journal 🏅— where excellence isn’t just expected, it’s engineered. 🧠 This research comes from four brilliant minds at Accenture Security: Paolo Dal Cin, the global lead at Accenture Security. Daniel Kendzior, the data and AI powerhouse. Yusof Seedat, leading thought leadership research. And Renato Marinho, master of innovation in security. Together, they present a gripping study on how AI agents, while boosting productivity across systems, can also leave gaping security holes — like a superhero forgetting to lock the fortress. 🦾🔓 The article reveals that while companies rush to integrate AI, only 42% are adequately investing in security. That’s like building rocket ships with no heat shields 🚀🔥. So what can be done? 📌 Threat modeling to anticipate vulnerabilities like data poisoning and prompt injection. 📌 Security testing to simulate attacks before the real ones hit. 📌 Runtime protection — your last line of defense in the ever-evolving digital battleground. 🛡️ A Brazilian healthcare company did it. And so can others — if they’re willing to think ahead and act fast. 👏 A big thank you to the authors and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology for making this research open access. Knowledge this crucial needs to travel far and wide. 📣 Subscribe now to our podcast “Revise and Resubmit” on Spotify, Amazon Prime, and Apple Podcasts! And don't forget to follow our YouTube channel — Weekend Researcher — for more academic gold every week! 🌍🎧📲 And before we dive in… 🤔 If AI agents are smart enough to roam free — are we smart enough to keep them safe? 🔍 Reference Paolo Dal Cin, Daniel Kendzior, Yusof Seedat, and Renato Marinho (2025, June 4). Three Essentials for Agentic AI Security. MIT Sloan Management Review. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/agentic-ai-security-essentials/ ‌Youtube Channel ⁠https://www.youtube.com/@weekendresearcher⁠ Support us on Patreon https://patreon.com/weekendresearcher

    35 min

About

In Revise and Resubmit, a dynamic AI duo— Nikita and Pavlov — guides you through the fascinating world of academic research. Whether they’re debating emerging trends, revisiting theories, or exploring the latest innovations, their conversational style makes scholarly insights accessible and engaging for academics. Papers chosen by Mayukh. Powered by Google NotebookLM.

You Might Also Like

To listen to explicit episodes, sign in.

Stay up to date with this show

Sign in or sign up to follow shows, save episodes, and get the latest updates.

Select a country or region

Africa, Middle East, and India

Asia Pacific

Europe

Latin America and the Caribbean

The United States and Canada