Developing Equity-Centered Principal Pipelines with Mark Anthony Gooden
In this episode of In the Lead with UCEA, Executive Director Dr. Mónica Byrne-Jiménez talks with Dr. Mark Anthony Gooden, Christian A. Johnson Endeavor Professor of Education Leadership, Teachers College, Columbia University, about the report he was lead author on, ‘A Culturally Responsive School Leadership Approach to Developing Equity-Centered Principals.’ and culturally responsive school leadership. Mark explores the origins, development, and impact of his report focused on anti-racist leadership and equitable educational environments. Mónica and Mark discuss critical consciousness, inclusive pedagogy, and the importance of principal preparation programs, underscoring the necessity of continuous, collaborative partnerships between universities and school districts. Mark shares how Dallas and Houston ISDs demonstrate the benefits of such partnerships, emphasizing leadership supervision, instructional leadership, and pre-service principal preparation. They also address systemic issues, such as transportation inequities affecting Latinx students, advocating for consistent equity-oriented practices and vigilant support for educational leaders at all levels. Submit your takeaways and/or questions here: forms.gle/qFEL3BMUfJnBdMoP9 In the Lead with UCEA is produced by University FM. Episode Quotes: Having critical consciousness is having an understanding of historical oppression [08:44] I tend to think about starting this conversation around an interrogation of race, because it is so interwoven into our systems, it's interwoven into our personal ways, our personal mental models or personal paradigms, but also, in our systems paradigms or our collective paradigms. So, we have to start with that critical consciousness of the leader. Like, how do they think about these systems? Do they think about these multiple levels in terms of oppression? And then, if they do, then certainly, they're going to be looking at the school systems, for instance, moving right into instructional leadership. How do they, not necessarily go around and work with their teachers and say, “I'm going to show you how to be culturally responsive,” but we would think that, with a critical consciousness lens, they can go into a classroom and see if there are inequities happening, or if there are students who are not getting access to a curriculum that represents them, if there's a curriculum that doesn't present them in a favorable light, for instance, or at all. So often, right now, we're seeing more with things like the 1619 curriculum coming out on board over the last few years, but so often, complete cultures have been left out. Or oftentimes, they haven't been left out, they’ve been misrepresented.They've been flattened, and so that they're one-dimensional. And so we said, it needs to be that they're supporting cultural-responsive pedagogy. That was very, very important. The necessity of rich research-practice partnerships to strengthen the comprehensive, aligned principal pipelines. [16:01] Some of the districts around the country have started to embrace these research-practice partnerships, right? And when we think about that, Wallace started to strongly encourage these conversations between university prep programs and districts. So, we now can theorize forward a little bit more about equity is in there, and it's, sort of, woven in between, and those folks who are hiring and selecting principals, school districts, are now looking back and saying to the university prep program, “Yes, we want the equity piece. We want to know how you're doing it,” but then I'll go a step further and say, the people that I started with, the supervisors of those principals, now have a, kind of, three-way conversation and a piece there that we can get excited about because it's more connected, it's fertile ground for, really, creating a rich research-practice partnership. And it's also something that we can have equity really nicely interwoven throughout. So, that was something that we were excited about. I mean, we didn't articulate that as well as I've just said, because obviously, I've had a couple of years since, but, obviously, one of the things that we were saying really pushed that thought directly forward to say, this is what should be in there and this is how we should be thinking about it. Is there a leveraging point to impact the whole pipeline? [22:32] I think high-quality principal preparation seems to be the biggest one if it is tightly connected to the other ones. I think we have to move away from that independent thing, because I think if you have high-quality principal preparation and you have a weak set of standards, it's going to be hard for our colleagues who are less comfortable doing this work to look at standards and see how can I be more equity-focused? It doesn't even say that in the standards, right? And even if it does, it's still like, “That's probably not speaking to me.” So, it has to be tightly connected. Show Links:A Culturally Responsive School Leadership Approach to Developing Equity-Centered Principals Guest Profile:GoodenPhD.comFaculty Profile at Teachers College, Columbia UniversityLinkedIn ProfileSocial Profile on X