Both Liz and Andrew are knowledgeable and entertaining hosts. Love the deep dives into 13th century Saxony and the fact they are definitely NOT the same age.

Fine Pod. Not normally one to be patient with podcasters. Too many are wannabe comedians, Simpsons’ addicts, Seinfeld Suckups, and/or pitching a lousy screenplay to Meir Kahane’s people. But there are exceptions. This pod is an exception. Hosts explain the law, know the process, understand the players, and refuse to suffer fools, gladly or on Ailes Spews and CNN.

Wet mouth sounds :(

I have long enjoyed the knowledge and debate among the hosts (long = Andrew had another podcast that I dropped when he left). My only annoyance had been their lawyerly belief that “the rule of law” was something real. Now, after the election they seem to be less credulous. As Liz said (paraphrasing, maybe adding a bit 😀) the law is simply what 6 partisan hacks on the Supreme Court say it is. Looking forward to their continued analysis and hoping for change in my remaining lifetime!

Andrew Torrez is a sex pest.

I am puzzled by the complete white washing of the money giver, I’m fast at sex? Are you pulling a “like a boss” move of pretending you never did that? Hi, “Alex falcone”, Chris Hopper, “Andrew Torres”.

Andrew is an utter law nerd; Liz Dye is a law school trained… she lives in the space between Dorothy Parker and Joan Rigers. Both are by pretty normal in the proffession but these guys take it to new heights. If I could only have two podcasts, this one’s a keeper.

P Andrew Torres is a sexual predator. Liz Dye got her job by harassing Torres’ accusers. You should not support these people. They are awful. I don’t want my legal analysis from people who commit and cover-up sex crimes.

This is a great podcast for up-to-date political law-talk. I especially love when Liz and Andrew completely disagree with each other and argue it out with level heads; it’s entertaining and informative.

There is no ethical standards for these two