Prof G Markets

👆🏻 That’s the first line in the podcasts About blurb below I think poor reading comprehension has people bent out of shape. Let me break this down for people complaining: 1. This podcast is about news that’s moving the markets. 2. America, most powerful governing body, is undergoing a transition of power. 3. This is news that moves the markets. 4. Scott and Ed talk about this news because it is moving the markets. 5. You all complain because Scott and Ed are talking about news that moves the markets???

I just can’t with these two anymore. I unsubscribed from Scott’s other podcasts, and now I have to let this one go, too. I’m an MBA and for years really dug the masters level analysis in Scott’s podcasts. Listening Ed and Scott cry about the election every week has become unbearable. Ed - before you ask your listeners to come to the table with objective analysis in the comment section, can you honestly say you have remained objective with your analysis? Your party lost. Get over it. Get back to what you do best.

Scott’s business insights are consistently interesting, authoritative, and self-aware. It’s why I (and I am sure most others) tune it. Unfortunately, none of those adjectives apply to his political takes…which are simplistic, emotional, and self-righteousness. Political topics also bring out the worst sycophantic tendencies of his co-host. There is a worrying trend of more politics. I hope someone Scott trusts can convince him to stick to his expertise - unique business insights!

I’ve tried multiple times but the TDS is too strong with these 2