In Re: Amazon.com, Inc., Fulfillment Center Fair Labor Standards Act and Wage and Hour Litigation

Send us a text

Host Corrie Woods interviews fellow appellate attorney Pete Winebrake of Winebrake & Santillo to discuss In Re: Amazon.com, Inc., Fulfillment Center Fair Labor Standards Act and Wage and Hour Litigation (In Re: Amazon) in which SCOPA held that an employee's time spent on an employer's premises awaiting mandatory security screening constitutes time "worked" for purposes of Pennsylvania's Minimum Wage Act, and that the maxim de minimum non curat lex, or, the law does not care for trivialities, does not apply to time worked for purposes of that Act.
 
Show Notes:

• Justice Todd's Majority Opinion
• Justice Saylor's Dissenting Opinion
•  Justice Mundy's Dissenting Opinion
• Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. Busk
• In Re: Amazon Summary and Report

Read more about In Re: Amazon and all of SCOPA's cases on SCOPAblog.

You can help us Raise the Bar for Pennsylvania Appeals by following Woods Law Offices on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn, or leave a review on Apple Podcasts.

Thanks for listening!