Inside The Newsroom

Daniel Levitt
Inside The Newsroom

Daniel Levitt delves inside the minds of journalists around the world insidethenewsroom.substack.com

  1. 09/24/2021

    Podcast #90 — Glenn Greenwald

    Hello folks, welcome to the relaunch of the Inside The Newsroom podcast! It’s been a while since I got the microphone out, but I’m back and will be podcasting with a top journalist at least monthly from now on. What better way to get back on the horse than have Glenn Greenwald on the airwaves, who the New Statesman recently described as among the greatest journalists of all time. We talked about what it’s like being Glenn, the mental toll of having the U.S. and Brazilian governments after you, the corporatization of journalism, where to start when writing a New York Times bestseller, and Glenn’s best advice for today’s journalists. Say what you like about Glenn, but it’s hard to match his achievements. He believes what he believes, and will quite literally risk his life to defend his position. “You go into journalism in order to do stories like this. If you want to be universally beloved and applauded by people in power, journalism is not the profession to choose.” Earlier this month we celebrated the one-year anniversary of our subscription model. Read all about everything we’ve done so far, and everything we plan to build over the next 12 months. And be sure to check out my Q&A with Walt Hickey, senior data editor at Insider and founder of the Numlock News newsletter. Walt was incredibly candid about what it takes to build an audience and run a profitable business. And lastly, we relaunched Data Corner and Election Dissection last week! Read about how the top newsrooms covered the Taliban’s takeover of Afghanistan from a data viz angle, as well as the latest on the consequential recent elections in Morocco and Norway. Okay, let’s do this thing! Podcast is up top, and my post-game analysis and Job Corner are down below… Enjoy! Job Corner ✍️ We have more than 2,500 jobs and more than 300 internships listed in 1,000+ cities across the U.S., UK and Canada. Below is a preview of the openings you’ll have access to when you subscribe. If you’re a paying member, your jobs sheet link remains the same each week. Interested in a free week’s trial? Reply to this email and we’ll hook you up! Who Is Glenn Greenwald? Glenn is a journalist, former constitutional lawyer, author of four New York Times bestsellers, and co-founder of the Hope dog rescue shelter. In 1996, Glenn co-founded his own law firm in New York City, concentrating on First Amendment and civil rights. In 2005, he became bored of being a litigator and travelled to Brazil to “figure out what I wanted to do with my life”. He immediately fell in love the country and met his now-husband: Brazilian congressman for the Socialism and Liberty party David Miranda. They currently reside in Rio de Janeiro. Around the same time, Glenn started his own blog and began writing about mass surveillance and the changes around civil liberties in the aftermath of 9/11. In 2007, he was hired as a columnist by Salon, and then joined The Guardian in 2012. It was there that he, along with fellow friend of the podcast Ewen MacAskill, broke arguably the most impactful scandal of this generation: The Edward Snowden CIA leaks. From there Glenn co-founded The Intercept in 2014, but resigned in October 2020 over editorial freedom. You can read all about why Glenn did so here, as well as a rebuttal from The Intercept’s editor-in-chief, Betsy Reed. Today Glenn writes about a myriad of topics on Substack, and is always an engaging follow on Twitter. Oh, he and David currently have 26 rescue dogs too. Securing Democracy and Car Wash Scandal Glenn’s latest book, Securing Democracy: My Fight for Press Freedom and Justice in Brazil, was published earlier this year. It details the events that led to Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro indicting Glenn for his involvement in the Operation Car Wash scandal, arguably the biggest corruption scandal in history. The scandal saw former Brazilian president and clear favorite in the 2018 presidential election Lula da Silva imprisoned, which allowed Bolsonaro to sweep to victory. In 2019, Glenn was contacted by Manuela d’Ávila, a centre-left candidate for vice-president in the election. D’Ávila had been approached by a source who had hacked a trove of phone calls between some of Brazil’s most powerful judges and prosecutors. One of those judges oversaw the Operation Car Wash anti-corruption probe that dominated Brazilian politics for the five years prior. The impact of Glenn’s reporting was explosive. Video: Glenn Greenwald on the Leaked Brazil Archive Exposing Operation Car Wash A judge ultimately dismissed the indictment against Glenn, but made clear that he would have accepted it, had it not been for an earlier Brazilian Supreme Court ruling. The ruling stated that any attempt to retaliate against Glenn for his reporting would be barred by the Brazilian constitution and the press freedom guarantee it provides. In our podcast, Glenn talked about how in 2013, Brazil’s parliament was favorable towards him after he exposed the U.S. government’s spying efforts on Brazil amid the fallout from the Snowden CIA leaks. But as Glenn’s husband poignantly pointed out, the Car Wash scandal was completely different and presented more dangers. Aside from now having a truly authoritarian president after him, this time around the folks coming after Glenn were on his doorstep. Having not one but two national governments after you is pretty terrifying, and one can only wonder about the mental toll that will have. The book is a timely reminder of the fragility of democracy. Corporatization of Journalism Glenn’s been a writer for the better part of three decades. As anyone who’s followed his work will know, he argues vehemently against the corporatization of newsrooms — the move toward an increasingly corporate ethos and structure. That’s why he co-founded The Intercept — to become an adversarial newsroom and not a subservient one — and is why he’s now completely independent on Substack. But you haven’t had to be in the game as long as Glenn to witness what he’s talking about. Large corporations have taken advantage of overall falling revenue in journalism, and have applied their ideology of cutting costs to boost profit. The Hussman School of Journalism and Media at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill found that the total number of newspaper owners has declined by 32 percent since 2004, or at an average of 100 newspaper companies per year. More than 2,000 newspaper titles are now owned by the largest 25 companies. I have a whole newsletter worth of thoughts on this, so I’ll spin them into a separate edition in the future. As you know, I experienced this corporatization first hand through my time at the Wall Street Journal. After slaving away for years building myself a voice and trying to help the journalism community, WSJ gave me a choice: shut down Inside The Newsroom or leave. As Glenn put it, journalism isn’t a profession as much as it is a tool for anyone to fight injustice. There shouldn’t be a credential system whereby only those from the richest and most established media organizations have the privilege to cover the most important stories. And inside newsrooms, journalists’ voices shouldn’t be silenced because of hierarchy. Journalism is, and should continue to be, accessible to everyone. Glenn’s Advice For Journalists We’ll finish with some advice from Glenn for today’s journalists. I asked what his top piece of advice is to navigate today’s industry, and have paraphrased his answer below. There are a lot of easier ways to earn a living other than being a journalist, especially with the industry’s economic struggles. So make sure you’re entering journalism because of passion. Whether that’s politics, culture, sports, social movements or whatever your thing might be. But passion alone won’t necessarily bring you the success you’re looking for, and along the way you’ll inevitably have to sacrifice something. For many, that means working for an institution. That’s okay and is just something you have to do while you build your audience and pay the bills. But no matter what you do, make sure you always remember and preserve that passion that animated your choice to enter journalism. And even in those dark times of sacrifice, safeguard that passion with everything you have to keep that flame alive and to keep feeding it. Your time will come, so be passionate and prepared for when that time does come. Thanks for making it to the bottom. If you enjoyed today’s newsletter and podcast, please consider supporting what we’re building at Inside The Newsroom. 🙏 This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit insidethenewsroom.substack.com/subscribe

    51 min
  2. 12/01/2020

    🎧 #89 — Olga Khazan (The Atlantic)

    Hello folks! Happy December and welcome to another episode of Inside The Newsroom, where today’s guest is Olga Khazan! As you might know, The Atlantic is my favourite news outlet of them all, so it was an absolute delight to speak to Olga about covering health, gender and science, what it’s like behind the scenes at one of America’s oldest publications, and we discussed her awesome new book, Weird: The Power of Being an Outsider in an Insider World. Be sure to check out last week’s content including our podcast with Mr. Hurricane Man Josh Morgerman, as well as Inside The Middle East and Picks of the Week, where we rounded up the reactions to U.S. secretary of state Mike Pompeo’s likely last visit to the Middle East, and visited New Zealand where geologists hope to harness heat from volcanoes to fight climate change. Okay, let’s get to today’s newsletter! Job Corner More than 1,000 full-time journalism jobs and internships waiting to be applied to at the likes of the Boston Globe, BuzzFeed News, the Charlotte Observer, The Athletic, The Guardian, the Texas Tribune and the Washington Post. Keep spreading the word 🙏👇 Preview of the job board… 👇 Who is Olga Khazan? Olga has covered health, gender and science for The Atlantic since 2013, and has also written for the likes of the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times and Forbes. She was born in Russia and moved to the U.S. with her family when she was just three years old, initially living in Los Angeles before settling in Midland, Texas. On many occasions, Olga found herself on the outside, unable to fit in with her American counterparts. Her experiences fuelled much of the motivation and content for her new book Weird: The Power of Being an Outsider in an Insider World, which explores the social and psychological concepts behind conforming to new groups and societies. As if that wasn’t enough, Olga recently joined Substack where she posts insights from the book, as well as other smart life advice, which we’ll get onto shortly. Olga 👇 Long Live The Atlantic If you’re a frequent reader of this newsletter, you’ll be familiar with my obsession with The Atlantic and know that it’s my favourite newsroom. The way they dissect and explore the most important issues less than 24 hours after an event is unequalled and, as Olga puts it, her and her colleagues tell the “second day story on the first day”. From its humble Boston roots in 1857, to its many journalists in multiple states in 2020, The Atlantic has blessed the world with some of its most defining articles. Whether it was W. E. B. Du Bois’ “The Strivings of the Negro People” in 1897, which introduced the idea of the African American’s experience of “double consciousness” that’s still talked about today; Helen Keller’s 1932 “Put Your Husband in the Kitchen” where she encouraged men to do more housework way ahead her time; Martin Luther King Jr.’s 1963 “Letter From Birmingham Jail” that would serve as one of the defining texts of the civil-rights movement; or modern-day great Ta-Nehisi Coates who in 2014 wrote “The Case for Reparations”, The Atlantic has been leading public debate for centuries. Long may it continue… Support Independent Journalism Hey there, each podcast episode and newsletter takes around 12 hours to put together. If you’ve enjoyed today’s episode, please consider subscribing so we can continue delivering you the most important news from around the world 🙏 You’re Weird 🤨 No you’re weird! Shut up Daniel… Weird was released in April and is the finished product of more than five years of research and writing. The book explores the science behind being an outsider and why being culturally, socially, physically or mentally different should be a badge of honor instead of a slur. Olga isn’t alone. There’s a little weirdness in all of us, but it depends on how brave and willing we are to embrace it, which is why I’m so pleased Olga had the curiosity and courage to explore the psychological links between her upbringing as a Russian immigrant in West Texas, to her struggles and successes in later life. The book also explores why humans crave conformity, the consequences of social rejection and the hidden upsides of being “weird”. Just ask Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta aka Lady Gaga who was bullied in high-school and university for being too eccentric. Or Alan Turing, who was ridiculed at school for his unconventional behaviour but went onto help save the world from Adolf Hitler. If you’re a fan of this stuff and can’t get enough, both Olga and I strongly recommend Susan Cain’s Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can't Stop Talking. Idiosyncrasy Credit Idiosyncrasy Credit is an old psychological concept that describes how someone’s unusual personality or ideas will be more accepted if that person is first seen as a conformist to a group’s norms. At the most basic level, most people use this technique subconsciously when trying to make new friends. But the concept can be applied to a plethora of scenarios including in the workplace. For example, when I interviewed for my job at The Guardian and most recently at The Wall Street Journal, I focused on my ability to turn new and unusual ideas into appropriate stories for their respective audiences. When I got the job, instead of heading straight for a new Google doc to brainstorm the wackiest ideas I could think of, I needed to show my colleagues that I could conform to their workflow and help improve their existing ideas. Now that I’ve shown them (I hope) that I’m capable of step one, it’s time to experiment, which means get ready for stories on tornadoes, tornadoes, tornadoes (only half joking). Another area where idiosyncrasy credits can be used is dating, which friend of the podcast Amy Webb outlined in her book Data, A Love Story: How I Gamed Online Dating To Meet My Match. To help her find the one, Amy scouted her competition on various dating apps by recording the profile bios of hundreds of other women looking to court the attention of men. She found that the average profile description should be between 90 and 100 words, be as common and unspecific as possible, and one that avoids controversy. Once you show these prospective men and women that you’re semi-normal, then you can start to be yourself. Related Podcasts That’s all for today, see you Wednesday for some Inside the Middle East fun! 👋 This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit insidethenewsroom.substack.com/subscribe

    41 min
  3. 11/24/2020

    #88 — Josh Morgerman (Hurricane Man)

    Hello folks and welcome to another episode of Inside The Newsroom, where today’s guest is the hurricane man himself, Mr. Josh Morgerman. I had Josh and his director Caroline Menzies on the pod last year to talk about their hit TV show, Hurricane Man (highly recommended watch) which followed Josh to the world’s most remote places during the infamous 2018 cyclone season. This time around Josh’s setup was dramatically altered by Covid-19, so we caught up on this year’s hurricane season of which he spent in Mississippi. As ever be sure to check out last weeks’s coverage outside the newsroom, with Inside The Middle East and Picks of the Week. And if you’re a fellow weather geek, enjoy some of my previous podcasts… Job Corner We finally did it, 1,000 journalism jobs and internships! This week’s new postings feature the likes of CNN, the Economist and the Wall Street Journal. Keep spreading the word! 🙏 👇 Data Corner * Cyclone Activity: Real-time data for all major ocean basins around the world, from Colorado State University Who is Josh Morgerman? Josh was born and raised in New York, studied history at Harvard and now resides in L.A. where he runs his own branding consultancy company. Yes, not the typical route to becoming one of the world’s leading storm chasers. As Josh puts it, he was born to chase, which is why Josh has spent the past few months in Bay St. Louis in Mississippi, so that he’s just a drive away from this year’s hurricane action amid international travel restrictions. In non-Covid years, Josh has travelled to some of the most remote areas in the world to capture valuable data for scientists and academics to study. Josh has been chasing storms for the best part of the past 30 years, but it was last year that shook him to his core. Chasing the most powerful hurricane on record to make landfall in North America led Josh to the Bahamas, where he intercepted Hurricane Dorian head on. When the worst of the storm had passed, not much was left standing, and there was a gut-wrenching 48-hour period when no one could reach him and he was presumed dead. While Josh didn’t study meteorology in college, he’s certainly a student of the field, so we’ll quickly run through some key terms we’ll use in today’s newsletter… Correction: I originally stated that Hurricane Dorian was the most powerful hurricane on record. It’s not. It’s the most powerful to make landfall in North America. The Hurricane Man 👇 Quick Glossary What’s the difference between a cyclone, hurricane and typhoon? A cyclone is the generic term for a rotating storm, and also the name given to large-scale rotating storms in the Southern Hemisphere. Under that generic label we have hurricanes, which are large-scale rotating storms in the North Atlantic and the Northeast Pacific, while a typhoon is the equivalent for large-scale rotating storms in the Northwest Pacific. What is Accumulated Cyclone Energy? Commonly known as ACE, it measures multiple metrics including wind speed and the number of days a storm lasts in order to give an overall impact. What are the different cyclone basins? The major ocean basins include the North Atlantic, Northeast Pacific, Northwest Pacific, North Indian, South Indian and South Pacific. What Are the Differences Between the Northern and Southern Hemispheres? Key differences between the north and south include the time of year each has its season: In the north typically between June and November, and in the south typically between December and April. Cyclones in the north rotate counterclockwise, and clockwise in the south due to the Coriolis effect. Support Independent Journalism Hey there, each podcast episode and newsletter takes around 12 hours to put together. If you’ve enjoyed today’s episode, please consider subscribing so we can continue delivering you the most important news from around the world 🙏 Record Year in the Atlantic Now that we know that there are multiple ocean basins around the world, let’s take a look at this year’s activity in each so far. You may have heard that the 2020 North Atlantic season has seen a record number of named storms — a storm with winds of at least 39mph — with 30, beating the previous record of 28 set during the ominous 2005 season. What also sets 2020 apart is the fact that we’ve seen a category 4 hurricane in four consecutive months (August to November). Two more notable anomalies from this season: The last time we saw two hurricanes in November was in 2001, which saw a category 4, and two category 1s including Olga that dipped her toe into December (also extremely rare). Fast forward to 2020 and the category 4 Hurricane Eta and category 5 Hurricane Iota both followed almost identical paths and slammed into Nicaragua, adversely affecting the likes of Honduras and El Salvador as well. While the National Hurricane Center is watching a disturbance currently trying to form, fingers crossed we can close the book on the 2020 North Atlantic hurricane season. What About the Rest of the World? While the Atlantic has seen several records broken, overall activity in the Northern Hemisphere this year has been below average. The good folks at Colorado State University track activity in all the world’s major ocean basins, and thankfully the number of storms and ACE (see glossary above) is way down in the Northeast Pacific, which experienced its highest ACE on record in 2018, and the Northwest Pacific, which saw an insane five typhoons last year in November alone. Elsewhere, the Southern Hemisphere’s cyclone season is just starting… Climate Change? It’s the elephant in the room any time there’s a major hurricane, and it would be extremely negligent not to discuss climate change any time there’s a severe weather event. But that’s where things become extremely complex and we must contextualize wherever we can. The first thing we must decipher is the difference between meteorology and climatology, which are intertwined yet fundamentally different. Meteorology is the study of weather, most often on a day-to-day or even season-by-season basis. For example, we know that there were a record number of named storms in the Atlantic this year. Climatology, on the other hand, is the study of meteorology over an extended number of years. In order to conclude whether climate change makes hurricanes worse, we must look at long-term trends, including of the individual ingredients of a hurricane, which I did for the Guardian a couple of years ago. Now, with that information, we still cannot definitively say any one hurricane (or any weather event) is directly linked to climate change, yet. But what we can conclude is that climate change is making monster storms such as Eta and Iota from this year, or Florence and Dorian from last year, much more likely. Friend of the podcast and legendary climate scientist Michael Mann has written about this very issue, as have many others. Only time will tell if the trend continues… That’s all for today! See you tomorrow for Inside The Middle East! 🌍👋 This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit insidethenewsroom.substack.com/subscribe

    52 min
  4. 11/03/2020

    🎧 #86 — Dalal Mawad (Associated Press)

    Hello folks! Happy U.S. election day and welcome to another episode of Inside The Newsroom! Best of luck to everyone voting today, I’ll be following along every step and making a whole lot of charts along the way! Before I do, I can’t wait to share my conversation with Dalal Mawad, senior producer and correspondent for the Associated Press, and perhaps the most accomplished guest at such a young age we’ve ever had on the podcast. I was also joined by Aina, my very first co-host, as we learned from Dalal what it was like living and reporting through the huge chemical explosion in August, and how the heck the country escapes its deep political and economic crises. Be sure to check out last week’s episode with New York Times editorial writer Binyamin Appelbaum, who took us inside what it was like to interview the Democratic presidential candidates last year, his views on news reporting vs opinion journalism, and what policies are needed to solve the harshest income inequalities highlighted by Covid-19… 👇 I’m still figuring out next week’s guest, so until then, enjoy this week’s… 🤓 Job Corner We upped our game to add almost 200 new postings to the job board, taking our total to 900! Help us out be spreading the word! Data Corner * Refugees: Database on the world’s refugees, from the UN * Protests: Global mass protest and conflict data, from ACLED Who is Dalal Mawad? Dalal was born and raised in Lebanon and has carefully observed everything that’s happened in her country over the past 15 years. She graduated with a bachelor’s in economics from the American University of Beirut, a master’s in international political economics from the London School of Economics, and a master’s in journalism from Columbia. Oh, she also happens to be fluent in English, Arabic, French and Spanish. I’m not jealous at all… Dalal covers the entire Middle East and North Africa region, and has reported on several wars and other disasters in the past, including Syria’s civil war and Palestine’s humanitarian crisis. Before the AP, she reported for the UN, Al Jazeera, and the New York Times. She’s also the recent winner of the Samir Kassir Award, the MENA region's most prestigious journalism award, for her feature on Lebanon’s drag performers. Dalal 👇 Blast Investigation Update Tomorrow marks three months since one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in history, at a warehouse in the Port of Beirut that killed more than 200 people and ripped the city to shreds. Political interference and a seriously flawed judicial system mean we still don’t have answers on who was responsible. Calls for an independent international investigation were discarded as a waste of time by President Michel Aoun, making a credible and impartial domestic investigation seemingly impossible. Two fires that broke out on September 8 and September 10 prompted allegations of evidence tampering, and as of October 13, reports say 25 people have been arrested in relation to the explosion. But the authorities have failed to publicly detail any evidence, and not a single minister has been questioned as a suspect. Meanwhile the FBI has also failed to conclude what caused the blast, and U.S. government sources have suggested the blast was an accident. The country’s economic and political woes mean there’s simply not enough money to compensate the people of Beirut, as outlined in Rania’s tweet below… Crisis No. 1: Politics Lebanon’s political and economic crises are directly linked and haven’t appeared overnight. Before we dive into where the economy stands, let’s recap a tumultuous 15 years that is the root for most of the country’s problems… 2005: Prime Minister Rafik al-Hariri is killed in a car bomb, killing 21 others. Hezbollah enters government for the first time. 2006: Hezbollah goes to war with Israel, which kills 1,200 Lebanese in five weeks. 2008: Diplomatic relations with Syria are established for the first time since both countries gained independence in the 1940s. 2011: The government of Saad al-Hariri, son of former PM Rafik al-Hariri, quits over the UN-backed trial that indicted four senior Hezbollah members over the killing of Rafik. Syria’s civil war erupts and Lebanon begins taking in refugees and asylum seekers. 2012: Syria’s conflict spills into Lebanon with deadly clashes between supporters and opponents of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. Syria fires rockets into Northern Lebanon. 2015: Beirut’s main landfill site is closed without an alternate location arranged, sparking mass protests over rotting waste in the streets. The situation is perfectly summed up by chants of “You stink!” aimed at the government. 2016: Saad al-Hariri returns as PM, but tenders his resignation a year later over ties with Saudi Arabia, and then rescinds it a month later. 2019: al-Hariri quits for real, and more protests start over a government move to tax internet calls. 2020: al-Hariri returns for a third time and has the near-impossible job of healing deep economic and political wounds, after two more prime ministers come and go. Crisis No. 2: Economics A plethora of reasons are responsible for why Lebanon’s economy has collapsed, so we’ll run through some of the top-level causes and consequences. By some measures, the country is in its worst ever economic crisis: Government debt has soared to record levels and interest payments on that debt represent around half of all state revenues, one of the highest in the world. Also separating Lebanon from most countries is its hyperinflation, which soared to 112 percent this year, meaning the country has moved into uncharted territory similar to Venezuela. The situation has been exacerbated because the U.S. dollar, of which Lebanon’s economy relies so heavily on, has appreciated against the Lebanese pound so much that Lebanon’s buying power has decreased to the point that the pound is practically worthless. Because dollars have become so scarce, banks are preventing people from withdrawing their money. International aid given to Lebanon has skyrocketed since the onset of the Syrian civil war in 2011, which has seen Lebanon take in around 1.5 million refugees, leaving only Aruba to host more refugees per capita. And in the aftermath of August’s explosion, the bulk of pledged foreign assistance is conditional on major political reforms, which haven’t yet taken place. Credit: Amnesty International What’s Next for Lebanon? Good question and one that we can only speculate over. Lost in the economic and political woes is the pandemic, which sees Lebanon’s daily cases and deaths continue to soar. Just when you think it can get any worse, new basement levels keep on appearing. Dalal wrote for the AP on what she thinks will happen next, so I’ll let you read that, as well as what my WSJ colleagues think could happen… Credit: Worldometers That’s all for today. See you tomorrow for Inside The Middle East 👋 This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit insidethenewsroom.substack.com/subscribe

    45 min
  5. 10/05/2020

    #82 — Louise Story (Wall Street Journal)

    Hello! Welcome to another episode of the Inside The Newsroom podcast. It’s been a while since we hit the airwaves, but now that the paywall is up and the bulk of the world’s elections are completed, I plan to bring you a podcast every week until Christmas. Leading things off is my colleague Louise Story, The Wall Street Journal’s Chief News Strategist and Chief Product and Technology Officer. We talked about how Louise rose through the newsroom, a couple of crucial management concepts she learned at business school, and the emergence and future of strategy within journalism. We also mentioned the rise of newsroom strategy jobs, so I’ve listed below a selection of relevant postings we recently added to the job board. Tomorrow marks the 10th anniversary of the launch of Instagram, so take a read of this masterpiece by The New Yorker’s Jia Tolentino on The Age of Instagram Face. As ever, thank you for supporting the newsletter. You are literally the ones that make it happen. 🙏 Job Corner Full-Time * Business Insider — Editorial Subscriptions Strategist — New York * Politico — Product Manager — Arlington, VA * The Economist — SEO Manager — London/New York * The Independent — Product Manager — London * The New York Times — Product Designer — New York Internships * Business Insider — Social Media Fellow — London * Dallas Morning News — Audience Engagement Intern — Dallas * Philadelphia Magazine — Audience Development Intern — Philadelphia * Spectrum Networks — Product Intern — Colorado * The Texas Tribune — Engagement Fellow — Austin Who is Louise Story? Louise is currently The Wall Street Journal’s Chief News Strategist and Chief Product and Technology Officer. She returned to WSJ two years ago having interned there in the summer of 2004, and previously spent the bulk of her career at The New York Times in various reporting, editing and strategic positions. Before all of that, Louise put the time in to acquire the necessary skills and knowledge in the classroom, gaining a bachelor’s degree in American Studies from Yale, a master’s in journalism from Columbia before returning to Yale for an MBA. She now leads a team of more than 150 people at the Journal known as DXS — Digital Experience & Strategy — all working toward the goal of making WSJ more of an audience-focused newsroom. Perhaps her largest project to date was orchestrating a content review that involved reading more than 7,000 articles in two weeks to understand what type of content resonates most with readers. Like most of us, Louise didn’t get to where she is without the help of others, which is why she’s making herself available on her personal email to answer questions about her career, the future of strategy and journalism, and how to get involved with DXS at the Journal. Email her below… 👇 Louise 👇 The Rise of Strategy in the Newsroom Strategy within journalism is nothing new, at least it wasn’t for well-functioning newspapers before the advent of the internet. Without reducing newsrooms’ old strategy to a single line, it was largely “maximise reader engagement in order to maximise newspaper sales,” and that often fell to marketing and sales teams while reporters and editors concentrated on what they did best. Healthy revenues from a combination of advertising and newspaper sales likely made strategy relatively seamless. Then came the Dot-Com boom in the mid-to-late-90s, which saw most newsrooms, including The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and The Guardian, launch their websites, and suddenly journalists were forced to think about reader engagement and then social media when Facebook and Twitter became mainstream around 2010. What’s different in today’s newsrooms is the pace of technological change and number of threats from technology companies — In 2000, newspapers and magazines held half of all advertising spending, but that share has since declined to less than 10 per cent, with the likes of Google and Facebook swallowing the bulk of that, according to GroupM, a WPP-owned media agency. In order to survive, newsrooms have been forced to think like these tech giants, whether it’s implementing subscription models or hiring data scientists and UX designers to study their users. What’s most exciting is the fact that this section of the newsroom is still fledgling, highlighted by Louise’s transformation of the DXS team, which wasn’t a thing just two years ago. Whether it’s at the WSJ or elsewhere, there’s probably never been a better time to enter the strategic field. Related Podcasts #74 — Major Garrett (CBS News) #70 — Amy Webb (Future Today Institute) #67 — Sarah Nöckel (Femstreet) Are You a Book Quitter? Managing and setting goals for more than 150 people is no joke, heck, having the time to meet your own daily and weekly targets is hard enough. That’s why Louise is exceedingly aware of the sunk cost concept, the idea of accepting an amount of time or money has already been spent and cannot be reclaimed. For example, have you ever bought a book and realized within the first couple of chapters that this particular book just isn’t for you? Yeah, we all have, but are you the person to stop there and move onto another one, or is the fact that you’ve spent $10 or £10 on it enough to keep you reading even though finishing the book will offer little value? That doesn’t mean to say you should never finish anything. Our best work often takes hard work, dedication and a bloody long time to complete. But that’s where the more stories and projects you work on, the better your judgement will be in assessing which ones you should see through to the end, and which ones are just a drain on resources. I’ve found that since I started working in data journalism, which has involved a lot of coding and formulas, my decision making is a lot more like a computer algorithm, which brings us onto our next section… Thinking Like a Computer I started studying data journalism five years ago and have worked with datasets containing up to a million records. For most projects, there’s simply not enough time to manually observe what’s on each row of a spreadsheet, plus that’s just really boring. So I’ve had to learn some programming languages in order to automate the task of sorting and analyzing these large datasets. Part of that process has involved writing effective algorithms, which only work if you tell the computer exactly what to do and exactly when to do it. If you’ve worked with code before, you’ll be familiar with if/else statements. For those that haven’t, an if/else statement is simply a way to make decisions based on different conditions. For example, if tomorrow’s weather forecast is sunny, I’ll go for a walk in the park, but if tomorrow’s weather turns out to be anything else, I’ll stay home and be a lazy ass. This is a very simple yet effective way of “computational thinking”, and thinking like a computer has many other benefits… Perhaps most beneficial for me has been the ability to eliminate as much emotion as possible when making decisions, just like a computer. For example, I deal with breaking news a few times a week. If I let my emotions — fear of failure, imposter syndrome, hunger — drive my decision making, my work would suffer. Instead, as soon as I’m handed an assignment, I write down the first handful of things I need to do, and out of those I decide what needs to be done in which order to complete the job as quickly and to the highest quality as possible. All I’m doing is creating an algorithm. Additionally, making decisions rationally and level headed before they have to be made — for example before a big meeting with your manager — can be crucial in not letting yourself make dumb choices based on too many emotions swirling inside your brain. I’ve touched on all of the above in the past with two legendary psychologists and behavioural economists, Cass Sunstein (Harvard University) and Art Markman (University of Texas), which you can listen to below… Louise’s Predictions for the Future Louise had several thoughts on what the future for journalism might hold. One of which was the choice media brands will be forced to make between having their content distributed by third-party platforms or keeping all of it in-house on their own websites. So what does Louise mean by that? Well, we’re certainly going to continue to see the likes of WSJ and The Guardian keep the bulk, if not all, of their content hosted on their own websites. And maybe we’ll see more subscription partnerships similar to the one The Washington Post and the Financial Times launched recently. But doing so means it’s essential to know everything about your users, which is of course not an easy thing to do. The BBC found that out the hard way by spending £10 million/$13 million on rebranding its suite of podcasts and radio shows into BBC Sounds, and is now facing a review by Ofcom over complaints it has squeezed out its competition. The alternative looks something like the recent $100 million/£82 million Spotify will pay Joe Rogan to exclusively license and host all of his podcasts on its platform. While that’s obviously not possible for everyone, more platforms such as Luminary, which also pays podcasters to exclusively host their content, have sprung up. Another of Louise’s predictions is the acceleration of artificial intelligence and computational journalism in creating tools to not only make reporters’ jobs easier, but also to enhance the overall storytelling experience for readers. In fact, I had one of Louise’s former WSJ colleagues on the podcast a few months ago, Francesco Marconi, who left the Journal in February to launch his own company, Applied XL, which develops new data tools to track the health of people and places around the planet. 👇 That’s all for this week. If you e

    49 min
  6. 07/21/2020

    #80 — Cass Sunstein (Harvard University)

    Hello! Welcome to another edition of Inside The Newsroom, as we welcome in Cass Sunstein, a professor at Harvard Law School and one of the foremost behavioural economists to have ever lived. Cass has a new book out in September called Too Much Information, which explores the theory that when information is positive, we eat it up, but when it’s negative we don’t want to even hear it. In the podcast, we dissected his 2008 book Nudge, which still has great influence more than a decade later. Before we do, I wanted to honor the passing of another legend to have walked this planet. Congressman John Lewis passed away over the weekend at the age of 80. John was an absolute icon when it came to civil rights, and carried the torch lit by Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks well into the 21st century. Rest in peace, Congressman. Sharing Is Caring Podcasts are fun. I love doing them. But they take a bloody long time to put together. I estimate a single hour podcast and newsletter takes around 12 hours to put together. So how about a cheeky share to show your appreciation? Please and thank you. 🙏 Job Corner The job board has been updated and this week’s deadlines include jobs at CTV, the Financial Times, Newsquest, Poynter, the Pulitzer Center and the City NY. Spread the word. 🤜🤛 Who is Cass Sunstein? Cass is considered one of the smartest behavioural economists and legal scholars on the planet. He’s the founder and director of the Program on Behavioural Economics and Public Policy at his alma mater, Harvard Law School, the author of dozens of books — one of which (Nudge) is the subject of the podcast, and was the administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs from 2009 to 2012 in the Obama administration, of whom he became friends with during their time together at the University of Chicago. I’ve followed Cass’ work for a long time, so it was an absolute treat to hear him speak at the London School of Economics back in January on his then latest book How Change Happens (more on that later). Nudge Together with Richard Thaler, Cass co-authored perhaps his most influential book, Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Published in 2008, the book describes the theory that almost all decisions we make in life, whether it’s where and when to buy a house or even as small as picking what to have for lunch from a restaurant menu, are influenced by the decisions and frames, or “nudges”, made by other humans, aka “choice architects”. For example, would you go bungee jumping if the instructor told you there was a 90 percent chance nothing bad would happen? Probably. But what about if the instructor told you there was a 10 percent chance you’ll die if you jump? Probably not, right? The book was well-received among free market policy makers as a way to increase economic activity. But you can apply the theory in almost every aspect of life, such as where in a new school an architect chooses to place the bathroom will determine how often students go to the toilet. Cass and Thaler have been heavily influenced by another pair of behavioural scientists, Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman, whose friendship helped shape the world we live in today… The Undoing Project The friendship between Tversky and Kahneman is among the most important in recent history, and was excellently chronicled by author Michael Lewis in The Undoing Project: A Friendship that Changed the World. Lewis documents how the two Israeli psychologists identified in the late 1960s how humans tend to make decisions based on emotion over rationality — see Moneyball. Before Tversky and Kahneman, not much was known about why we make the decisions we do, and their work has since influenced most, if not all, behavioural economic theory we have today, including that of Cass and Thaler. Check out Lewis speak about the book and friendship to Malcolm Gladwell below… Related Podcasts 🎙️ #61 — Rachel Botsman (University of Oxford) on issues with trusting people and the media #58 — Art Markman (University of Texas) on knowing ourselves and the power of introversion #44 — Sebastian Junger (Tribe, The Perfect Storm) on how some humans are addicted to war because it unites them How Change Happens As mentioned earlier, I was lucky enough to catch Cass speak at the LSE about his latest book on how social change happens. Why is that after around 150,000 years that we Homo Sapiens have occupied this planet, that it took until the early 19th century for women in many countries to vote? And how did the social movement that led to women in Saudi Arabia being able to vote in 2015 even start? Once we understand what’s happened in the past then we can begin to dismantle other archaic and repressive policies around the world. Check out Cass’ talk by clicking on the button below… What is Luck? So many of our decisions influenced by other people. Cass elicits that 100 percent of our decisions are controlled by choice architects, whether it’s intentional or not. It raises the question of whether luck is real or a fictional concept we’ve made up over past centuries and millennia. The answer to this question depends on the situation. According to Merriam Webster, luck is “the events or circumstances that operate for or against an individual”. So let’s break it down with a few examples personal to me, but please apply to your own circumstances as we go along… Let’s start with how I believe I got my current job at The Wall Street Journal. Back in February, a member of the graphics team got in touch about a possible opening and told me I should apply. One might call that lucky, but said member follows this very newsletter and thus was familiar with my work. They wouldn’t have been if I hadn’t published this newsletter, so I don’t think my new job was down to luck. That’s something I indirectly controlled, i.e. the quality and quantity of my work. But there are still many things that I’ve had zero control over. The most prominent in all of our lives are things such as which country we’re born in, our sex at birth and what name our parents give us. We have absolutely no control over any of that, which means that some degree of luck is involved that’ll determine where we live, how much money we’ll earn and whether we’ll face a lifetime of racism or not, for example. In what ways has luck played a part in your lives? The Future of Behavioural Economics Tversky and Kahneman only started to theorize in the late 1960s, which makes the field of behavioural economics incredibly young. Already in the past half a century, we’ve learned so much about ourselves and how our brains are wired. As we head into the next 50 years, Cass fully expects the explosion of knowledge to continue at a rapid rate. He referenced books such as Scarcity: Why having too little means so much, which explores why people in difficult circumstances tend to make objectively bad decisions. For example, why is it that people in poverty don’t take advantage of opportunities to save when they can? Why are poor people perceived as less capable than rich people? I know a lottttt of wealthy folks that are stupid asses! Now that we have a decent understanding of how our brains work, we can continue to build from Cass’ work and apply this knowledge to improve people’s lives. Cass referenced the idea of getting rid of the ‘sludge’ — he apologized for the similar-sounding name to this book, Nudge — to make our lives far easier. Sludge is the burdens and hoops institutions make us jump through in order to complete important and sometimes trivial tasks. For example, to my knowledge Transport For London don’t tell you if you’ve crossed into a congestion charge zone — it costs at least £15 to drive in certain areas in central London — which is a form of choice architecture that has created ‘sludge’ for drivers in not knowing whether they need to pay. And in the U.S., the process of finding a healthcare provider, filling out the forms and receiving a payout is a tedious task created by humans that can be easily avoided. Now that we know sludge exists and we have a snazzy word for it, we can figure out ways to reduce it. See you later this week… 👋 This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit insidethenewsroom.substack.com/subscribe

    43 min
  7. 06/16/2020

    #79 — Janelle Shane (AIWeirdness.com)

    Hello! Welcome to another edition of Inside The Newsroom! Today’s podcast is the first in a while, so it felt great to get back on the horse and devour some knowledge. Today’s guest is Janelle Shane, research scientist in artificial intelligence, and author of the recently-published You Look Like a Thing and I Love You, a book about the weirdest artificial intelligence out there. We got into all sorts of AI questions and even had a discussion on trucks with giant testicles dangling down from the back of them, so whatever you’re into there’s something for everyone. In all seriousness, AI is crucial yet so misunderstood, so I’m hoping the podcast above and newsletter below go some way in breaking down barriers for understanding its place in this world. Enjoy 🤓 Job Corner Several deadlines coming up in the next few days, including at CBC, ITV, The Independent and The Texas Tribune. Check out almost 400 active journalism jobs, internships and freelance contracts. Please spread the word. Who is Janelle Shane? Janelle is a research scientist specializing in artificial intelligence, TED2019 speaker, and author of You Look Like a Thing and I Love You, a book on how AI works and why it’s making the world weirder. The book is an expansion of Janelle’s popular blog, aiweirdness.com, which makes fun at some of the stranger AI trends and innovations, like cockroaches being able to masquerade as giraffes to fool security. Janelle’s also written for The New York Times, Popular Science and Slate. Buy the book 👇 ❤️Like What You See?❤️ Each podcast and newsletter takes about 12 hours to put together, so please like this edition of Inside The Newsroom by clicking the little heart up top. That way I’ll appear in clever algorithms and more people will be able to read. Cheers. You Look Like a Thing and I Love You Janelle published her first book late last year titled You Look Like a Thing and I Love You, a book on how AI works and why it’s making the world a weirder place. Maybe it’s me and the line of work I’m in, but AI is more often than not associated with negatives, such as machines taking our jobs, racist algorithms, or fatal self-driving cars crashes. While there’s certainly cause for concern over the outcomes of machines overstepping the mark in terms of invading our privacy and threatening our security, it’s of course us humans programming AI that’s the problem. In the same vein, Janelle looks at some of the weirder AIs that humans have created, such as truck nuts… Truck nuts you ask? Yeah I did a double take too. One of the things I love about America is some people’s inability to control their testosterone, and the latest way this group of people are displaying their manliness is by dangling a pair of giant testicles from the back of their trucks. But in fine fashion, the AI from a Tesla recently recognized the oversized nuts as a traffic cone, a beautiful reminder of AI’s naivety and that we can all reduce some individuals with overflowing arousal to a traffic cone. What is Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning? Pinching this next bit from my podcast with Francesco Marconi, former R&D Chief at The Wall Street Journal and now co-founder of Applied XLabs. The never ending rise of power and influence of technology companies in our lives means we hear and read about terms such as artificial intelligence and machine learning seemingly every day. AI as we know it arguably started in the first half of the 20th century, just as computers were gaining steam. While AI and ML are closely linked and overlap in many ways, they are different. Artificial intelligence is: The overarching umbrella term for the simulation of human intelligence in machines programmed to think like humans and mimic our actions. Whereas machine learning is: The concept that a computer program can learn and adapt to new data without human interference. Machine learning is a field of artificial intelligence that keeps a computer’s algorithms current regardless of external changes. For example, autocorrect or self-driving cars. Essentially, you need AI researchers to build the smart machines, and you need machine learning experts to make them super intelligent. You can’t have one without the other. Is AI Misunderstood? 🤔 This is a question that’s been rattling around my brain for months now, and is one I’m starting to understand better the more I dissect its pros and cons. Like many of you reading, I got swept up in the fear and hysteria over automation eliminating up to 800 millions jobs in the next decade, paranoid that the machines are coming to get us! Like with most things in life, the more I learn about AI and the more experts I talk to on the podcast, the more I realize that AI can and should be a helluva lot less intimidating than it’s currently perceived. Two main factors come to mind that give AI a bad name. Firstly, as we discussed earlier, when AI does bad things, whether it’s intentional or unintentional, human decisions are behind it, such as the Chinese government’s decision to spy on its citizens and give everyone a social credit score based on trivial offences such as jaywalking. Automation has shaped economies for centuries. Whether it was the Industrial Revolution in the 18th and 19th century that sent factory production soaring, or the invention of the internet that has all but killed off the printing press, people have lost jobs due to machines for as long as we can remember. But that’s not the problem — free markets will always endeavour to find savings. Which brings us onto the second point. The problem has been dormant governments failing to react quick enough to changing industries, if at all. Across the Midwest and South, economic wastelands have sprung up over the past decade because federal and state governments failed to reinvest in these communities through teaching people necessary skills, and through a lack of incentive to keep innovative companies at home. And in the UK, jobs left empty because of Brexit will ironically be filled by robots. Until we truly understand what automation is and what it can do, the stigma around AI will only become dirtier. Credit: Axios 👇 Which Country Is Best At AI? Like with most areas of life, I love a good bloody index to show who’s better than who on a particular subject. While rankings are just rankings, they do provide a decent snapshot of which country prioritises certain issues over others. When it comes to AI, Tortoise Media’s index looks at the level of investment, innovation and actual implementation of AI by country, while Stanford University’s index looks at the vibrancy of each nation including public perception and societal considerations. Unsurprisingly, the U.S. and China, the world’s two largest economies, are number one and two on both indices. Source: Tortoise Media 👇 Delving into the U.S. deeper, researchers at Stanford concluded that while larger states with the biggest economies may not be at the top of the standings in terms of AI job growth, that’s because they’ve already had their AI surge. It’s part of the reason they’re still at the top. Oil also helps… Talking of which, oil-rich states such as North Dakota and Wyoming have seen AI jobs in their states boom of the past decade, and goes to show that you don’t need to be in California or New York to jump into AI. Related podcasts… #77 — Francesco Marconi (Newlab) on artificial intelligence and its role in the future of journalism #72 — Ryan Broderick (BuzzFeed) on the 15th anniversary of YouTube #70 — Amy Webb (Future Today Institute) on the lack of government preparation for the coronavirus and the latest 2020 technology trends #61 — Rachel Botsman (Trust Issues) on the why people believe fake news Last week … 🇺🇸 America's Protests: We Must Now Focus on Voter Suppression Thanks for making it all the way to the bottom. Please like and share this edition of Inside The Newsroom by clicking the ❤️ below. That way I’ll appear in clever algorithms and more people will be able to read. If you haven’t already, please consider subscribing to get a newsletter about a cool news topic in your inbox every time I publish (1-2 times a week). You can find me on Twitter at @DanielLevitt32 and email me corrections/feedback or even a guest you’d like me to get on the podcast at daniellevitt32@gmail.com. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit insidethenewsroom.substack.com/subscribe

    52 min
  8. 05/15/2020

    #78 — Mark Gamba (U.S. House Candidate)

    Happy Friday folks, and welcome to another edition of Inside The Newsroom, where today we’ll have the latest in our series of candidates running for public office. This time it’s the turn of Mark Gamba, who’s vying to represent Oregon’s 5th district in the U.S. House of Representatives. Mark’s biggest test won’t be November’s general election, instead it’ll be Tuesday’s Democratic primary where he must topple 12-year incumbent Kurt Schrader, who’s one of the most senior Democrats in the country. We got into how the race has changed since going 100 percent digital amid the coronavirus lockdown, as well as how Mark’s 30-year career as a photojournalist exposed him to some of the worst effects of climate change, and how the emergency is fuelling the world’s wars and mass migration. Up top is the podcast, down below is the post-game, but first my picks of the week and today’s Job Corner. Enjoy! 🤓 Picks of the Week * How To Get Away With Murder — Goodbye to one of the most complex black women on TV 🥂 * Buzzfeed, Quartz — Buzzfeed announced it’s shutting its UK and Australian newsrooms, and Quartz is laying off 80 people * MoMA — Explore 139,000 artworks displayed in the Museum of Modern Art with this spectacular interactive visualization Job Corner Lots of deadlines this weekend for more than 350 active journalism jobs, internships and freelance gigs. Companies include the Associated Press, Bloomberg, the Financial Times, Politico Europe and Telemundo. Spread the word far and wide! Like Me, Please Before you read on, please like this edition of Inside The Newsroom by clicking the ❤️ up top. That way I’ll appear in clever algorithms and more people will be able to read. Cheers. Who is Mark Gamba? Mark is a former photojournalist of 30 years who decided that journalism wasn’t enough, and turned to public service to make a bigger impact. He became mayor of Milwaukie, Oregon, a city of around 20,000 people in 2015, and won reelection in 2018. Having worked with the likes of National Geographic and Sports Illustrated, Mark’s work took him to all parts of the U.S. and rest of the world, exposing him to different cultures, languages and the harsh reality of climate change. It’s why he believes he’s the right person to represent Oregon’s 5th district in the U.S. House of Representatives in November. Mark’s biggest test will be to defeat incumbent Democrat Kurt Schrader, who was first elected in 2008, in Tuesday’s primary. Schrader won 87 percent of the Democratic vote in 2018, but Mark’s challenge is the most serious Schrader’s received in years, and his centrist position could land him in trouble amid the age of growing left-wing populism in the U.S. History of Oregon Politics Oregon is a blue stalwart on paper, having voted for a Democratic president in every election since 1988. But as we’ve discussed tirelessly in this newsletter, there are endless nuances under the hood/bonnet in each state, whether it be the weirdness of West Virginia’s state legislature, or the fact that Maine has voted for a Democratic president in every election since 1992, but hasn’t had a blue U.S. Senator since 1995. In Oregon, the intrigue stems from the fact that in 2016, voters turned out for the two main parties in their lowest percentage in 20 years, when third-party candidate Ross Perot won nine percent for his Reform Party, after he won 24 percent in 1992. This could mean that Oregonians are tired of the same old two-party system and are ready for new leadership, meaning the five sitting U.S. Representatives, who have a combined 97 years of service, could be in trouble come November. Balancing Budgets In Milwaukie, Mark and his team have done their best to offset the immediate and future financial losses his city’s workers and businesses will suffer due to the coronavirus. But Milwaukie just isn’t big enough to have the money saved in its coffers to deal with such a crisis. The same can be said of many states, who are beginning to struggle to foot the bill of unemployment claims due to the millions of layoffs and furloughs in recent months. A report by Tax Foundation shows that several states have enough money saved to survive several months, and Wyoming’s estimated to be able to cover its people for more than six years. Meanwhile the likes of California, Texas, Kentucky, Ohio, New York and Massachusetts can only afford to pay out unemployment benefits for up to seven weeks. Credit: Tax Foundation Unlike the federal government, states are legally required to balance theirs budgets, which is why the likes of New York, California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, West Virginia, Texas, Massachusetts and Ohio have filed for federal financial help. Additionally, the coronavirus shutdown could cost the U.S. economy half a trillion dollars, and that’s probably a conservative figure. It will likely be years before the U.S. economy recovers, if at all, and will likely take an unconventional shape economists are calling the Swoosh Recovery. States therefore face inevitable cuts on a mass scale to foot the bill. What Can We Learn From the New Deal? Amid the current financial chaos, many are calling for countries around the world to adopt a New Deal-style financial program to re-stimulate their economies and get people working again. The latest figures show that unemployment’s soaring around the world, and could rise to 25 percent in the U.S., according to Goldman Sachs. During the darkest days of the Great Depression in 1933, unemployment rocketed from 3 to 25 percent, forcing newly elected President Franklin D. Roosevelt to unleash a series of government-funded programs and projects not seen before. While the economy received the shot in the arm it so desperately needed and many credit FDR for shortening the duration of the Great Depression, the jury is out on what impact his actions really had, with the Dust Bowl lasting the majority of the decade. In South Korea, a ‘Tech New Deal’ will fund 5G networks and AI development. In the UK, GDP fell 2 percent in the first three months of the year, and significant government spending is needed to jump start the economy after more than a decade of meagre growth. And some members of the European Parliament have called for an ambitious plan centered around new green jobs. Unlike the aforementioned countries and regions, the U.S. has a forthcoming general election, which could mean a stimulus package that will actually benefit the people might not be implemented for another year, deepening the woes of people across the country. Migration and War are Fuelled by Climate Change Mark’s travels exposed him to parts of the world that many of us will never experience, which is why he’s so knowledgable about the effects of climate change. More than a million people migrated from the Middle East and parts of Africa to Europe in 2015, sparking an influx of people not seen on such a scale since records began, overwhelming many countries in the process. In 2018, a so-called “Migrant Caravan” of more than 7,000 Central Americans arrived at the U.S.-Mexico border after months of travelling up from the likes of Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador. Many migrants flee their home countries because of persecution, poverty and violence, but what’s often lost is that it is climate change that’s fuelling the majority of the problems such countries are facing. Credit: United Nations There are currently around 71 million displaced people around the world, a figure the UN forecasts could be anywhere between 24 million and 1 billion by 2050. Imagine that, around one tenth of the world’s population could be a forced migrant because climate change has made parts of this planet completely inhabitable. Unfortunately we’re living in a vicious feedback loop, whereby the worse climate change becomes, the more wars it’ll spark, driving more migration until the cycle repeats itself. As climate change ramps up its next attack on the planet, we can only expect more deadly wars and migrants dying as a consequence. Related podcasts… #73 — Nick Rubando (U.S. House Candidate) on running for the office for the first time and why Midwestern politics is so weird #68 — Mckayla Wilkes (U.S. House) on taking on No. 2 House Democrat Steny Hoyer and why the U.S. needs Universal Basic Income #64 — Paula Jean Swearengin (U.S. Senate) on West Virginia’s devastating opioid crisis, and what it’s like running for the U.S. Senate This week… #77 — Francesco Marconi (Newlab) on artificial intelligence and its role in the future of journalism … Last week… #76 — Betsy Sweet (U.S. Senate Candidate) from Maine on her race with Susan Collins, and a look at the history of campaign finance laws in the U.S. #75 — Alex Schiffer (The Athletic) on the grind of making the jump from local to national journalism Thanks for making it all the way to the bottom. Please like and share this edition of Inside The Newsroom by clicking the ❤️ below. That way I’ll appear in clever algorithms and more people will be able to read. If you haven’t already, please consider subscribing to get a newsletter about a cool news topic in your inbox every time I publish (1-2 times a week). You can find me on Twitter at @DanielLevitt32 and email me corrections/feedback or even a guest you’d like me to get on the podcast at daniellevitt32@gmail.com. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit insidethenewsroom.substack.com/subscribe

    50 min

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
4 Ratings

About

Daniel Levitt delves inside the minds of journalists around the world insidethenewsroom.substack.com

To listen to explicit episodes, sign in.

Stay up to date with this show

Sign in or sign up to follow shows, save episodes, and get the latest updates.

Select a country or region

Africa, Middle East, and India

Asia Pacific

Europe

Latin America and the Caribbean

The United States and Canada