U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Oyez

4,7 (620)
ГОСУДАРСТВО
ЕЖЕНЕДЕЛЬНО

Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.

-3 ДН.

Barnes v. Felix

A case in which the Court will decide whether courts should apply the “moment of the threat” doctrine when evaluating an excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment.

1 ч. 16 мин.
-3 ДН.

Cunningham v. Cornell University

A case in which the Court will decide whether a plaintiff can state a claim under a provision of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) that bars a plan fiduciary from knowingly engaging in a transaction that is an exchange of goods or services between the plan and anyone barred from doing business with the plan, simply by alleging that such a transaction occurred.

1 ч. 31 мин.
-4 ДН.

Food and Drug Administration v. R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co.

A case in which the Court will decide whether a manufacturer may file a petition for review in a circuit where it neither resides nor has its principal place of business, if the petition is joined by a seller of the manufacturer’s products that is located within that circuit.

1 ч. 12 мин.
-4 ДН.

McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corporation

A case in which the Court will decide whether, under the Hobbs Act, a federal district court is bound by the Federal Communication Commission’s legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

1 ч. 14 мин.
15 ЯНВ.

Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton

A case in which the Court will decide whether a Texas law that requires any website that publishes content one-third or more of which is “harmful to minors” to verify the age of each of its users before providing access should be subject to “rational basis” review or “strict scrutiny.”

2 ч. 6 мин.
14 ЯНВ.

Thompson v. United States

A case in which the Court will decide whether 18 U.S.C. § 1014, which prohibits making a “false statement” for the purpose of influencing certain financial institutions and federal agencies, also prohibits making a statement that is misleading but not false.

1 ч. 17 мин.
14 ЯНВ.

Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.

A case in which the Court will decide whether a voluntary dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 is a “final judgment, order, or proceeding” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b).

49 мин.
13 ЯНВ.

Hewitt v. United States

A case in which the Court will decide whether the First Step Act’s sentencing reduction provisions apply to a defendant whose original sentence was imposed before the Act’s enactment, then vacated and resentenced to a new term of imprisonment after the Act’s enactment.

1 ч. 31 мин.

См. все (72)

4,7

из 5

Оценок: 620

A Delightful window into the Supreme Court

02.07.2024

GCChaser

This easy to use podcast should be required listening for all Americans. Listening to the oral arguments not only provides an education into how the process works but also provides a view into how the justices approach very complex cases.
Untimely

08.11.2024

PuPower

It bothers me that it takes so long to get the arguments. There are other pods that post the next day. Why should I follow this pod.
Simple podcast but exactly what i need

29.02.2024

XheanortXIII

Thank you for what you do
I enjoy listening to the arguments

05.03.2023

perdiemmedic

And then listening to companion type podcast who discuss and give context

Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.