Born Free Method: The Podcast

Nathan Riley
Born Free Method: The Podcast

The institutions and individuals who run the world would like you to believe that you are powerless. That there's nothing you can do to improve the wellbeing of your family. That you aren't smart enough to understand shmancy science stuff. That eating and living well is too hard for most...so why try? That exercising your rights to informed consent and refusal is irresponsible. That having a birth on you terms, in your own home would be incorrigible. That pregnancy is a disease and childbirth is a medical procedure. That your symptoms are "all in your head". That cervical cancer is an inevitable consequence of HPV infection. They're wrong. Welcome to your revolution. nathanrileyobgyn.substack.com

  1. Preterm Labor: Prevention and Management

    HACE 6 DÍAS

    Preterm Labor: Prevention and Management

    This summary covers:- Prediction and Prevention of Spontaneous Preterm Birth - Practice Bulletin #234 - Published August 2021- Management of Preterm Labor - Practice Bulletin #171 - Published October 2016 Prediction and Prevention Five Pearls * PTD at * History of PTD is the greatest risk factor for PTD in a current pregnancy * Progesterone supplementation can be considered regardless of history of PTD * In patients w/ singleton pregnancy and history of PTD, cerclage should be offered if CL * Omega 3s, low-dose aspirin, lifestyle modification, and smoking cessation are also important considerations in decreasing our national PTD rate Background * rates of preterm delivery in the U.S. has been pretty stable * "Although risks are greatest for neonates born before 34 weeks of gestation, infants born after 34 weeks of gestation but before 37 weeks of gestation are still more likely to experience delivery complications, long-term impairment, and early death than those born later in pregnancy" * risk factors for PTD: prior PTD (1-2x ↑ risk), short cervical length (if no history of PTD; if prior history), vaginal infection in pregnancy, vaginal bleeding in pregnancy, UTI in pregnancy, or periodontal disease in pregnancy (treatment of any of these won't normalize risk, though), low maternal BMI, smoking, substance abuse, and short inter-pregnancy interval * in case you were wondering, history of LEEP of CKC for cervical dysplasia has not been found to be a risk factor after all according to ACOG but there are studies that support this (and my own direct clinical experience reflects the alternative) * White women have the lowest rate (9.3%), Hispanic women (10%), American Indian and Alaskan native (11.5%), Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander (11.8%), with highest rates seen among black women (14%) Who should be screened and how? * the purpose of screening is to identify patients in whom intervention will be helpful * really the only patients who qualify for screening are those with a history of prior PTD, PPROM, multiple gestations, but ACOG feels it’s reasonable to screen universally as 5% of all women could potentially give birth preterm * a systematic review looked at 14 studies and found that: “a cervical length less than 25 mm before 16-24 weeks of gestation had a sensitivity of 65.4% for preterm birth before 35 weeks of gestation, with a positive predictive value of 33.0% and a negative predictive value of 92.0%. Sub-analysis of the studies that included only women whose risk factor was prior spontaneous preterm birth found a similar sensitivity and a positive predictive value of 41.4%” * get a baseline transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) and repeat this evaluation every 1-2 weeks to assess for change (limited data on time interval) * measure three times, and go with the average * "fetal fibronectin screening, bacterial vaginosis screening, and home uterine activity monitoring have been proposed to assess a woman’s risk of preterm delivery" and none of them have panned out as useful predictors of PTD in asymptomatic women * recent data suggests that it might actually be cost-effective to universally screen for shortened cervix in patients without history of PTD (study 1, study 2), but, for now, ACOG states it's reasonable to offer but not necessarily recommended universally When and how to prevent PTD? No history of PTD * Extensively studied as a means to reduce the risk of preterm birth in asymptomatic women with a singleton pregnancy, short cervix, and no prior preterm birth. * a meta-analysis of five randomized trials of vaginal progesterone versus placebo in patients with a singleton pregnancy, a short cervix, and no prior preterm birth was performed, including patients from the 2019 OPTIMUM (Does Progesterone Prophylaxis to Prevent Preterm Labour Improve Outcome?) trial who did not have other risk factors, and standardizing the threshold definition of shortened cervix at 25 mm or less for their analysis. Patients treated with vaginal progesterone had a significantly reduced risk of any preterm birth before 34 0/7 weeks of gestation (14.5% versus 24.6%; RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.44–0.82), spontaneous preterm birth before 34 0/7 weeks of gestation (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44–0.88), neonatal respiratory distress, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. The meta-analysis authors calculated that 14 patients would need to be treated to prevent one spontaneous preterm birth before 34 0/7 weeks of gestation. * Vaginal progesterone is recommended for asymptomatic individuals without a history of preterm birth with a singleton pregnancy and a short cervix. 200 mg per vagina nightly is the best studied regimen History of PTD: * Before the PROLONG trial (2020), a metaanalysis was published in 1990 that showed demonstrable evidence of the benefits of 17-OH-P in preventing recurrent PTD, which led to a large multicenter RCT of 463 patients. They were randomized to receive either 250 mg 17-OHPC IM or placebo, starting between 16 0/7 and 20 6/7 weeks of gestation. Administration of 17-OHPC reduced the rate of preterm birth before 35 weeks of gestation by one third, leading ACOG and SMFM to recommend this intervention universally to women with history of PTD. * Then came the PROLONG trial, which evaluated the efficacy of 17-OHPC 250 mg intramuscular injection weekly compared with placebo on preterm birth and neonatal morbidity among women with a singleton pregnancy and prior spontaneous preterm birth. Large, international, multicenter double-blind RCT. 1740 women randomized (of 1877 eligible). No statistical difference found in the two primary outcomes of preterm birth before 35 0/7 weeks of gestation or maternal/neonatal outcomes. * On April 5, 2023, the FDA withdrew its approval of 17-OHP for prevention of preterm birth as a result of the PROLONG trial * Data comparing vaginal to IM progesterone supplementation continues to roll in, so no definitive conclusions can be made yet * In the meantime, SMFM discourages clinicians from using IM 17-OHP off-label * Recommended to screen cervical length every week from 16-24 weeks and to offer cerclage if it measures * it may be more cost effective to forego cervical shortening screening altogether in those without this history Cerclage * Short cervix found on ultrasound: uncertain effectiveness in patients with a short cervix and no history of preterm birth. However, there is evidence of potential benefit in patients with a very short cervical length (* Open cervix on physical exam: Individuals with cervical insufficiency based on a dilated cervix on a digital or speculum examination at 16 0/7–23 6/7 weeks of gestation are candidates for a physical examination-indicated cerclage (but data is mixed) * unclear if 17-OH-P plus cerclage are additionally helpful together compared to either intervention alone * An interesting side note: there’s no evidence, per say, that suggests that it’s a terrible idea to place an US-indicated cerclage after 23 6/7 weeks; this is merely “expert opinion” * Because cervical insufficiency traditionally is defined as painless cervical dilation in the 2nd trimester, this restriction presented no issue when viability did not begin until the 3rd trimester and indeed may have arisen to discourage the treatment of patients with threatened preterm labor with cerclage * But now that we have better means of keeping 23+ weekers alive in the NICU, it seems that little investment has been made to prevent babies from coming super early * What if a specific institution doesn’t have the full capacities for keeping these very preterm babies alive? Should we not then consider an early 3rd trimester cerclage? Why not? Very little data to continue this conversation…(much of this is paraphrased from a bada$$ article that was recently published in the Green Journal) Notes on cerclages... There are three indications: * Ultrasound-indicated: what we've already described * History-indicated: cerclage placed at conclusion of first trimester and after prenatal screening has been completed in patients with cervical insufficiency * Physical exam-indicated (e.g. rescue cerclage): option if cervical dilation >2cm is visualized on speculum exam or ultrasound There are three techniques (all call for Mersilene suture): * McDonald: performed vaginally under regional anesthesia using the purse-string technique at the cervicovaginal junction; bladder emptying is recommended, but mobilization is not required * Shirodkar: performed vaginally under regional anesthesia using purse string technique after emptying and mobilizing the bladder * Transabdominal: performed laparoscopically or open, placing the suture in purse-string fashion at the cervicoisthmic jxn (**will require c-section); recommended if vaginal placement is determined not possible or if cervix is too short that vaginal effort is unlikely to be successful If a patient has a cerclage in place and presents in active labor, you must remove the cerclage to avoid cervical laceration, which can lead to outrageous brisk bleeding (you can't stop active labor) Other options * if birth was preterm due to other comorbidities, low-dose aspirin has been demonstrated in some studies to prevent preclampsia and thus prevent indication for iatrogenic preterm birth * tighter control over BPs in cHTN may also decrease our PTD rates * presence of funneling hasn't been found to significantly influence the risk of PTD * "indomethacin or antibiotics, activity restriction, or supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids have not been evaluated in the context of randomized trials for women with short cervical length, and are not recommended as clinical interventions for women with an incidentally diagnosed short cervical length." * stop smoking * omega 3 fatty acids show some promise (2018 Cochrane review) * decreasing allostatic load (think: improve our racist, inegalitarian society) * treat UTIs and vaginal infections when they arise *

    1 h y 8 min
  2. Lahnor Powell, ND, MPH

    12/12/2024

    Lahnor Powell, ND, MPH

    Dr. Powell is a naturopathic physician with her master’s degree in public health. She’s a doula, as well, as she has a wealth of knowledge when it comes to interpreting stool analyses and supporting the gut in pregnancy and postpartum. We met when I called Genova Diagnostics for support in interpreting a client’s GI Effects stool analysis. Now we’re friends, and I wanted to share her with the world. Speaking of stool analyses, the reason that I prefer GI Effects is because I have run all of the major stool analyses (GI-Map, GI360, etc.), and GI Effects found several problem areas that were missed by the others. GI Effects gives you an impression of the degree of inflammation in the gut, pancreatic function, gut flora, presence of parasites, and digestion and absorption of proteins/fats/carbs. Plus, when I started running these analyses on clients, I loved that I was able to arrange for consults with Genova consultants to go deep into the results. In this conversation, Dr. Powell teaches me about: * What can a stool analysis tell you about your health? * What is the optimal frequency and consistency of poop? (We say poop a lot in this episode…try to get over it) * What might reflux or bloating tell you about your gut function? * How do you select a probiotic? * What role does diet play in gut health? * What role does the gut play in hormone health? * How can you optimize gut function in pregnancy and postpartum? * Chiropractics and gut function * Calcium D-Glucarate, vitamins, fermented foods, milk thistle, and more… We go deep in this one. Enjoy. Find Lahnor Powell, ND, MPH on Instagram. Her practice is called Okana Care. Notes for this episode Work with Nathan: Beloved Holistics | Born Free Method | Clear & Free | Twins-Breech Training Medical Disclaimer: Born Free Method: The Podcast is an educational program. No information conveyed through this podcast should be construed as medical advice. These conversations are available to the public for educational and entertainment purposes only. Music provided by AudioKraken / Pond5 Get full access to Born Free Method: The Podcast at nathanrileyobgyn.substack.com/subscribe

    1 h y 21 min
  3. Kelly Ruef, ND

    26/11/2024

    Kelly Ruef, ND

    I’ve been interpreting DUTCH tests for a few years, and it seems that the rabbit hole gets deeper and deeper. If you work with women as a practitioner, you need at least be aware of DUTCH. Using urine metabolites (DUTCH Complete and Cycle Mapping) or salivary metabolites (DUTCH Cortisol Awakening Response), I am able to get a bird’s eye view of how the adrenals, ovaries, and liver are working in sync to support the overall wellbeing of my female clients from the standpoint of hormone production and detoxification. No test is perfect, but a multiple-day collection is nearly always superior to lab draws in my functional medicine practice. Kelly Ruef, ND, is one of the clinicians on-staff at DUTCH, and she helps people like me interpret client results. On a recent call, I invited her to come share some insights about DUTCH with you, and this is the conversation that ensued! Enjoy! Here are some sample reports for DUTCH Complete, DUTCH Cycle Mapping, and DUTCH Cortisol Awakening Response in case you want a visual aid as you listen to this conversation! Notes for this episode are found on Substack Work with Nathan: Beloved Holistics | Born Free Method | Clear & Free | Twins-Breech Training Medical Disclaimer: Born Free Method: The Podcast is an educational program. No information conveyed through this podcast should be construed as medical advice. These conversations are available to the public for educational and entertainment purposes only. Music provided by AudioKraken / Pond5 Get full access to Born Free Method: The Podcast at nathanrileyobgyn.substack.com/subscribe

    1 h y 16 min
  4. Tony Ebel, D.C.

    01/11/2024

    Tony Ebel, D.C.

    I invited Tony Ebel, DC, interactive chiropractor and founder of PXDocs, to come speak to my Born Free Method community members because he’s brilliant. But he’s not just brilliant, he’s also awesome. Tony is the sort of guy with whom I could enjoy a bourbon and talk about my vulnerabilities as a father, the cult of medicine, and difficulties in my relationship. He’s a regular guy… But from this regular guy, I’ve gained some incredible insights about what he calls the “perfect storm”. When I say insights, I mean validation. We met through an Instagram post that I posted a year or so ago in which I presented the story of a woman who had a child with autism spectrum disorder, and she was asking me if thought that perhaps a hypoxic injury in her birth could have caused the autism. While I don’t believe that a hypoxic injury alone could be responsible (and proving that would be impossible), I did consider the influences of the myriad of other stressors put on little babies and whether these stressors, in combination, might overwhelm an already fragile nervous system within a baby that experienced relative hypoxia during childbirth. Tony jumped on that post, and we’ve been friends every since. I soon found myself on one of his live webinars where he discusses how the combination of environmental toxins, poor co-regulation with the parents (e.g. long NICU stay), subluxation during birth, or the myriad of issues related to cesarean birth might impact a child’s lifelong health. And even better: what to do about it. You might be thinking, “What business does a chiropractor have in speaking about birth?” Well, like other chiropractors who have come on the podcast such as Elliot Berlin, Lindsey Cantu, and Kaleb Valdez, these practitioners often have to fix the problems that we generate through our overly-interventive approach to childbirth in the conventional model. They are sounding an alarm…and we have been slow to respond. There was a recent post on another OBGYN’s Instagram page meant as an eye-roll in response to another chiropractor’s suggestion that perhaps cesarean birth might impact how the sutures of the fetal skull and its orientation around the vertebral spine through the atlas and cervical spine might impact a child’s health. I commented with the suggestion that perhaps we should listen to what he has to say rather than discount is completely carte blanche because he isn’t an OBGYN. I got trashed. But I ask Tony about this hypothesis in this interview, and he unpacks it beautifully. Perhaps there is a reason that baby’s do better - on average - when born vaginally versus abdominally? What do we have to lose through consideration of the myriad of issues that c-section might cause, especially given that we can all agree that 37% of babies being born in our country by c-section is problematic? In this conversation with Dr. Ebel, we also discuss the ideal timing and frequency of newborn chiropractic care (spoiler: immediately), issues with vertebral joint subluxation, the neuroendocrine-immune (NEI) system, PANDA/PANS, and laying a healthy foundation for our kiddos through proper nutrition and life modification. Disclaimer: This episode is not meant to demonize c-sections or OBGYNs. It’s a call to action to reserve the operating room for only the necessary cesareans…and most of the c-sections women are undergoing aren’t necessary. And often they were provoked by a laundry list of interventions, perhaps also unnecessary in most cases. If you had a c-section - or end up having a c-section - Tony has some advice for you, too! This interview was conducted in front a live audience with Born Free Method Community members, so there’s also a lively Q&A throughout the conversation. Our community gets back-stage access to all of these interviews. Consider joining us so that you don’t miss out! Find Dr. Ebel and his cadre of awesome practitioners at PXDocs.com. Check out his amazing podcast “ExperienceMiracles™”, on which I was a recent guest. And you can learn more about him on Instagram. I just launched a special program that starts in 7 weeks, which is directly related to nervous system regulation. Your body is an instrument, and the sounds that it creates can have a host of influences on your physiology, which is ever-the-more-important in childbirth. This 40-day 1st chakra chanting program start in January, and it’s a courageous collaboration with Maryn Azoff, of Vocal Transformation. Learn more about this program HERE. We are limiting the spots to 100 people (a couple counts as one). When you are ready to enroll, go HERE. Notes for this episode are found on Substack Work with Nathan: Beloved Holistics | Born Free Method | Clear & Free | Twins-Breech Training Medical Disclaimer: Born Free Method: The Podcast is an educational program. No information conveyed through this podcast should be construed as medical advice. These conversations are available to the public for educational and entertainment purposes only. Music provided by AudioKraken / Pond5 Born Free Method: The Podcast is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Born Free Method: The Podcast at nathanrileyobgyn.substack.com/subscribe

    56 min
  5. Miscarriage and Pregnancy Loss: What's Egg Quality Got to Do With It?

    30/10/2024

    Miscarriage and Pregnancy Loss: What's Egg Quality Got to Do With It?

    This story is often the same. Positive pregnancy test. Excitement.Go to your OBGYN.Sterile, crinkly paper.Phallic probe in the vagina.Then you wait…What do you see, doc? Is there a heartbeat? Is everything ok?Even in your 20s, your fecundity, a fancy term for “the likelihood of conceiving on any given cycle”, is around 20%. Instagram and Facebook would have you believe otherwise, but the fact remains: not every pregnancy goes the distance.Is something wrong with me, doc?What did I do wrong? ”Oh no, honey,” the good doctor says, “This happens all the time. Just keep trying…”You wipe up all of the goo and get dressed, holding back the tears until you’re safely in your car, shielded from all of the happily pregnant couples in the waiting room.While miscarriage is relatively common, it hits harder when it happens again, and again, and again, especially when you aren’t given any tools or insights as to why or how it keeps happening to you. Your mom told you that you were special, but you don’t want to be special in this way. I’m joined today on the podcast with the two founders of WeNatal, my preferred prenatal vitamin company. In this conversation, they’ll speak to the void in conventional maternity care that leaves so many couples feeling hopeless and unsupported by their doctors, and they have a product that might be a step in the right direction…WeNatal offers his and her prenatals, fish oil, and a new “egg quality” supplement, and I’ve been passing them all out like candy to my Born Free Method community members and others who seek me out for guidance. Using THIS LINK, with any prenatal purchase, they’s throw in a bottle of their DHA Plus (fish oil) at no charge. Their egg quality supplement contains five potent mitigators of oxidative stress: acetyl L-carnitine, Coq10, PQQ, NAC, and ALA. When combined with a sound prenatal, this supplement provides every reassurance that you are doing everything in your power from a supplement standpoint to improve the quality and function of your precious eggs. And the same goes for the guys and their sperm… If you’d like comprehensive support from pre-conception through postpartum, check out the Born Free Method. When you enroll, you score free samples of WeNatal’s his/her prenatal vitamins, and you get lifetime access with direct support from me and Sara Rosser, CPM, my co-creator. Lifetime. Access. Direct. Support. There’s nothing like it.Sara and I have a free pregnancy loss program that we are offering as well in the event that you want some support specific to your loss, miscarriage, or ongoing challenges with pregnancy. Notes for this episode are found on Substack Work with Nathan: Beloved Holistics | Born Free Method | Clear & Free | Twins-Breech Medical Disclaimer: Born Free Method: The Podcast is an educational program. No information conveyed through this podcast should be construed as medical advice. These conversations are available to the public for educational and entertainment purposes only. Music provided by AudioKraken / Pond5 Born Free Method: The Podcast is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Born Free Method: The Podcast at nathanrileyobgyn.substack.com/subscribe

    47 min
  6. Screening for Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities

    27/10/2024

    Screening for Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities

    Pairs well with the 2021 Russian River Pinot Noir Davis Family Vineyards  Five Pearls 1. Cell-free DNA screening has the best sensitivity and specificity of all screening methods. But before you order it, it's best to get a prenatal ultrasound 2. Best non-cell-free screening modality is the sequential integrated serum screen (1st-tri serum + NT ultrasound + 2nd-tri serum) 3. Formal anatomy survey should be offered at 18 - 22 wga; can identify soft markers for T21 and T18 4. Prenatal genetic screening should be offered to all pregnant women regardless of risk profile 5. Anything that doesn't add up, it's best to just refer to a genetics counselor or even your friendly MFM for clarification. The (very) Basics of DNA and Reproduction * apart from RBCs and cornified cells of your skin, hair, and nails, every one of your body's cells has a nucleus * gametes (sperm or ova) are haploid, meaning their nuclei contain 23 chromosome * somatic cells are diploid, meaning their nuclei contain 23 pairs of chromosomes (46 chromosomes total) * when a sperm meets an ovum, magic happens! * the sperm fertilizes the egg to create a zygote: the 23 chromosomes of the sperm combine with the 23 chromosomes of the ovum * for the next 24 hrs, the zygote undergoes rapid, mitotic division ("cleavage"); after about 100 cells have been formed, it's called a blastula * the total mass of the original zygote has not changed, it has merely divided, and each individual cell is called a blastomere * the blastula consists of a spherical layer of cells called the blastoderm surrounding a yolk-filled cavity called a blastocoel. * in mammals, the blastoderm arranges itself into an inner and outer layer of cells, the embryoblast and trophoblast, respectively. The former will go on to form the fetus, the latter the placenta. Illustration credited to Libretexts.org (click image for source) * the embryoblast undergoes gastrulation, where it rearranges itself into three germ layers: endoderm, mesoderm, and ectoderm, and the fetus gradually develops from here * any chromosomal defect - whether parts missing, extra copies, or missing copies - can lead to abnormalities in the development of the fetus Illustration credited to Libretexts.org (click image for source) Epidemiology of chromosomal abnormalities * chromosomal abnormalities are found in 1-in-150 pregnancies * they are more common in the 1st trimester (aneuploidies are the most common reason for early pregnancy loss) * incidence of aneuploidies increases proportionately with maternal age and presence of a paternal chromosomal abnormality or translocation * Trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) is the most common chromosomal aneuploidy among live infants (1-in-700 live births) * although risk of aneuploidies correlates w/ maternal age, most T21 kids are born to young women because overall, young women have more children than older women * Trisomy 18 (Edward syndrome) is the 2nd most common (1-in-3000) * Trisomy 13 (Patau syndrome) is the 3rd most common (1-in-6000) * the most common sex chromosome aneuploidy is 47, XXY (Klinefelter syndrome), which is seen in 1-in-500 males * the only viable monosomy is 45, X (Turner syndrome), which is seen in 1-in-2500 females and is unrelated to maternal age * unlike aneuploidies, copy number variants are independent of maternal age * a copy number variation is a type of duplication or deletion event that affects a considerable number of base pairs within a chromosome; it can be detected on microarray * in pregnancies where the mom is age 36 or less, microarray abnormalities are more common than aneuploidies * prenatal genetic screening should be offered to all pregnant women * if a screen is positive, diagnostic testing should be offered Single time point screening approaches Cell-free DNA screening * can be used as early as 9-10 wga * can detect sex of fetus * genetic material is found in maternal circulation * derived from placental trophoblasts * in pregnancy, of the cell-free DNA found in maternal circulation, 3-13% is fetal in origin (increases as pregnancy advances) * most sensitive and specific for common aneuploidies * sex chromosome results for patients who have undergone organ transplant will be affected by the sex of the organ donor so not recommended for these patients * overall best screen: 98-99% sensitivity for T21, T18, T13; 0.13% combined false positive rate (also extremely low false negative rate) * before you send a cell-free DNA screening, best to get a prenatal ultrasound to (1) confirm dating, (2) detect obvious fetal anomaly, (3) detect presence of multi-gestation pregnancy, and (4) confirm viability, any of which can influence cell-free DNA screening results * if the final result is: "no result reportable" or "results uninterpretable", the pregnancy is at higher risk for chromosomal abnormalities * can detect some microdeletions, less common aneuploidies like T16 and T22, and large copy changes but false positive rates haven't been established (if any of these are detected, refer for diagnostics) * lower PPV rate in younger patients given that fetal chromosomal abnormalities are less prevalent in younger patients (Table 3) First-trimester screening Credit to The Fetal Medicine Foundation * most accurate at 10 - 14 wga (38 - 84 mm CRL) * includes nuchal translucency (NT) ultrasound and serum biomarkers (PAPP-A, and hCG) * PAPP-A = pregnancy associated plasma protein A * hCG = human chorionic gonadotropin * these values are used in conjunction with maternal age, weight, race, number of fetuses, and history of aneuploidy to create a composite likelihood score of common trisomies (T21, T18, and T13) (see Table 2) * NT ≥ 3mm is an independent risk factor for fetal aneuploidies and fetal cardiac defects NT ultrasound alone * NT alone detects 70% of aneuploidies * adds nothing of use to cell-free DNA screening in a singleton gestation * more on first-trimester ultrasound below Fetal anatomic survey * offered at 18 - 22 wga * full head to toe ultrasound assessment of the fetal anatomy * offered to all patients regardless of decisions around 1st or 2nd trimester screening * can identify soft markers for T21 (echogenic intracardiac focus, thickened nuchal fold, renal pelvis dilation, and echogenic bowel) and T18 (choroid plexus cysts) * T18 and T13 are likely going to have major structural anomalies notable on ultrasound; 27% of T21 fetuses will have major anomalies Second-trimester screening * "Quad screen": hCG, dimeric inhibin A (DIA), unconjugated estriol (ue3), and alpha fetoprotein (AFP) * offered b/w 15 - 22w6d * composite score (along w/ maternal data) provides likelihood for T21, T18, and neural tube defects (see Table 2) * some labs offer a triple screen (quad screen without inhibin), but it's not as effective and more costly than the quad so don't bother Combined first- and second-trimester screening * combines first-trimester serum screening, NT ultrasound, and second-trimester serum screening, which improves overall accuracy and detection rates (see Table 2) Integrated screening * first-trimester serum screen, NT ultrasound, and second-trimester serum screen performed and a final score is given at the end * if NT ultrasound not available, lower detection rate than if NT ultrasound were included, but similar detection rate of first trimester screening Sequential and contingent screening * same as integrated, but a score is given after the first-trimester screening so that diagnostics can be provided earlier rather than waiting until after second-trimester screening if risk of aneuploidy or neural tube defect is sufficiently high to warrant further investigation * diagnostics would consist of CVS or amniocentesis depending on timing, though often preceded by cell-free DNA screening How should women be counseled about the risk for fetal chromosomal abnormalities? * use Table 1 to give your patient information about their risk of fetal chromosomal abnormalities based on age, history of prior pregnancies affected by fetal chromosomal abnormalities, and their personal and family genetic history * review all screening methods * don't do both cell-free DNA screening and integrated/sequential screening simultaneously as it's not cost effective and you won't know what to do with discordant results What if my patient's screen is positive? * well first, remember that screens are not diagnostic tests * give them the composite risk of chromosomal abnormality * false positives on cell-free DNA screening are more rare than other screening methods, but can be seen in the event of mosaicism (presence of normal and abnormal cells in the fetus), maternal malignancy, a duplicated chromosomal region, or in vanishing twin syndrome * refer for diagnostic testing if patient desires to know for sure * even if cell-free DNA screening suggests aneuploidy, diagnostics will help determine if its a trisomy or translocation (important because a translocation can come from either parent and can be passed to future generations) * consider how this information might be important to them What if my patient's screen is negative? * pretty great chance that there is no fetal chromosomal abnormality, but nothing in pregnancy is guaranteed * diagnostic testing can still be offered if patient is concerned, particularly if new findings emerge as pregnancy progresses * cell-free DNA screening has extremely low false negative rate, but can result from mosaicism, low fetal fraction (if performed at * you could offer repeat cell-free DNA screening, but this might delay diagnostics; if ultrasound findings are consistent with chromosomal abnormality, it's probably best to go to diagnostics More on first-trimester ultrasound Cystic hygroma (click image for source) * absence of nasal bone is also a marker for aneuploidy (49% sensitivity, 1% false positive rate) * increased NT is associated with genetic syndromes along with anomalies like cardiac defects, abdominal wall defects, and diaphrag

    42 min
  7. Gestational Diabetes

    11/10/2024

    Gestational Diabetes

    I paired this episode with the 2021 Pinot Noir from Imagery. Five Pearls * Prevention is key. Work on modifying lifestyle well before conception for best outcomes * Sugar is toxic as hell to our vital organs, and our growing baby/placenta are no exception.  * Insulin appears to be associated with the best outcomes compared to oral agents. * C-section for suspected fetal macrosomia is for the birds. * Inducing a woman with well-controlled GDM probably isn’t always in her best interest.  Epidemiology * 7% of pregnancies are impacted by any type of diabetes * 86% of those impacted are the result of GDM * Compared to all other ethnicities, white women are impacted the least * Older age at time of conception, sedentary lifestyle, and pre-pregnancy obesity are risk factors (same risk factors for type 2 DM outside of pregnancy) Maternal complications * 9.8% chance of developing preeclampsia when fasting blood sugar is * 18% change of developing preeclampsia when fasting blood sugar is >/= 115 mg/dL * 17% chance of undergoing c-section with diet-controlled GDM versus 25% if medication is required (9.5% without GDM) * 70% of women who develop GDM will develop type 2 DM within 22-28 years after pregnancy, but this varies by ethnicity (60% of hispanic women who develop GDM will develop type 2 DM within 5 years of pregnancy) Fetal/neonatal complications * Increased risk macrosomia, neonatal hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, shoulder dystocia, and birth trauma * Several agencies have cautioned around the risk of stillbirth, as well, but the data for this is poor at best. Rachel Reed recently wrote a nice blog (rant) about the topic in her newsletter * Linear relationship between any abnormal value on the 2-hr 75-g OGTT and c-section, birth weight >90th percentile, neonatal hypoglycemia, and fetal hyperinsulinemia * Higher risk of your child developing type 2 DM in their lifetime When did GDM screening arise? 1963 This study was undertaken to: “evaluate various methods of screening for the ‘prediabetic state’ which often becomes recognizable during pregnancy.” - Wilkerson et al, 1963 Screening strategies: * 1st trimester: reasonable if there are risk factors or if you live in a city/region with high prevalence * 50-g oral glucose challenge (non-fasted) (two-step) * If negative, repeat at 24-28 weeks * If positive (>130-140 mg/dL), move to 3-hr oral glucose tolerance test (see below) * Straight to a 75-g oral 2-hr glucose tolerance test) (one-step) * Check fasting sugar → drink the drink —> check blood sugar at 1 hr and 2 hr * If either value is elevated, then you have your diagnosis * HgA1C: potentially insightful in 1st trimester but not as sensitive as oral glucose challenge/tolerance test * 24-28 weeks: reasonable to defer in 1st trimester if low prevalence community or minimal risk (and no need to repeat if diagnosed in 1st trimester) * Same options as above * If 1-hr OGC was elevated in 1st trimester, but 3-hr OGTT was negative, you can simply repeat the 3-hr OGTT (100 g bolus) without repeating the 1-hr OGC * 3-hr OGTT (100 g) * Checking fasting blood sugar → drink the drink → check blood sugar after 1, 2, and 3 hrs * 2 of 4 values elevated is consistent with diagnosis (although some have argued that 1 value is sufficient):  * “Although a higher level of scrutiny may be focused on this subset of women, further research is needed to clarify the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with one abnormal value on the 100-g, 3-hour OGTT and whether they would benefit from treatment.” * Glucola has a bunch of junk in it. Fingersticks and CGM are very reasonable alternatives to the sugary drink. Orange flavor from Fischer-Scientific contains artificial food dyes that don’t belong in the human body, especially when growing a baby. If an oral glucose test is preferred, consider Fresh Test instead of Glucola. There is no data to support gummy bears, fruit juice, or any other alternatives. What are some of the risk factors that might prompt early screening: Benefits of treatment * 2005 study out of Australia found that treatment of GDM resulted in less: * Serious newborn complications (composite of perinatal death, shoulder dystocia, and birth trauma, including fracture or nerve palsy) * Preeclampsia (from 18% down to 12%) * Less large for gestational age (LGA) infants (from 22% down to 13%) * Less risk of birth weight being >4000 g (from 21% down to 10%) * 2009 study out of the US found that treatment of “mild” GDM resulted in less: hypertensive disorders, c-section, LGA infants, less babies >4000 g, reduced infant fat mass, and shoulder dystocia (but no difference in their serious newborn complication composite) Treatment strategy * Even ACOG agrees that nutritional and lifestyle counseling is the first line of therapy: * Having said this, I’m not going to reiterate a single ounce of language in ACOG’s PB regarding “how to live a healthy lifestyle” because OBGYNs and those who treatment the Green Journal as the Bible of OBGYN are unhealthy themselves and generally have no idea what they’re talking about * Instead, please refer to the work of Lily Nichols (“Real Food for Gestational Diabetes”) * The gist: * If you are sleeping and recovering well (8+ hours per night), then go hard in the gym * If you aren’t, then focus on restorative yoga, long walks, etc., because regular movement is critical * Increase protein and healthy fats (lose the seed oils and fried food), decreased processed junk * Add in beef liver, eggs, bone broth, bivalves (like smoked oysters), and a quality fish oil (preferably cod liver oil) * Take a walk after your meal * Limit feeding window without decreasing total calories (ex: 8am to 6pm) * Stress mitigation and setting up healthy emotional boundaries * Green tea and cinnamon is easily accessible “foods” to help improve blood sugars * We must take into account socioeconomics, racism, and other structural means of chronic stress that also impact blood sugar levels through the actions of cortisol * Oral medication and insulin are often required after adequate efforts to improve lifestyle * Whichever approach, monitoring blood sugars is important throughout pregnancy (and postpartum) * Postprandial blood sugar goal:  * 1 hr: * 2 hr: * Fasting blood sugar goal: * Review values weekly if unstable, every 2 weeks if stable Oral medication overview * Glyburide: * Not FDA approved for glycemic control in pregnancy * Pregnancy category C * Increases insulin production from the pancreatic beta cells * 2.5-20 mg daily in divided doses * Crosses the placenta (little data on potential for teratogenicity) * Less expensive and less annoying than insulin * Metformin:  * Not FDA approved for glycemic control in pregnancy  * Pregnancy category B * Inhibits gluconeogenesis by the liver * Increases peripheral tissue sensitivity to insulin * Historically used for women with pregestational diabetes or in women with infertility due to PCOS, and they are entering pregnancy already well-controlled through metformin * Crosses the placenta, and there is some concern around potentially teratogenic effects (though this hasn’t seemed to pan out over time) * Started at 500 mg daily for 1 week, then increased to 500 mg BID, etc. (max dose 2500-3000 mg daily) * Careful with kidney disease/insufficiency * Less expensive and less annoying than insulin Insulin overview * Approved by FDA (and preferred by ACOG and the ADA) * Doesn’t cross the placenta * Dose of 0.7-1.0 units/kg daily is sufficient for most women, split between long- and short-acting insulin * Long/intermediate-acting: NPH is most common, but glargine and detemir re on the rise * Can be used in the AM or PM or both (BID) * Short-acting: lispro and aspart are easily accessible and have faster onset of action than “regular insulin” * best if used at time of meal (not 15 min before) Selecting a medication * Insulin versus glyburide versus metformin? * 2014 study that randomized 751 women to metformin (+insulin if needed) to insulin found no difference  * 2013 study compared metformin against insulin ruled in favor of metformin * Meta-analyses in 2015 and 2014: minimal difference in maternal or neonatal outcomes, but the latter found lower rates of gHTN and higher rates of preterm birth in metformin group * 2017 systematic review and meta-analysis: no obvious difference  * 2017 systematic review and meta-analysis comparing metformin against insulin found metformin to be “non-inferior” * Some observational studies have reported higher rates of neonatal hypoglycemia and higher rates of fetal macrosomia * 2017 Cochrane did a meta-analysis comparing insulin against any oral agent and concluded no significant differences  * I hope you get the point…there has been a lot of effort to determine which is better * But there was a massive meta-analysis in 2021 that provides perhaps the best comparison (“the one to rule them all”)  In summary: insulin is probably best. Metformin probably 2nd best. Glyburide last.  Antepartum surveillance in GDM * Weekly or twice weekly NSTs are recommended for any woman requiring medication to manage their GDM starting at 32 weeks (earlier if other issues arise) * Diet-controlled GDM is not associated with risk of stillbirth before 40 weeks, so NSTs aren’t universally recommended, but, if they do start, you can probably wait until later in the 3rd trimester (no consensus) * Because polyhydramnios is associated with poor glycemic control, it has become relatively routine to measure amniotic fluid at the time of NST * If glycemic control has been an issue throughout pregnancy, growth ultrasound should be considered, especially if indicated by fundal height >2-3+ cm beyond gestational age Timing of delivery * ACOG doesn’t recommend delivery before 39 weeks even if a woman is on medication * Induction at 38 weeks hasn’t been found to lower c-section rates (1993 randomiz

    44 min
  8. John Petrocelli, PhD

    10/10/2024

    John Petrocelli, PhD

    I found John through his Ted Talk: “Why BS is more dangerous than a lie”, and I immediately grabbed a copy of his book, read it once, read it twice, cross-referenced everything, and then asked him on the podcast. We recorded the conversation with a live audience of members from both the Clear & Free and Born Free Method communities. John’s research is important. As an experimental social psychologist at Wake Forest University, he helps to clarify why we all have the tendency to opine on every issue under the sun, regardless of whether or not our opinion is informed or utter b******t. Thanksgiving is approaching, along with a presidential election. If your family is like me, there will inevitably be chatter around the election results, for better or for worse. Heaven forbid somebody challenges Aunt Sally on her very passionate argument for why Donal Trump was the better candidate. And nobody would ever dare to criticize Uncle Charlie’s passionate advocacy for Kamala Harris’ plan to ease conflict in the Middle East. And nowadays I pray for the loner who would have loved to see Jill Stein or RFK Jr. as the next president. As the old adage goes…"Don’t talk politics around the dinner table.” But is anything that they are saying true? Or is it b******t? Or is a flat out lie? We are confronted by the same dilemma seemingly everywhere: from medicine, to politics, to environmentalism, to the supplement industry. It’s frankly hard to discern the signal in a sea of noise. In my conversation with John, we go deep on: * the Asche conformity experiments * threats of social ostracism for being a non-conformist * Dunning-Kruger Effect  * B******t in the wine industry * Honing your bullshitter detector * How to reveal b******t when speaking to a bullshitter * Pseudo- profound language espoused by New Agers like Deepak Chopra (with a live demonstration!) * …and much more Most importantly: What is the value in evaluating all of the evidence before forming an opinion? Do you necessarily have to opine every time you are given the opportunity? And how can you gently approach someone who seems to be espousing b******t without calling it for what it is? Other references from the conversation: * Harry Frankfurt, “On B******t” * New Age Pseudo-Language Generator * Why Most Published Research Findings Are False, by Jon Ioanniddis Find John’s website HERE and go read his book, “The Life-Changing Science of Detecting B******t” (also great on Audible) Full notes from the episode are available on Substack Work with Nathan: Beloved Holistics | Born Free Method | Clear & Free | Twins-Breech Medical Disclaimer: Born Free Method: The Podcast is an educational program. No information conveyed through this podcast should be construed as medical advice. These conversations are available to the public for educational and entertainment purposes only. Music provided by AudioKraken / Pond5 Get full access to Born Free Method: The Podcast at nathanrileyobgyn.substack.com/subscribe

    1 h y 55 min
4.2
de 5
324 calificaciones

Acerca de

The institutions and individuals who run the world would like you to believe that you are powerless. That there's nothing you can do to improve the wellbeing of your family. That you aren't smart enough to understand shmancy science stuff. That eating and living well is too hard for most...so why try? That exercising your rights to informed consent and refusal is irresponsible. That having a birth on you terms, in your own home would be incorrigible. That pregnancy is a disease and childbirth is a medical procedure. That your symptoms are "all in your head". That cervical cancer is an inevitable consequence of HPV infection. They're wrong. Welcome to your revolution. nathanrileyobgyn.substack.com

También te podría interesar

Para escuchar episodios explícitos, inicia sesión.

Mantente al día con este programa

Inicia sesión o regístrate para seguir programas, guardar episodios y enterarte de las últimas novedades.

Elige un país o región

Africa, Oriente Medio e India

Asia-Pacífico

Europa

Latinoamérica y el Caribe

Estados Unidos y Canadá