We Love Stoke Lodge is a campaign group in Bristol, and the subject of one of the chapters of the book Our City, edited by Suzanne Audrey. Many of the campaigns featured in the book used WhatDoTheyKnow and FOI to uncover vital information to support their campaigns. Hear Helen Powell describe the group’s experiences of campaigning to save a beloved piece of land for public use, and what they discovered thanks to FOI. If you value the work we do at mySociety, please donate. Transcript 0:04 Myf: I’m Myfanwy Nixon. I’m Communications and Marketing Manager at mySociety. 0:09 Earlier this year, we found out about this book Our City, edited by Suzanne Audrey. Our City tells the story of a number of different campaign groups in Bristol who were all working to make change, and Suzanne got in touch with us, because lots of those groups, when you read their stories, they had used WhatDoTheyKnow, our Freedom of Information service, to help them with their campaigns. 0:33 We thought it would be really nice if we could sit down and talk to some of those people. We’ve spoken to a number of them, and all of their stories are so interesting. 0:41 In this first one, I talked to Helen Powell of a campaign called We Love Stoke Lodge. And Helen had so many interesting things to say, both about Freedom of Information and about campaigning in general. 0:54 Helen: There is so much that we would not know if it weren’t or being able to make Freedom of Information requests. 1:00 My name is Helen Powell, and I am one of the people involved with We Love Stoke Lodge in Bristol. Stoke Lodge itself is a 23 acre piece of parkland, open space, lots of big mature veteran trees on it, and so on. And it wraps around a grade two listed building, which is Stoke Lodge house, but the parkland has for some years been laid out as playing fields. 1:26 Since 2000 it’s been used by Cotham School, which is a school about three miles away. 1:30 We know the people and the stories that tie them to the land, people who have lived in these houses around the field for 40 years: they taught their children to ride bikes and fly kites and play football. 1:41 We know people who learned to walk there again after a stroke. One of my close friends who lost her baby, and she sat under one of the big oak trees on the field, you know, through the time of grieving over that. 1:52 You know, there are so many people who’ve got a really powerful human connection to the land, and it’s just such a sort of core part of the community that allowing somebody else to come in and just kind of swipe it for their own purposes is just not something that the community is prepared to accept. 2:14 The correspondence that we discovered under FOI was the school asking the council to remove curtilage status from the land, which would mean that it could put up a fence without asking anybody, without going through any planning process, ultimately, without even having to get landlord consent. 2:34 For decades, the land had been treated as having curtilage status. Suddenly, it was removed after the school asked for that to happen. Just we all feel this is so wrong. 2:43 You know, the school had been using the field since 2000, got a lease on the basis that it was going to carry on using it in the same way. 2:54 Putting the fence up around the whole 23 acres in the way that they did was basically privatising what is public land. You know, taking it away from the community. You know, it’s not a small thing to say. 3:06 You know, the school wants to be able to have a secure playing field while it’s doing PE — this is not that. This was the school locking it 24/7, and suddenly what had been important open space for the community was not available. 3:21 I think for the school, the land is a commodity. They see it as an asset that they could develop, they could commercialise, and so on. 3:27 We saw somebody else had made a request and, ̶
