35 episodes

Cracking tales of historical mathematics and its interplay with science, philosophy, and culture. Revisionist history galore. Contrarian takes on received wisdom. Implications for teaching. Informed by current scholarship. By Dr Viktor Blåsjö.

Opinionated History of Mathematics Intellectual Mathematics

    • Science
    • 4.3 • 64 Ratings

Cracking tales of historical mathematics and its interplay with science, philosophy, and culture. Revisionist history galore. Contrarian takes on received wisdom. Implications for teaching. Informed by current scholarship. By Dr Viktor Blåsjö.

    The “universal grammar” of space: what geometry is innate?

    The “universal grammar” of space: what geometry is innate?

    Geometry might be innate in the same way as language. There are many languages, each of which is an equally coherent and viable paradigm of thought, and the same can be said for Euclidean and non-Euclidean geometries. As our native language is shaped by experience, so might our “native geometry” be. Yet substantive innate conceptions may be a precondition for any linguistic or spatial thought to be possible at all, as Chomsky said for language and Kant for geometry. Just as language learning requires singling out, from all the sounds in the environment, only the linguistic ones, so Poincaré articulated criteria for what parts of all sensory data should be regarded as pertaining to geometry.

    • 32 min
    “Repugnant to the nature of a straight line”: Non-Euclidean geometry

    “Repugnant to the nature of a straight line”: Non-Euclidean geometry

    The discovery of non-Euclidean geometry in the 19th century radically undermined traditional conceptions of the relation between mathematics and the world. Instead of assuming that physical space was the subject matter of geometry, mathematicians elaborated numerous alternative geometries abstractly and formally, distancing themselves from reality and intuition.

    • 30 min
    Rationalism 2.0: Kant’s philosophy of geometry

    Rationalism 2.0: Kant’s philosophy of geometry

    Kant developed a philosophy of geometry that explained how geometry can be both knowable in pure thought and applicable to physical reality. Namely, because geometry is built into not only our minds but also the way in which we perceive the world. In this way, Kant solved the applicability problem of classical rationalism, albeit at the cost of making our perception of the world around us inextricably subjective. Kant’s theory also showed how rationalism, and philosophy generally, could be reconciled with Newtonian science, with which it had been seen as embarrassingly out of touch. In particular, Kant’s perspective shows how Newton’s notion of absolute space, which had seemed philosophically repugnant, can be accommodated from an epistemological point of view.

    • 30 min
    Rationalism versus empiricism

    Rationalism versus empiricism

    Rationalism says mathematical knowledge comes from within, from pure thought; empiricism that it comes from without, from experience and observation. Rationalism led Kepler to look for divine design in the universe, and Descartes to reduce all mechanical phenomena to contact mechanics and all curves in geometry to instrumental generation. Empiricism led Newton to ignore the cause of gravity and dismiss the foundational importance of constructions in geometry.

    • 43 min
    Cultural reception of geometry in early modern Europe

    Cultural reception of geometry in early modern Europe

    Euclid inspired Gothic architecture and taught Renaissance painters how to create depth and perspective. More generally, the success of mathematics went to its head, according to some, and created dogmatic individuals dismissive of other branches of learning. Some thought the uncompromising rigour of Euclid went hand in hand with totalitarianism in political and spiritual domains, while others thought creative mathematics was inherently free and liberal.

    • 33 min
    Maker’s knowledge: early modern philosophical interpretations of geometry

    Maker’s knowledge: early modern philosophical interpretations of geometry

    Philosophical movements in the 17th century tried to mimic the geometrical method of the ancients. Some saw Euclid—with his ruler and compass in hand—as a “doer,” and thus characterised geometry as a “maker’s knowledge.” Others got into a feud about what to do when Euclid was at odds with Aristotle. Descartes thought Euclid’s axioms should be justified via theology.

    • 49 min

Customer Reviews

4.3 out of 5
64 Ratings

64 Ratings

Mayhemenway ,

Everything you didn’t know you needed plus math

This podcast is so easy to listen to! There is no stress and no nonsense. The topics are interesting and oftentimes funny. The way he explains some of histories “great minds” really makes me laugh!

SGA2M1 ,

Perfect listening

At once highly entertaining and soothing, this podcast is like meditation except that you get to learn something, and have food for thought to chew on afterwards.
Perfect for taking your mind off a tedious task, this podcast explores an important but low profile strand of history that resonates into our contemporary world.

All that, and you don’t have to know any math at all to follow the story.

ShrGuy ,

Plato was a loudmouth?

The pod about the role of diagrams in geometry was quite wonderful, although I get into a bit of trouble toward the end. Woke up family with my laughter at hearing Plato described as a loudmouth. Probably an accurate description, though.

Top Podcasts In Science

Hidden Brain
Alie Ward
Jordan Harbinger
Wes Larson, Jeff Larson, Mike Smith | QCODE
Sam Harris
Neil deGrasse Tyson

You Might Also Like

Breaking Math
Quanta Magazine
Brady Haran
Physics World
Steven Strogatz and Quanta Magazine
Sean Carroll | Wondery