The Harper’s Podcast
Since 1850, Harper’s Magazine has provided its readers with a unique perspective on the issues that drive our national conversation, featuring writing from some of the most promising to most distinguished names in literature–from Barbara Ehrenreich to Rachel Kushner. Listen as Harper's editors and contributing writers take a deep dive into these topics and the craft of long-form narrative journalism. harpersmagazine.substack.com
Unserious approach makes it a tough listen
٢٤/٠٥/٢٠٢١
I am a magazine subscriber and want to be a regular listener. But the loose, chummy, often giggly tone of the episodes detracts from the material for me. It’s not in service of the listener to focus more on banter than the subject. For demographic reference, I’m an older millennial.
Enjoyed
١٠/٠٨/٢٠٢٣
I enjoyed the podcast and found the information truly interesting and definitely worth listening to. Keep up the good work. Stay well, friends. JST-
This podcast could be so much better
١٥/٠٣/٢٠٢٣
I read Harpers regularly, and really like the guests on the podcast. But the uneven, bubbly tone of the host ruins this for me. Why not just have the great Harpers contributors come talk, with a straightforward interview? This is a missed opportunity to be a good podcast, in my view.
Glitchy app
١٩/٠٩/٢٠٢٢
All my other podcast apps play fine, but there is NO SOUND on Harper’s.
You need this podcast!
٢٣/١١/٢٠٢١
A thoughtful, stimulating show. Violet Luca is an excellent host.
Unlistenable
١٨/٠٧/٢٠٢١
Even worse than the disorganized treatment of the subject is the vile vocal fry creaky talk of the guest. Where is the editor, or do these folks think this revival of Baby Snooks is cute? I’ve given this podcasts two tries and that’s all for me! What a shame on such an old and distinguished publication!
Generally good, host oddly exasperated
١٢/٠٧/٢٠٢١
The subject matter and guests are generally good. The host is oddly exasperated during conversations. She often makes the conversation seem unserious to my ear. For reference I’m 41 years old – not exactly a fuddy-duddy.
Thomas Frank
١٦/٠٥/٢٠٢٠
Your best episode.
meh more left wing garbage
٢٤/٠٦/٢٠٢٠
I received a mailer from Harpers that really touted their independent mind set, so I decided to give their podcast a listen to see if was really what they were saying. And long story short, it is not. It is more of the same; Trump bashing, anyone who works for the administration is circumspect. The titles to their podcasts are the only thing grand. Grand titles, content not so much. Meh.
So much potential, but...
٠٨/٠٥/٢٠٢٠
This podcast is mixed incredibly poorly! There are episodes where the host will be heard speaking over the interviewee—not out of a sense of enthusiasm or zealousness—but because the vocals had been accidentally layered on top of each other! Does nobody listen to the final mix before uploading? The interviews the host engages in are pretty softball—your mileage may vary there—but the persistent audio issues caused me to drop this podcast! Ahhh!
حول
المعلومات
- صناع العملHarper's Magazine
- سنوات النشاط٢٠١٨ - ٢٠٢٤
- الحلقات١٨٣
- التقييمملائم
- حقوق النشر© Harper's Magazine
- موقع البرنامج على الويب
قد يعجبك أيضًا
- كتبيتم التحديث شهريًا
- فنونيتم التحديث كل أسبوعين
- فنونيتم التحديث أسبوعيًا
- المجتمع والثقافةيتم التحديث أسبوعيًا
- تعليقات الأخبارمرتان في الأسبوع
- كتبيتم التحديث أسبوعيًا
- فنونيتم التحديث أسبوعيًا
- كتبمرتان في الأسبوع
- سياسةمرتان في الأسبوع
- المجتمع والثقافةمرتان في الشهر
- فلسفةمرتان في الأسبوع
- تاريخيتم التحديث أسبوعيًا
- كتبيتم التحديث كل أسبوعين
- المجتمع والثقافةمرتان في الأسبوع
- فلسفةيتم التحديث أسبوعيًا