S7E9: Mand Modality Preference Assessments among High- and Low-Tech Options for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review with Matthew O’Brien & Joel Ringdahl
Matthew O’Brien & Joel Ringdahl join us to talk about their paper, Mand Modality Preference Assessments among High- and Low-Tech Options for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review. Show Notes Remember to join us on Facebook to suggest articles to review and questions for authors. https://www.facebook.com/BApractice Acknowledgments Host and Executive Producer: Cody Morris, Ph.D., BCBA-D, LBA https://salve.edu/users/dr-cody-morris Assistant Producers Megan Ellsworth Jesse Perrin Organizational Support ABAI https://www.abainternational.org/welcome.aspx Behavior Analysis in Practice Editor, Stephanie Peterson, Ph.D., BCBA-D, LBA https://www.abainternational.org/journals/bap.aspx Music Cruising Altitude by Jim Carr and his band New Latitude http://www.newlatitudemusic.com Link to Article: Mand Modality Preference Assessments among High- and Low-Tech Options for Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Systematic Review | Behavior Analysis in Practice (springer.com) References Adami, S., Falcomata, T. S., Muething, C. S., & Hoffman, K. (2017). An evaluation of lag schedules of reinforcement during functional communication training: Effects on varied mand responding and challenging behavior. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 10(3), 209–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-017-0179-7 O'Brien, M. J., Pauls, A. M., Schieltz, K. M., McComas, J. J., & Ringdahl, J. E. (2023). Mand modality preference assessments among high- and low-tech options for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 17(1), 228–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-023-00829-6 Ringdahl, J. E., Berg, W. K., Wacker, D. P., Ryan, S., Ryan, A., Crook, K., & Molony, M. (2016). Further demonstrations of individual preference among mand modalities during functional communication training. Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 28(6), 905–917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-016-9518-9 Ringdahl, J. E., Berg, W. K., Wacker, D. P., Crook, K., Molony, M. A., Vargo, K. K., Neurnberger, J. E., Zabala, K., & Taylor, C. J. (2018). Effects of response preference on resistance to change. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,109(1), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.308 Ringdahl, J.E., Schieltz, K. M., O’Brien, M. J., McComas, J. Morlino, R. M., Zabala-Snow, K. A., Unholz-Bowden, Emily K., & Girtier, S. N. (2024). Communication modality preference and the social validity of functional communication and man training. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-024-09956-6 Winborn-Kemmerer, L., Ringdahl, J. E., Wacker, D. P., & Kitsukawa, K. (2009). A demonstration of individual preference for novel mands during functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(1), 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-185.