THE MANIFESTO PODCAST

Dominium Maris Baltici Productions
THE MANIFESTO PODCAST

Political projects fÖr the turbulent twentiesTwitter: @TheManifestoPod Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  1. 1 DÉC.

    Ep 60: The Men Who Saved The West - Our New Trumpian Age (Guests: Bard, Beckeld, Schöllhammer)

    The episode centers on a discussion among political commentators about contemporary geopolitical shifts, cultural dynamics, and the role of leadership in shaping the modern West. It positions the 2024 U.S. presidential election as a pivotal event, highlighting Donald Trump’s victory as emblematic of larger ideological and cultural battles. The participants explore the implications of this election for global politics, particularly in Europe, where right-wing movements are gaining traction amid widespread dissatisfaction with traditional governance structures. A central theme is the contrast between the so-called "blob" or entrenched establishment and the rise of populist or libertarian movements. The "blob," characterized as a bureaucratic, self-serving elite, is described as resistant to change and hostile to grassroots political shifts. This tension is paralleled in European contexts, such as Germany and the UK, where populist and conservative parties face institutional and cultural barriers despite growing public support. The discussion emphasizes the role of technology and media in reshaping political dynamics. Trump’s campaign is portrayed as a masterclass in leveraging media attention over financial resources, underscoring the declining influence of traditional mass media in favor of decentralized social platforms. This shift is contrasted with the bureaucratic rigidity of the European political establishment, which is criticized for its inability to adapt to the demands of an increasingly digital and globalized world. The commentators also delve into the ideological currents within the right-wing movements, advocating for a balance between cultural conservatism and pragmatic governance. They argue that humor, relatability, and optimism—qualities attributed to Trump’s campaign—are essential for right-wing parties in Europe to gain broader appeal and counter the doom-and-gloom narratives often associated with political conservatism. The conversation transitions to a broader critique of left-wing politics, focusing on the diminishing appeal of "preaching" or ideological lecturing in contemporary politics. They posit that the left’s reliance on moral superiority and cultural guilt has alienated voters who are increasingly drawn to pragmatic, results-oriented leadership. This shift, they suggest, reflects a broader cultural fatigue with progressive narratives on issues like climate change and identity politics. European political dynamics are examined through the lens of countries like Poland and Hungary, which are presented as models of resistance against the bureaucratic "blob." These nations are praised for their cultural confidence and economic resilience, which stand in stark contrast to the perceived stagnation of Western European states like Germany and France. The discussion highlights Poland’s unique position as a burgeoning center of ideological innovation within Europe. The geopolitical implications of these trends are explored, particularly in the context of U.S. foreign policy under Trump. The participants argue that a robust and assertive American presence on the world stage is essential for maintaining global stability. They view Trump’s "peace through strength" approach as a model for countering threats from authoritarian regimes, notably China and Russia, while fostering economic and cultural renewal in the West. Another significant focus is the role of AI and technological innovation in reshaping governance and power dynamics. The commentators suggest that the U.S. technological dominance, epitomized by figures like Elon Musk, offers a pathway for revitalizing Western leadership and countering the centralized, authoritarian approaches of rivals like China. This tech-driven vision is framed as a critical component of the West’s competitive strategy in the 21st century. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    1 h 11 min
  2. 29 JUIL.

    Ep 55: Will Populism Save The West? (Guests: Alexander Bard, Benedict Beckeld, Ralph Schöllhammer)

    We are here to save the West. We see that politics and the political systems have failed or reached a dead end. But how does one save a moribund system from the grasp of an elite, of institutions and to be frank - a significant part of the electorate that benefits from it? Since 2016 the very word for change is the dread and promise that is Populism. In its promise is a belief that our democracy is not just a finely tuned system and a machine that can, and should be managed, but the ultimate expression of a sovereign people. The challenge is both national and supra-national. For today institutions not only span across countries but engulf entire continents. The whole of Europe and the whole of the West is intertwined in a myriad of ways – through academia, through the media and through law. Populism is often decried by its detractors as mere demagoguery – the dark art of fanning popular unrest or the great unwashed ashes to seize power for the sake of power alone. But if we are to use Populism, what is it that we wish to conjure up? The election of Donald Trump as People’s Tribune in 2016 along with Brexit started the trend of vast numbers of voters breaking away from traditional voting patterns to support radical change. Before any of this, however, ‘populism’ referred mostly to left-wing movements – SYRIZA in Greece and Hugo Chavez in Venezuela come to mind. Are we here coming up against the limitations of this word? Is populism a guiding principle or a political method? The idea of popular uprisings has always been a double-edged sword - the promise of liberation, symbolized in the 1989 great German slogan “Wir sind das Volk!”, but also seen in the violent passions of mob rule, and the corruption historically following in its wake. Are we to condemn Caesar for crossing the Rubicon? Or condemn that arch-populist Pompey for forcing Caesar to do so, while backing a corrupt system? This is a timeless question, and one that shakes the very foundations of the Western world as we speak. There has never been a more apt time to answer them. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    1 h 40 min

Notes et avis

4
sur 5
3 notes

À propos

Political projects fÖr the turbulent twentiesTwitter: @TheManifestoPod Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Vous aimeriez peut‑être aussi

Pour écouter des épisodes au contenu explicite, connectez‑vous.

Recevez les dernières actualités sur cette émission

Connectez‑vous ou inscrivez‑vous pour suivre des émissions, enregistrer des épisodes et recevoir les dernières actualités.

Choisissez un pays ou une région

Afrique, Moyen‑Orient et Inde

Asie‑Pacifique

Europe

Amérique latine et Caraïbes

États‑Unis et Canada