The Non-Prophets

Atheist Community of Austin
The Non-Prophets

And we are The Non-Prophets!... airing on the first and third Sunday of every month, starting at 3:00 PM Central (01:30-03:00 UTC) on our Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/thenonprophetsaca. The Non-Prophets focuses on atheism and the separation of church and state. Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

  1. DOGE: Cut Aid, Keep Billionaire Welfare

    2D AGO

    DOGE: Cut Aid, Keep Billionaire Welfare

    Johns Hopkins laying off more than 2,000 workers after dramatic cut in USAID funding CNN, By Kaanita Iyer, on March 13, 2025 https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/13/politics/johns-hopkins-layoffs-usaid-funding/index.html This discussion delves into the financial cuts at John Hopkins University, following the U.S. administration’s decision to slash $800 million in funding from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). These cuts are set to impact not only thousands of jobs across 44 countries but also critical global health programs, such as maternal health and disease prevention. The cuts threaten projects combating HIV, malaria, and tuberculosis, which disproportionately affect international populations. These layoffs come as part of a broader pattern of attacks on education systems, particularly scientific research, which have been targeted by conservative political agendas. This assault on international health programs is portrayed as hypocritical, especially considering the administration's “pro-family” stance, which contradicts the harm caused to mothers and children worldwide by these cuts. The conversation highlights how such actions harm both global goodwill and U.S. interests, pointing out that scientific research and international health aid serve U.S. self-interest by helping to combat global health crises like pandemics. Additionally, the conversation touches on the broader impacts of these financial decisions on higher education, which is facing cuts and political interference, such as the targeting of universities like Columbia for allowing protests, which further exemplifies the administration’s efforts to control speech and suppress certain viewpoints. The broader theme is one of harmful political agendas being prioritized over human well-being and education, and how these actions have both immediate and long-term negative consequences on vulnerable populations.  The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.12.2 featuring Jimmy Jr., AJ, and Infidel64. Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

    20 min
  2. SCOTUS: Is LGBTQ Suffering a Religious Right?

    4D AGO

    SCOTUS: Is LGBTQ Suffering a Religious Right?

    Supreme Court will hear challenge to Colorado conversion therapy ban Axios, By Avery Lotz, on Mar 10, 2025 https://www.axios.com/2025/03/10/supreme-court-conversion-therapy-challenge In Colorado, a legal challenge is underway against a state ban on gender conversion therapy for minors. The case centers on Christian counselor Kaylee Charles, who argues that the state's prohibition of conversion therapy infringes on her free speech rights. The law, House Bill 19-1129, which came into effect in 2019, was designed to protect minors from potentially harmful practices that aim to change an individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity. The case raises the question of whether this ban is a form of forced religious indoctrination or a necessary measure to protect vulnerable children. AJ and Infidel 64 discussed the issue, with AJ expressing the view that conversion therapy is not about free speech, as counselors are free to discuss various topics but should not force clients to conform to specific beliefs. Infidel emphasized the harm caused by conversion therapy, likening it to other forms of medical malpractice. Both agreed that such therapy is rooted in religious ideologies, and it’s crucial to consider the potential harm to children, particularly when families pressure minors into undergoing conversion therapy. AJ highlighted that conversion therapy is banned in some states but remains legal in others, underscoring the need for broader protections. Infidel and AJ both pointed out that conversion therapy is primarily associated with religious organizations and driven by conservative ideologies that often reject the validity of LGBTQ+ identities. Infidel further criticized the conservative majority on the U.S. Supreme Court, expressing concern that their stance on issues like same-sex marriage and LGBTQ+ rights could jeopardize the progress made in protecting these communities. Infidel concluded by emphasizing the scientific consensus against conversion therapy, which has been shown to harm LGBTQ+ youth and increase mental health risks, including suicide. Both agreed that conversion therapy should be banned and that the focus should be on supporting LGBTQ+ individuals' identities to promote their well-being. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.12.1 featuring Jimmy Jr., AJ, and Infidel64. Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

    19 min
  3. Iowa's "legal" Civil Rights Crackdown

    6D AGO

    Iowa's "legal" Civil Rights Crackdown

    AntiTrans Bill in Iowa Gets Final OK, Despite Protests TIME, By Hannah Fingerhut Ap, on February 27, 2025 https://time.com/7262485/protesters-iowa-capitol-gender-identity/ In this episode, the panel delves into the controversial legislative actions in Iowa, where lawmakers swiftly passed discriminatory laws against transgender individuals. Tracy begins by highlighting how politicians exploit children's vulnerability in political rhetoric, illustrating Iowa Representative Step Holt's swift enactment of a bill removing gender identity from protected classes against discrimination. Signed into law by Governor Reynolds, this bill, effective July 1, sparked immediate backlash and protests. Tracy and Kelley discuss the absurd speed at which such discriminatory legislation can pass, contrasting it with the sluggish pace of justice. They criticize the pretext of bathroom safety and sports equity used to justify the bill, arguing it masks underlying misogyny and misplaced fears of cisgender men posing as transgender women for nefarious purposes. They highlight the hypocrisy and lack of scientific basis in these arguments, particularly in the context of transgender participation in sports, which has been managed internationally without issue for decades. The panel acknowledges the limited effectiveness of existing civil rights laws in preventing such bills from passing swiftly. They express hope for legal challenges despite the conservative tilt of the federal judiciary in recent years. Eli adds that these bills reflect a dangerous trend of legislating from a narrow worldview that excludes and harms marginalized groups, using legal means to enforce societal conformity rather than protect individual...

    22 min
  4. Don't go to Jesus for Medical Help!

    MAR 18

    Don't go to Jesus for Medical Help!

    Oklahoma GOP advances bill letting Christian doctors deny services to patients The Friendly Atheist, By Hemant Mehta, on March 5, 2025 https://www.friendlyatheist.com/p/oklahoma-gop-advances-bill-letting The ongoing discussion centers around House Bill 1006 in Oklahoma, which would allow medical professionals to refuse care based on personal ethical, moral, or religious beliefs. This controversial bill is perceived as a direct attack on individual autonomy, placing people's well-being at risk in favor of religious freedom. The debate escalates into questions about the ethics of healthcare, especially regarding religious objections to certain treatments like abortion or gender-affirming care. Panelists discuss the implications of such a bill, with Tracy arguing that this stems from entitlement and a refusal to empathize with those in need of care. The conversation expands to the broader issue of personal beliefs interfering with professional duties. One panelist points out that if religious beliefs are allowed to dictate medical practice, it opens the door for prejudices based on race, gender, or sexual orientation, which could further harm marginalized groups. There's also the concern that emergency care could be undermined if doctors interpret situations in ways that align with their personal beliefs. The Hippocratic Oath, which doctors take to promise "do no harm," is brought into question. The law's potential to undermine this oath is a serious concern, as medical professionals could choose to withhold care based on subjective ethical reasoning. While some argue that religious freedoms should allow for such refusals, others see this as a dangerous precedent. Emergency situations might provide an exception, but the vagueness of what constitutes an emergency leads to further potential abuse. Ultimately, the bill would create a system where healthcare is treated as a privilege rather than a right, accessible only to those whose values align with those of their doctors. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.11.1 featuring Helen Greene, Eli Slack, Kelley Laughlin and Tracy Wilbert Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

    22 min
  5. A Physicist Rejects the Idea that we Live In a Sim Universe

    MAR 15

    A Physicist Rejects the Idea that we Live In a Sim Universe

    Mind Matters News, January 8, 2023 http://bit.ly/3kwt70G The discussion explores physicist Marcelo Gleiser's argument against the possibility of reality being a simulation. The panelists express skepticism, noting that such claims often rely on unfalsifiable assertions rather than scientific evidence. They critique the logic behind simulation theory, pointing out its similarities to religious arguments—particularly the claim that "we can't prove we're not in a simulation," which mirrors arguments for the existence of God. Teo dismisses the theory as an infinite regress problem, arguing that if a simulation exists, it would require a simulator, which would also need a creator, leading to an endless cycle of simulated realities. August finds the idea intriguing but remains unconvinced without tangible evidence, likening it to the Fermi Paradox, where people speculate about extraterrestrial life without direct proof. Phoebe criticizes proponents of the theory for their lack of critical thinking, comparing it to conspiracy theories like lizard people running governments. The conversation shifts to implications of simulation theory on concepts like free will. August highlights how the idea could challenge autonomy, likening it to debates over determinism. Teo humorously introduces "theocentric theory," proposing that the universe revolves around himself, poking fun at the egocentric nature of some philosophical arguments. Jason performs an experiment by telling everyone to raise their arms, joking that their compliance proves his control over them. Ultimately, the panelists find simulation theory entertaining but unconvincing. They agree that without evidence, it remains speculative fiction rather than a scientific hypothesis. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.10.4 Phoebe Rose, Jason Sherwood, August and Mateo  Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

    14 min
  6. What is Pure and Authentic Faith?

    MAR 14

    What is Pure and Authentic Faith?

    The Times of Israel, By Gabriel Lamza, March 9, 2023, https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/what-is-pure-and-authentic-faith/ Faith is often presented as a virtue, a connection to the divine, or a means of understanding the world. However, in attempting to defend this notion, many religious arguments reveal their own contradictions. One such example is an article that claims the biblical phrase "made in God's image" refers to humanity’s ability to think independently. Yet, this directly contradicts the biblical narrative, which states that Adam and Eve lacked moral awareness until they ate from the Tree of Knowledge, thereby gaining the ability to discern good from evil. If humans were truly created with independent thought, then why was acquiring knowledge seen as an act of defiance? This contradiction exposes the apologetic gymnastics often required to reconcile faith with reason. The article further asserts that faith requires the complete submission of one’s reasoning to divine authority, essentially equating godliness with obedience rather than critical thinking. This idea undermines the initial claim that thinking is what connects humans to God. By its own logic, faith is not a tool of intellectual independence but rather a mechanism for suppressing thought. This is precisely why faith can be dangerous—when belief supersedes evidence, there is no limit to what one might justify in the name of faith. While many use faith for good, history is filled with examples of atrocities committed under divine justification. Adding to the confusion, the article includes a bizarre analogy involving a train and tiny horses, meant to illustrate how humans often misinterpret the unknown. Instead of accepting ignorance as an opportunity for further exploration, the author suggests that one should simply assume an unseen force—God—is at work. This highlights a common problem in religious thinking: the insistence that unanswered questions must default to divine intervention rather than admitting uncertainty. However, just as educating people on how engines work eliminates the need for "tiny horses," education and critical thinking remove the necessity of religious explanations for the unknown. Finally, the article claims that faith is a rational conclusion and that even the most logical individuals will ultimately arrive at it. However, this ignores the fact that many people leave religion precisely because of rational inquiry. The more one scrutinizes faith-based claims with logic and evidence, the more their foundations crumble. The argument that a professor cannot explain their 50 years of knowledge to a child is used to justify the supposed incomprehensibility of God, but this reasoning is flawed. The Non-Prophets, Episode 24.10.3Kelley Laughlin, Lewis, Mateo, and Aaron Jensen Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

    18 min
4.6
out of 5
433 Ratings

About

And we are The Non-Prophets!... airing on the first and third Sunday of every month, starting at 3:00 PM Central (01:30-03:00 UTC) on our Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/thenonprophetsaca. The Non-Prophets focuses on atheism and the separation of church and state. Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

You Might Also Like

To listen to explicit episodes, sign in.

Stay up to date with this show

Sign in or sign up to follow shows, save episodes, and get the latest updates.

Select a country or region

Africa, Middle East, and India

Asia Pacific

Europe

Latin America and the Caribbean

The United States and Canada