Parsha with Rabbi David Bibi

JewishPodcasts.fm
Parsha with Rabbi David Bibi

Join as we explore the weekly parasha from a Kabbalistic perspective and attempt to simplify the secrets of the Torah 

  1. 11월 12일

    The Ashes Of Isaac at The Akeyda - VaYera

    Thisweek we read the Akeydah. The Akeydah or binding of Isaac is something soimportant to us that we recall it in detail in our daily prayers. We alsorecall it specifically on Rosh Hashana and Yom Kippur to protect, defend andstand in merit for us.      Thestory we think we know: Hashem tells Abraham to take Yishak as an offering.They go together to the mount. Abraham binds Isaac to the alter and at the lastminute is stopped by an angel. A ram is offered in Isaac’s stead. Hashem makesa promise to Abraham and they return home.      That’sthe story my 4 year old granddaughter will tell in Parsha with Orly Adele iin amix of Hebrew and English this week. And the story we heard at four is the onewe continue to hear, But there is much more to the story      Manyquestions are asked      Forexample at the end of the Akeyda the passuk tells us      וישבאברהם אל נעריו       Allthe commentators ask. And where was Yishak?      Thereare many Midrashim relating to the Akeyda      Afamous one recalls Satan’s attempt to stop it.     Realizingthe importance of the Akeydah to the future of Benai Yisrael and the merit andprotection it will provide, the midrashim expand on the attempt of the Satan toprevent Abraham and Isaac from going through with the sacrifice.      Whatshould have been an 8 hour walk from Hebron to mount Moriah, became a three-daytrek through impossible conditions brought on by the Satan. He triespsychological arguments imploring Abraham that he could not have possibly heardwhat he thought he heard.   Hecalls him a fool who dreamed up a god who would ask him to kill a son given tohim at 100 years of age. He uses an intellectual quarrel arguing that prophecyis imperfect and there is room for interpretation. He threatens him that hewill be liable for murder.      Whenthat fails, he turns to Isaac and pleads with him to come to his sensesexplaining that his father is certainly senile if he thinks G-d would ask himto sacrifice his only son. He tells Isaac to think of his poor mother. Hereminds him that Yishmael will become the heir in his stead.      Hethen turns to physical impediments including transforming himself into animpassable river. Its only when the two of them attempt to continue onregardless that the river gives up. But does the Satan give up? I would suggestthat he does not and fulfilling his role in challenging man uses even moredrastic attempts.      Thereis the Disney G rated version of the Akeydah where only the ram gets killed(was Bambi G rated) and then there is an R rated version which we don’t usuallyhear about unless we get deep into the mefarshim. This R rated version hasSatan continue his pressure and would come with a warning note for violence.      Ifirst discovered this alternate version about 35 years ago. The Eben Ezracomments on the verse: “And Abraham returned”: He questions that it does notmention Issac …      Isaacis not mentioned because he was under Abraham’s care. Those who say thatAbraham slaughtered Isaac and left him on the altar and following this Isaaccame to life are contradicting Scripture. ttps://www.sefaria.org/Ibn_Ezra_on_Genesis.22.19.1     AndI said to myself what? What is he talking about? Someone says he didn’t stop?Someone says Abraham killed Isaac? I asked Rabbi Abittan for an explanation andbegan delving into the opinion carried not just by one, but we saw, by many andburied for various reasons which later became very obvious.      Butit soon became apparent that this other opinion was not very well hidden. Itwas more about being ignored as it was simply impossible to comprehend and wepreferred to stick with the kindergarten version.     Forexample, in the Meam Loez, a commentary on the Torah written specifically forthe religiously uneducated masses in 1730, Rav Yaakov Culi comments on thissame verse. “There is another opinion that Abraham did be

    1시간 2분
  2. 11월 10일

    The Humility of Abraham VaYera

    We read this week the portion of VaYera. Like lech lecha it is packed with stories and action.  Avraham experienced both humility and triumph this week. After receiving the extraordinary news of a child with Sarah, he faced disturbing news: Hashem planned to destroy Sodom. Despite its values opposing Avraham's teachings – kindness vs. selfishness, faith vs. heresy – Avraham didn't rejoice in Sodom's demise. Instead, he implored Hashem to spare them. “Will You stamp out the righteous together with the wicked? “Perhaps,” he cried “there are 50 righteous men in the city. Shall You not spare the city in the merit of the 50?” (cf. Genesis 18:23-24). But there were not 50, There were not 40. In fact, there were not even 10 and Avraham had no more bargaining chips. Hashem did not spare S’dom. Avraham lost his case.  The Torah tells us  וַיֵּ֣לֶךְ יְהֹוָ֔ה כַּאֲשֶׁ֣ר כִּלָּ֔ה לְדַבֵּ֖ר אֶל־אַבְרָהָ֑ם וְאַבְרָהָ֖ם שָׁ֥ב לִמְקֹמֽוֹ׃ Having finished speaking to Abraham, יהוה departed; and Abraham returned to his place. What does the Torah mean, “Avraham returned to his place”? Where else should he go? To watch the fireworks that once was S’dom? Ohr Hachaim: G'd completed speaking with Abraham He left. The Torah reports that G'd did not even give Abraham a chance to plead further on behalf of a lesser number of righteous people. After all, Abraham said that he had used his final plea. Although the Zohar 1,82 suggests that the righteous is the foundation of the earth, i.e. that a single righteous person could save the rest of the world, this may apply only to an outstanding צדיק.  The doc mentioned  What if lot had gone left and sodom remained for Abraham?  Interesting what the ohr hachaim closes with :  Perhaps if Abraham had lived in Sodom, his presence could have sufficed to save the town. Rabbeinu_Bahya,_Bereshit_18.33.1 One may also understand the word למקומו as “to his customary preoccupation of entertaining visitors and guests.” Having fulfilled this מצוה in respect of the angels who had now departed he went back to his tent to look for other visitors to entertain.  This was Avraham’s central virtue and whenever he was able to practice it he is described as “being in his element”, i.e. במקומו.  Another way of explaining the word למקומו, is “to his regular emotional state.” As long as Avraham had been in a dialogue with G’d he was on a totally spiritual and intellectual level, not allowing for normal emotional responses which are part of the human condition. Now that the immediate benevolent presence of G’d had departed he resumed his customary frame of mind and his approach to matters of a more terrestrial nature.  The word מקומו של אדם “a person’s place,” defines the parameter within which certain people operate, are at home, and where they know their place within the society they live in. I think that this speak tremendous praise for the humility of Abraham.  Ani afar va’efer  Maybe between him and Hashem  But even in his relationship with people  Could have been so haughty I’m the survivor of ur kasdim  I’m the one Hashem speaks with but no  This is not the only time that Avraham returns. At the end of the portion, we read of Avraham’s great faith and fortitude. He is told by Hashem to sacrifice his only son, Yitzchak up on a mountain the Akeida. Unquestioning and determined, Avraham embarks to fulfill Hashem’s wishes.  After his success at the Akeyda  . Hashem promises to increase Avraham’s offspring like the stars, and declares that all the nations of the world will bless themselves by Avraham’s offspring. After the remarkable incident the Torah tells us that “ וַיָּ֤שׇׁב אַבְרָהָם֙ אֶל־נְעָרָ֔יו וַיּ

    12분
  3. 11월 5일

    Navigating The Crossroads of Life - Lech Lecha

    Life isfilled with crossroads. When we come to these crossroads, do we imagine thatwhen choosing left or right, even if the two paths veer only slightlydifferently from one another, do we realize that as we continue in a direction,our choices eventually bring us to totally different places.   Think aboutthe crossroads of your own life ?   Do I go tothis School or that   Do I marryhim or him   Do I go intothis business or that   Do we livehere or there   Each ofthose decisions sets us into a direction which brings us to other crossroadsand other directions.      Think of twolines on a piece of paper which start out together, then one veers one way andthe other, the opposite way. Can they meet again? Maybe? Or they go off thepaper never to see each other again.   One mayrepresent what we could have been had we taken certain crossroads and anotherthe road we actually take.   We canrarely be aware of the absolute consequences of each of those decisions at thetime we face them. Sometimes we think nothing of it, but that decision changedeverything.   In thetelevision series Star Trek there was something called the prime directivewarning not to interfere in the development of a planet. We see this also inscience fiction with time travel often called a temporal prime directive. Theidea is that one small amount of interference, one seemingly inconsequentialmeddling and redirection can potentially shift an entire society or world intoa different path.   In ourworld, Maamad Har Sinai – the revelation at Mount Sinai was Hashem shifting theworld and its reverberations are still being felt.   Moses tellsus   אֶֽת־הַדְּבָרִ֣יםהָאֵ֡לֶּה דִּבֶּר֩ הֹ’ אֶל־כׇּל־קְהַלְכֶ֜םבָּהָ֗ר מִתּ֤וֹךְ הָאֵשׁ֙ הֶֽעָנָ֣ן וְהָֽעֲרָפֶ֔ל ק֥וֹל גָּד֖וֹל וְלֹ֣א יָסָ֑ף  Rashi: Werender this in the Targum by ולא פסק “and He did not cease”, — as the Gemarahwrites in Sanhedrin: for His voice is strong and goes on continuously   In thisperasha which features the first words from Hashem to Abraham, advice was givenrelating to the path we take in life   Lech Lecha   On Saturdayevening when some went out for seuda shelishi, a few of us began discussing twostatements brought by the Zohar which some can suggest might be among the keyinstructions on living life and dealing with the crossroads we face.  I saw abeautiful statement from Rav Yakov Nagen  He writes:My teachers taught me that the first four parshiot of the book of Bereshit,“Bereshit,” “Noach,” “Lech Lecha” and “Vayera,” are a summarized guide tospiritual enlightenment. From one’s initial phase, “Bereshit,” one must come toa place of “Noach,” a place of calm and tranquility.   From therehe can continue to “Lech Lecha,” the phase of journey. The double language of“Lech Lecha,” “go unto yourself,” teaches that the journey is a journey inward,and through this process a person comes to “Vayera elav Hashem,” the revelationof G-d, enlightenment.   This week,parshat Lech Lecha, we will study the aspect of the journey itself.  The ZoharHaKadosh in one place explains that the double language of “lech lecha” callson a person to embark on a journey into himself: “lech lecha unto yourself…toknow and to fix yourself” (Lech Lecha 67b-68a).   In anawesome teaching in Orot HaKodesh, Rav Kook explains that when a person arrivesat an understanding of himself, he discovers Hashem  Rav Kookexplained that The sin of Adam HaRishon was that he became disconnected fromhis true self. He conceded to thesnake’s advice, lost his self-ness, and was thus unable to give a clear answerto [Hashem’s] question “Ayeka?” “Where are you?” for he did not know his ownsoul, for his true self was lost from him…   Rav Kookmakes a bold and awesome statement – when we seek and find the “I” ofo

    55분

평가 및 리뷰

5
최고 5점
9개의 평가

소개

Join as we explore the weekly parasha from a Kabbalistic perspective and attempt to simplify the secrets of the Torah 

좋아할 만한 다른 항목

무삭제판 에피소드를 청취하려면 로그인하십시오.

이 프로그램의 최신 정보 받기

프로그램을 팔로우하고, 에피소드를 저장하고, 최신 소식을 받아보려면 로그인하거나 가입하십시오.

국가 또는 지역 선택

아프리카, 중동 및 인도

아시아 태평양

유럽

라틴 아메리카 및 카리브해

미국 및 캐나다