Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools, et al.
A case in which the Court will decide whether and when the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) require a student to exhaust his administrative proceedings against the school district when such proceedings would be futile.
Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. United States
A case in which the Court will decide whether U.S. district courts may exercise subject-matter jurisdiction over criminal prosecutions against foreign sovereigns and their instrumentalities under 18 U.S.C. § 3231 and in light of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act.
Santos-Zacaria v. Garland
A case in which the Court will decide whether federal immigration law bars a federal court of appeals from reviewing an immigrant’s claim that the Board of Immigration Appeals had engaged in impermissible factfinding because the immigrant had not exhausted that claim through a motion to reconsider.
Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo, Inc.
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (PROMESA)’s general grant of jurisdiction to the federal courts over claims against the Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico and claims otherwise arising under PROMESA abrogate the Board’s sovereign immunity with respect to all federal and territorial claims.
Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
A case in which the Court will decide whether the National Labor Relations Act preempts a state-court lawsuit against a union for intentionally destroying an employer’s property during a labor dispute.
In re Grand Jury
A case in which the Court was asked to decide whether a communication involving both legal and non-legal advice is protected by attorney-client privilege when obtaining or providing legal advice was one of the significant purposes behind the communication.
Incredible window into the workings of our country.
I find the arguments and questions fascinating. Some cases are sleepers but for big decisions in the news, I always listen. Amazing.
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization 1 Dec 21
Why was this removed from the feed? Seems an important case to have available. Please consider reposting it to the feed.
Love this podcast.