U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Oyez

٤٫٧ (٦١٤)
حكومة
يتم التحديث أسبوعيًا

Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.

١١ جمادى الأولى

NVIDIA Corporation v. E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB

A case in which the Court will clarify the pleading standards to show knowledge or intent for Private Securities Litigation Reform Act claims that rely on internal company documents.

١ س ٢٧ د
١٠ جمادى الأولى

Delligatti v. United States

A case in which the Court will decide whether a crime that requires proof of bodily injury or death, but can be committed by failing to take action, has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force.

١ س ٣ د
١٠ جمادى الأولى

Velazquez v. Garland

A case in which the Court will decide whether, when a noncitizen's voluntary-departure period ends on a weekend or public holiday, a motion to reopen filed the next business day is sufficient to avoid the penalties for failure to depart under 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(d)(1).

١ س ٧ د
٤ جمادى الأولى

Facebook v. Amalgamated Bank

A case in which the Court will decide whether risk disclosures are false or misleading when they do not disclose that a risk has materialized in the past, even if that past event presents no known risk of ongoing or future business harm.

١ س ٤٤ د
٣ جمادى الأولى

Advocate Christ Medical Center v. Becerra

A case in which the Court will decide whether the phrase “entitled… to benefits” includes all who meet basic program eligibility criteria, whether or not benefits are actually received.

١ س ١٠ د
٣ جمادى الأولى

E.M.D. Sales, Inc. v. Carrera

A case in which the Court will decide whether the burden of proof that employers must satisfy to demonstrate the applicability of a Fair Labor Standards Act exemption is a mere preponderance of the evidence or clear and convincing evidence.

٤٢ من الدقائق
٢ جمادى الأولى

Wisconsin Bell, Inc. cv. United States, ex rel. Heath

A case in which the Court will decide whether reimbursement requests submitted to the Federal Communications Commission's E-rate program are “claims” under the False Claims Act.

١ س ٣٤ د
١٣ ربيع الآخر

Bufkin v. McDonough

A case in which the Court will decide whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims must ensure that the benefit-of-the-doubt rule in 38 U.S.C. § 5107(b) was properly applied during the claims process in order to satisfy 38 U.S.C. § 7261(b)(1).

١ س ١٣ د

مشاهدة الكل (٧٢)

٤٫٧

من ٥

‫٦١٤ من التقييمات‬

A Delightful window into the Supreme Court

٢٦ ذو الحجة

GCChaser

This easy to use podcast should be required listening for all Americans. Listening to the oral arguments not only provides an education into how the process works but also provides a view into how the justices approach very complex cases.
Untimely

٦ جمادى الأولى

PuPower

It bothers me that it takes so long to get the arguments. There are other pods that post the next day. Why should I follow this pod.
Simple podcast but exactly what i need

١٩ شعبان

XheanortXIII

Thank you for what you do
I enjoy listening to the arguments

١٣‏/٠٨‏/١٤٤٤ هـ

perdiemmedic

And then listening to companion type podcast who discuss and give context

Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.