We Don't Believe in Beatles

Could be a fun concept for a podcast sadly the dynamic between the hosts prevent the show from being anything more than banal bantering. There's a pretty clear Paul bias to these reviews not surprisingly. Which can be gratting, especially when listening to the reviews of the other members solo work. The segments drag on far too long, from listing that years "top albums" where the hosts will go off on any number of tangents, and to the really obnixous Temporary secretary rating the third host pretending not to know what to do - gag, is really played out. The opinions shared are so perdictable it's as if a semi-sentient Buzzfeed article materialzed as 3 podcasters. The main host gives vibes of Glee school musical director. The third host is a third wheel and his asides "humor???" often derails the show. If I could vote someone off it would be him. The one cohost seems geniunelly interested in the material, in fact he likely was the one who came up with the concept for the show. As the one host with the most Beatles knowledge, it's mostly limited and often they get key points/facts wrong. Spendt 30 minutes talking about mar volta album. Most listeners are less interested in hearing your thoughts on Mars Volta rather than you know maybe the Beatles solo album your meant to be reviewing. After hearing how badly they butcher the solo songs in their outro, I have zero interest in listening to the host's music which they plug shamelessly throughtout the show. They seem to be exhausted and disinterested in their own show at this point. Maybe adding a 4th guest cohost could help the show. But at this point I Don't Believe in this Podcast.

What a joke. They spend half the time revealing they haven’t researched the facts, don’t know the music (Beatles or solo) or just insulting the music. Not super enjoyable to listen to.