23 min
Safeguards for GPs helping patients end their life Oncology Republic
-
- Health & Fitness
By the end of this month, voluntary assisted dying will be a lawful choice for eligible patients across Australia.
However, for many doctors, this end-of-life option is surrounded with complexity and conundrums.
In a two-part series Oncology Republic podcast explores the legislation, support network and personal experience of doctors engaged in Voluntary Assisted Dying (VAD).
This episode we speak with Casey Haining, research fellow in the Australian Centre for Health Law Research, at Queensland University of Technology. She shares the recent changes in legislation.
Ms Haining says that a “particularly prominent legal concern” for many doctors is breaching the Commonwealth Criminal Code by talking about voluntary assisted dying through a carriage service.
“Because of this Commonwealth law there is a bit of hesitation around talking or conducting aspects of the voluntary dying process via telehealth. It is a grey area in terms of the interpretation and different states have interpreted it quite differently,” she says.
Ms Haining encourages doctors to access the Centre for Health Law Research website that provides jurisdiction specific information and provides an overview on other aspects of end-of-life law.
MBS also needs to adapt to the new legislation, Ms Haining said. MBS currently only provides patient rebates for consultations for VAD eligibility. There is no rebate for the actual administration.
“VAD is not a quick process and it takes a lot of time for practitioners. Because this is going to be a lawful choice across juridictions the MBS needs to ensure that people who are dedicating themselves and electing to provide this lawful service are compensated adequately,” she said.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By the end of this month, voluntary assisted dying will be a lawful choice for eligible patients across Australia.
However, for many doctors, this end-of-life option is surrounded with complexity and conundrums.
In a two-part series Oncology Republic podcast explores the legislation, support network and personal experience of doctors engaged in Voluntary Assisted Dying (VAD).
This episode we speak with Casey Haining, research fellow in the Australian Centre for Health Law Research, at Queensland University of Technology. She shares the recent changes in legislation.
Ms Haining says that a “particularly prominent legal concern” for many doctors is breaching the Commonwealth Criminal Code by talking about voluntary assisted dying through a carriage service.
“Because of this Commonwealth law there is a bit of hesitation around talking or conducting aspects of the voluntary dying process via telehealth. It is a grey area in terms of the interpretation and different states have interpreted it quite differently,” she says.
Ms Haining encourages doctors to access the Centre for Health Law Research website that provides jurisdiction specific information and provides an overview on other aspects of end-of-life law.
MBS also needs to adapt to the new legislation, Ms Haining said. MBS currently only provides patient rebates for consultations for VAD eligibility. There is no rebate for the actual administration.
“VAD is not a quick process and it takes a lot of time for practitioners. Because this is going to be a lawful choice across juridictions the MBS needs to ensure that people who are dedicating themselves and electing to provide this lawful service are compensated adequately,” she said.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
23 min