A Normal Family: The JonBenet Ramsey Case Revisited

i revisit this podcast about once a year. the first time i listened to it, i was absolutely blown away by how perfectly this theory brought so many puzzle pieces together that had, for so long, been a complete mystery to me. i can never agree with every aspect of a theory on this case (i mean, who can lol), but this podcast has certainly come the closest. the creator clearly spent a great deal of time carefully researching this case and doing it justice, unlike the many other episodes/podcasts on this case, which all too often leave out an enormous pile of invaluable evidence for the sake of defending the Ramseys or keeping the “mystery” alive, which I feel is incredibly disingenuous and reflective of poor journalism. i also very much appreciate that this podcast looks at the case with a critical eye towards the Ramseys (while still exploring other options in good faith). 100/10 will listen to again.

I listen to a lot of different podcasts and YouTube shows on this case and have several books on it. This, in my opinion, is the BEST analysis on this horrible, tragic case. Unlike some other reviewers, I can tell this host spent a LOT of time researching this case before he came up with his final theory. And the theory that he put forth blew my mind and made me rethink everything I had believed for years about this case. I believe he has gotten as close to the truth about what may have happened to sweet, innocent, little JonBenet Ramsey as anyone will ever get. He sticks with the facts in this case and ignores conjecture and hearsay. I really hope he comes back for a second series. I’m pretty certain he was going to. I would absolutely love to hear more from him!

I liked the podcast. And thought it was really good. But until it got to the Burke theory. I can tell the narrator was biased. He did made good points. But initially he was looking at all angles, but I thought on Burke episode he would shut it down right away without looking more in depth on the evidence. He kept going to the other claims and saying he didn’t think that made sense. I wish he would go more evidence like he did with patsy and Johns. I also wish he would've talked about all the family interrogation videos. And show each one and to go into that angle. Because that’s the most telling about this case. But like I said the narrator is biased. Other then that it was good. Just my honest thoughts.

I really wanted to like this, but the comments regarding the podcast being biased are correct. There aren’t as many facts are the are conjecture.