Apologetics Live

Andrew Rappaport
  • 4.4 (46)
  • CHRISTIANITY
  • UPDATED WEEKLY
Apologetics Live

A live apologetics 2-hour show to answer challenging questions and teach how to do apologetics. It is hosted by Andrew Rappaport.

  1. 6 DAYS AGO

    Understanding Full Preterism: An In-Depth Analysis

    Apologetics Live episode 273 This podcast episode delves into the contentious issue of full preterism, a theological perspective asserting that 70 A.D. fulfilled all biblical prophecies. Our discussion critically examines the implications of this doctrine, particularly its effects on traditional understandings of eschatology and the nature of Christ's return. We engage with Dr. Sam Frost, a former full preterist, who shares his journey away from this belief system and highlights the theological inconsistencies he encountered. Throughout the dialogue, we challenge the notion that all prophetic events have already transpired and explore the ramifications of such a view on Christian doctrine, including the concepts of resurrection and sin. The conversation aims to clarify these complex issues while inviting listeners to reflect on their theological positions. Takeaways: Andrew Rapaport articulates the purpose of the show, emphasizing its role in addressing challenging inquiries regarding God and biblical interpretations. The discussion includes an exploration of full preterism, examining its tenets and the arguments for and against this eschatological position. Listeners are encouraged to engage with the hosts and participate in debates, particularly those with contrary preterism views. The dialogue reveals the hosts' personal experiences and thoughts on various theological perspectives, showcasing their commitment to rigorous debate. The episode underscores the importance of understanding differing theological positions while maintaining civil discourse within the Christian community. This podcast is a ministry of Striving for Eternity and all our resources Listen to other podcasts on the Christian Podcast Community Support Striving for Eternity Give us your feedback, email us info@StrivingForEternity.com Write us a review and tell us how we are doing. Sponsors: Squirrelly Joe’s Coffee use the code SFEfor 20% off your purchase Logos Bible Software MyPillow or call (800) 873-0176 and use promo SFE

    2h 6m

  2. JAN 24

    Dueling Perspectives: A Progressive Christian vs. Nationalism

    The discussion centers on the complex and often contentious topic of Christian nationalism, exploring whether it is beneficial or detrimental to society. The participants engage in a lively debate about the implications of aligning faith with national identity, addressing the historical and cultural contexts of this movement. Key arguments include the interpretation of scripture, the role of love and justice in faith, and the criticisms surrounding the application of biblical principles to modern governance. The conversation also touches on personal beliefs, hermeneutics, and the potential dangers of misrepresenting religious views. Throughout the episode, the speakers emphasize the importance of understanding different interpretations and the necessity of respectful dialogue in addressing controversial issues. Takeaways: The debate around Christian nationalism often invokes historical contexts and cultural interpretations. Tim Whitaker argues that Jesus's teachings emphasize love and humility over political power. The distinction between cultural influence and biblical interpretation is crucial in apologetics. Understanding scripture requires recognizing the historical context in which it was written. The conversation highlighted the complexities of defining and understanding Christian nationalism today. Different interpretations of the Bible can lead to vastly different theological conclusions. Links referenced in this episode: Debate: Does Christian Nationalism help society? New Evangelicals vs Kenton Littleapologeticslive.comevermindministries.comgivesendgo.comstrivingforeternity.orgdeadmanwalkingpodcast.comcalebgordon.org Companies mentioned in this episode: Squirrelly Joe's Coffee Evermind Ministries Striving for Eternity Ministries Mentioned in this episode: What do We Believe by Andrew Rappaport

    2h 14m

  3. JAN 17

    The Great Ghost Debate: Are Spirits Human or Demonic?

    Apologetics Live episode 271 The podcast features a lively debate on the existence of ghosts, with Daniel McAdams and Matthew McGuire presenting contrasting viewpoints. Matthew argues that ghosts could be the spirits of deceased humans, citing historical and cultural beliefs that support this idea, while Daniel contends that all ghostly appearances are demonic impersonations grounded in a strict interpretation of Scripture. The discussion delves into various biblical passages, including the story of Lazarus and the rich man, to explore the implications of afterlife beliefs within Christianity. Both debaters thoroughly examine the weighing scripture, experience, reason, and tradition in their arguments. The episode offers listeners a thoughtful exploration of paranormal phenomena and the theological ramifications of these beliefs within the Christian faith. The podcast episode presents an intriguing debate on the existence of ghosts, an exploration that intertwines theology, personal experiences, and cultural beliefs. Matthew McGuire and Daniel McAdams engage in a spirited discussion, with McGuire defending the notion that ghosts can be the spirits of the deceased, while McAdams argues that they are merely demonic entities. The episode delves into scriptural interpretations, historical contexts, and the implications of belief in ghosts within the Christian faith. McGuire references various theologians and scriptural passages that, he argues, support the existence of ghosts, presenting a case that acknowledges the complexity and universality of such experiences across cultures and history. In contrast, McAdams counters with a firm stance that the Bible does not support the existence of ghosts, emphasizing that upon death, the spirit of a believer goes to be with the Lord, while the spirit of an unbeliever goes to a place of torment. He articulates the risks associated with believing in ghosts, warning against the dangers of attributing spiritual experiences to anything other than demonic influences. The debate is marked by a respectful exchange of ideas, where both debaters articulate their positions with conviction and clarity. As the conversation unfolds, listeners are invited to reflect on their beliefs about the supernatural and the afterlife, leaving them with thought-provoking questions about the nature of existence beyond death. Takeaways: The debate centers around whether ghosts can be the spirits of deceased humans or are solely demonic entities. Daniel asserts that Scripture does not support the idea of lingering spirits after death, emphasizing the finality of death. Matthew argues that various cultural beliefs about ghosts suggest a universal human experience that warrants consideration. The discussion highlights the need for discernment when encountering paranormal phenomena, as they may be deceptive. Both debaters agree that personal experiences should not override biblical teachings in understanding the spiritual realm. The conversation touches on the historical context of how different cultures view the existence of ghosts, providing insight into the debate. Resources mentioned: Their first debate: The Paranormal Debate Matt's notes: Are Ghosts Former Humans or Demons? Matt's book: A Magical World Daniel's ministry: Six-Twelve Ministries Daniel's book: Biblical

    2h 43m

  4. JAN 10

    Divine Debates: Unpacking the Tough Questions of Faith

    Apologetics Live episode 270 This episode of Apologetics Live dives into the multifaceted nature of truth, exploring its divisive characteristics and its implications in both personal belief and societal norms. The co-hosts engage in a thought-provoking discussion about whether truth is absolute or relative, emphasizing the importance of a biblical standard in defining truth. They tackle challenging questions such as the role of women in church worship, the ethics of blood transfusions, and the implications of sin in the life of a Christian. The conversation highlights the necessity of adhering to scriptural teachings while navigating contemporary issues, all while reinforcing the core tenet that salvation and righteousness come solely through Christ. Listeners are encouraged to reflect on their own beliefs and the role of their local church in their spiritual growth. Takeaways: The podcast discusses the importance of addressing tough questions related to faith in Christ. Truth can be divisive, especially when it challenges individuals' personal beliefs and lifestyles. Christians should focus on their local church and the teachings of their pastors. The significance of understanding that all sin ultimately leads to death and separation from God. Biblical teaching emphasizes the need for men to lead in worship and teaching roles. Women's roles in the church should focus on discipleship and teaching other women. This podcast is a ministry of Striving for Eternity and all our resources Listen to other podcasts on the Christian Podcast Community Support Striving for Eternity Give us your feedback, email us info@StrivingForEternity.com Write us a review and tell us how we are doing. Sponsors: Squirrelly Joe’s Coffee use the code SFEfor 20% off your purchase Logos Bible Software MyPillow or call (800) 873-0176 and use promo SFE Mentioned in this episode: What do We Believe by Andrew Rappaport

    2h 5m

  5. 12/20/2024

    From Nomads to Cults: The Journey of Tony Miano and GFC

    The discussion dives deep into the contentious dynamics within Grace Fellowship Church (GFC) and the implications of its leadership's practices, particularly under Mike Reed. The episode highlights the alarming patterns of spiritual abuse and authoritarianism that have emerged, drawing parallels to previous critiques of other groups, such as the Church of Wells. Kevin Yount shares his personal experiences and observations, emphasizing the detrimental impact of legalism and the lack of genuine accountability within GFC. The hosts explore how Tony Miano, a prominent figure in street evangelism, has navigated these turbulent waters, often dismissing valid concerns raised by others. This dialogue not only seeks to expose the troubling behaviors within GFC but also aims to encourage accountability and transparency in church leadership. The podcast episode delves into the contentious topic of accountability within church leadership, focusing particularly on Tony Miano and his association with Grace Fellowship Church (GFC). A significant portion of the discussion centers around the implications of pastoral authority and the culture of submission that can emerge within evangelical communities. The hosts critically analyze Miano's recent sermon where he accuses critics of being 'wolves' and discusses the toxic dynamics that can arise when leaders claim exclusive authority over the spiritual lives of their congregants. This leads to an exploration of the psychological and emotional toll that authoritarian church environments can have on individuals, prompting a broader conversation about the need for transparency and genuine accountability among church leaders. Listeners are invited to consider the impact of Miano's rhetoric on his followers and the broader implications of his claims regarding evangelism and church membership. The episode highlights testimonies from former members of GFC who describe their experiences of spiritual abuse, emphasizing the necessity of creating spaces where dissent is not only tolerated but welcomed. By examining Miano's past and present statements, the hosts illustrate how his narrative has shifted over time, raising critical questions about integrity in church leadership and the importance of fostering a culture of open dialogue rather than fear. As the episode unfolds, the discussion touches upon the broader evangelical landscape, scrutinizing how the issues faced at GFC reflect larger trends within contemporary Christianity. The hosts encourage listeners to reflect on their own church experiences and the importance of accountability, urging a collective move towards healthier church dynamics that prioritize the well-being of all congregants over the preservation of leadership power. Takeaways: The podcast highlights the dangers of authoritarian church structures and spiritual abuse. Tony Miano's claims of being attacked by wolves contradict his own history of accountability. Tony's transition from one church to another reflects a pattern of seeking validation. The importance of church community and accountability is emphasized as essential for evangelists. The episode critiques the tendency of some churches to impose legalistic standards on their members. Articles mentioned: The Evangelist's Responsibility to the Local Church The Dangerous Doctrines of Grace Fellowship Church Open Air Preacher Profile of Tony Miano | Every Evangelist Should Belong to a Church a...

    2h 45m

  6. 12/13/2024

    Did the Roman Catholic Church Give us the Bible?

    The discussion centers around the contentious question of whether the Roman Catholic Church is responsible for giving us the Bible. Sebastian, a traditional Roman Catholic, argues that the Church's authority is essential in determining the canon of scripture, while Andrew contends that the Bible, particularly the Old Testament, was recognized as scripture long before the establishment of the Catholic Church. The conversation dives into the historical context of biblical interpretation, the role of church councils, and the implications of oral tradition. Tensions rise as both speakers grapple with definitions of faith and grace, contrasting Catholic and Protestant beliefs. Ultimately, the episode highlights the ongoing debate over the authority of tradition versus scripture in defining what constitutes the Christian faith. Engaging in a thought-provoking debate, the participants tackle the fundamental question of whether the Roman Catholic Church can claim to have given the Bible to believers. Andrew argues passionately that the Old Testament was recognized as scripture long before the existence of the Catholic Church, emphasizing that the authority of scripture is inherent in the texts themselves, not in any institutional endorsement. He highlights that Genesis, for instance, was accepted as part of the biblical canon by the early Jewish community, thus negating the Catholic Church's claim of being the sole arbiter of scripture. Sebastian counters this viewpoint by asserting the necessity of the Church's role in canonization, positing that the Church's historical authority is essential for maintaining the integrity of the biblical texts. The discussion evolves as both parties delve into the implications of their perspectives on salvation and the role of tradition. This spirited back-and-forth not only highlights the theological divide between Protestant and Catholic beliefs but also encourages listeners to reflect on their understanding of faith, works, and the nature of divine revelation. The episode culminates in an exploration of how differing interpretations of scripture can lead to diverse expressions of faith, challenging listeners to engage deeply with the questions of authority and truth in their spiritual journeys. This podcast is a ministry of Striving for Eternity and all our resources Listen to other podcasts on the Christian Podcast Community Support Striving for Eternity Give us your feedback, email us info@StrivingForEternity.com Write us a review and tell us how we are doing. Sponsors: Squirrelly Joe’s Coffee use the code SFEfor 20% off your purchase Logos Bible Software MyPillow or call (800) 873-0176 and use promo SFE

    2h 59m

  7. 12/06/2024

    Calvinism vs. Provisionism: A Lively Debate on Salvation

    Apologetics Live episode 267 This podcast episode dives deep into the theological debate surrounding Calvinism, provisionism, and the nature of free will. The conversation centers on the differences between Calvinistic determinism and the provisionist belief that individuals can freely respond to God's grace. Andrew Rapaport and Leighton Flowers engage in a lively discussion, exploring the implications of total depravity, irresistible grace, and the role of human choice in salvation. The episode highlights the complexities of these doctrines, emphasizing how interpretations can lead to misunderstandings between different theological camps. Both hosts aim to clarify their positions while acknowledging the shared goal of understanding God's sovereignty and human responsibility. Takeaways: Andrew Rapaport emphasizes the importance of engaging in discussions without losing patience, highlighting that differing opinions can coexist respectfully. The podcast features a debate on the nuances of Calvinism, provisionism, and the implications of free will on salvation. Leighton Flowers argues that all individuals have the capacity to respond to God's call, despite the effects of original sin. Both speakers agree on the necessity of Christ's sacrifice for salvation, although they differ on the implications of predestination. The conversation touches on the idea that salvation is a gift from God that requires a personal response from individuals. The episode showcases how theological disagreements can lead to deeper discussions about faith and understanding of scripture. Links referenced in this episode: apologeticslive.comstrivingforeternity.orgsquirrelyjoes.commypillow.com This podcast is a ministry of Striving for Eternity and all our resources Listen to other podcasts on the Christian Podcast Community Support Striving for Eternity Give us your feedback, email us info@StrivingForEternity.com Write us a review and tell us how we are doing. Sponsors: Squirrelly Joe’s Coffee use the code SFEfor 20% off your purchase Logos Bible Software MyPillow or call (800) 873-0176 and use promo SFE

    2h 10m

  8. 11/22/2024

    Debate: Is Jesus God or the Son of God?

    Join us for a thought-provoking debate on Apologetics Live, where we explore one of the most pivotal questions in Christian theology: Is Jesus God, or is He the Son of God?   This week’s discussion dives into the biblical, theological, and historical perspectives behind these claims. We will analyze scripture, historical creeds, and how this topic shapes modern Christian thought.   Key Topics: 1.Biblical evidence for Jesus as God or the Son of God. 2.Theological implications of each position. 3.How this debate impacts Christian faith and practice today.

    2h 6m
See All (273)

4.4
out of 5
46 Ratings

About

A live apologetics 2-hour show to answer challenging questions and teach how to do apologetics. It is hosted by Andrew Rappaport.

Information

  • Creator
    Andrew Rappaport
  • Years Active
    2018 - 2025
  • Episodes
    273
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © 2024 Striving for Eternity Ministries
  • Show Website
    Apologetics Live

You Might Also Like

To listen to explicit episodes, sign in.

Stay up to date with this show

Sign in or sign up to follow shows, save episodes, and get the latest updates.
Select a country or region

Africa, Middle East, and India

Asia Pacific

Europe

Latin America and the Caribbean

The United States and Canada