Opening Arguments Opening Arguments Media LLC
-
- News
-
Opening Arguments is a law show that helps you make sense of the news! Comedian Thomas Smith brings on legal analysts to help you understand not only current events, but also deeper legal concepts and areas!
The typical schedule will be M-W-F with Monday being a deep-dive, Wednesday being Thomas Takes the Bar Exam and patron shoutouts, and Friday being a rapid response to legal issues in the news!
-
Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty Guilty and… GUILTY
OA1037
THE JURY IS IN! Opening Arguments is coming at you LIVE AND UNEDITED today as we react in realtime to the announcement of the verdict in People v. Trump--conveniently timed for exactly the time that we had already planned to record this week! We also take a look at the lengthy closing arguments from both sides and Matt answers patron questions about some of New York’s more unusual trial practices before getting into what we can expect next.
We finish out the fun with Thomas’s dramatic reading of Samuel Alito’s indignant, mendacious, and entirely unsolicited response to the Senate Judiciary Committee’s demands to speak with the Supreme Court’s manager and take a moment to appreciate his full-throated defense of a woman’s absolute right to choose (flags).
Jury instructions in People v. Trump
People v. Owens, 69 N.Y.2d 585 (1987)(providing jury with written excerpt of jury instructions was reversible error)
Alito’s letter to Senators Dick Durbin and Sheldon Whitehouse dated May 29, 2024 -
OA Bar Prep with Heather! T3BE26
Heather is back for another bar question! Yay! Except... it's real property... NOOOOO
We only do the question on this one, since we did both the Q and A last time. So, this is just a short little uncharged episode to get us back on track. It also allows me to catch up on Patron thanks!
Note: two new Gavel Gavels are out, with more coming very, very soon!
If you’d like to support the show (and lose the ads!), please pledge at patreon.com/law! -
What an Alabama Judge Is Doing to Some LGBTQ Lawyers Is Horrifying and Needs a Spotlight
OA1036
Two great stories for you today - following OA1034 on how much Alito sucks, the Law Dork himself, Chris Geidner, is on to discuss the flag habits of Samuel Alito, as well as the exclusive story he broke regarding Alito’s stock activity immediately after Libs of TikTok called for a boycott against Bud Light because…transphobia. After we vent about Alito for a bit, Chris walks us through what an Alabama judge threatened to do to a group of LGBTQ+ lawyers and it’s even worse than you could imagine.
Be sure to follow Chris (@chrisgeidner/@chrisgeidner.bsky.social) and subscribe to his Substack to support independent legal journalism!
Law Dork's coverage of Judge Liles Burke's orders out of the US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
If you’d like to support the show (and lose the ads!), please pledge at patreon.com/law! -
Law School Doesn't Have to Suck
T3BE 25
I am pleased to introduce you all to Heather Varanini! In her role as Director of Academic Achievement, Heather spends her days helping students succeed in law school and prepare for the Bar. She's onboard to serve as the Official Opening Arguments Bar Tutor and teach us a lot along the way! In this episode we'll hear more about her journey and the values that she brings to her work; for this week, we do a full Bar Question and Answer to give a sense of what we're in for with her! The traditional staggered Q&A will commence next time! -
Benjamin Netanyahu: International Fugitive?
OA1035
A second Alito flag has hit the news, we have election results out of Fulton County, and the jury is nearly out in Donald Trump’s New York criminal trial. Matt also answers patron questions about how things could go wrong with the jury between now and the verdict, as well as why juries everywhere are so rarely sequestered anymore.
After a brief detour past a very important class-action suit against Hershey’s for the insufficient jauntiness of its Halloween candy, we turn to our main story: International Criminal Court prosecutor Karim Khan’s application for arrest warrants to be issued against leaders of both Hamas and Israel. How does The Hague have jurisdiction to prosecute the prime minister of a country which has flatly refused to recognize its authority--or, for that matter, Palestinians who carried out the attacks of October 7, 2023 in the territory of that same country? Matt explains the background and recent history of humanity’s first standing international criminal tribunal as we consider what this moment means for Israel, Palestine, and the world.
Complaint in Cynthia Kelly v. Hershey (Reese’s lawsuit)
ICC expert panel findings re: investigation into “The Situation in Palestine” (5/23/2024)
ICC prosecutor Karim Khan’s application for arrest warrants for leaders of Hamas and Israel (5/20/24)
Christiane Amanpour interview with ICC prosecutor Kamir Khan (5/20/24)
There's a new episode out on www.patreon.com/gavelpod!
If you’d like to support the show (and lose the ads!), please pledge at patreon.com/law! -
Why Is Alito Like This
OA 1034
With the recent news that a sitting Supreme Court justice was publicly displaying support for Trump’s attempted coup in the days between January 6, 2021 and Joe Biden’s inauguration, it’s time to ask: Is Samuel Alito actually worse than our very low opinion of him? Also who could have possibly known that a hard-right Reagan/Buckley conservative who has been publicly advocating for ending abortion rights since 1985 would turn out to be the ultra-right Trump/Scalia conservative who ended abortion rights in 2022? We take these questions on after a quick look at the latest low point in Rudy Guiliani’s long, steep, and often hilarious fall from grace. (N.B.: there’s so much more to talk about here than we could possibly fit into an hour, we didn’t even get to his awful decisions on the death penalty, among many other things.)
Finally, we learn the answer to last week’s T3BE question and consider the multifarious liabilities of stocking a private lake full of piranhas.
Alito’s 1985 memo with strategies for overturning Roe v. Wade
Alito’s 1985 job application to the Office of Legal Counsel
Doe v. Groody, 361 F.3d 232 (3rd Cir. 2004)(Alito dissent in qualified immunity case involving strip search of a 10-year-old girl)
A Tiger on the Court: Sam Alito ‘72 at Princeton, Princeton Alumni Weekly (March 8, 2006)
Justice Samuel Alito: ProPublica Misleads its Readers, Wall Street Journal (6/20/23) (Alito op-ed)
Samuel Alito, the Supreme Court’s Plain-Spoken Defender, Wall Street Journal (7/28/23) (editorial drawn from 4 hours of interviews with Alito)
There's a new episode out on www.patreon.com/gavelpod!
If you’d like to support the show (and lose the ads!), please pledge at patreon.com/law!
Customer Reviews
This is
A very good podcast. I like the trial transcripts. I find it to be coverage not available elsewhere. I sure appreciate the info.
I think I’m Done
I’ve listened to OA for a few years now, but I think it’s time for me to unfollow. Thanks for the many times I enjoyed the content.
Disappointing
Like Matt and Casey, seem like interesting analyses, and definitely a breath of fresh air over Andrew and Liz. Today was my exit point. I fully understand sympathy for Palestinians and pressure in Israel, but Thomas saying that Israel is worse than the leaders of Hamas (not the general Palestinians) is a really gross moral blind spot. I don’t think that there is an inch of depth in this analysis.