132 episodes

From Altruism to Wittgenstein, philosophers, theories and key themes.

In Our Time: Philosophy BBC

    • History
    • 4.6, 521 Ratings

From Altruism to Wittgenstein, philosophers, theories and key themes.

    Rousseau on Education

    Rousseau on Education

    Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss the ideas of Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778) on the education of children, as set out in his novel or treatise Emile, published in 1762. He held that children are born with natural goodness, which he sought to protect as they developed, allowing each to form their own conclusions from experience, avoiding the domineering influence of others. In particular, he was keen to stop infants forming the view that human relations were based on domination and subordination. Rousseau viewed Emile as his most imporant work, and it became very influential. It was also banned and burned, and Rousseau was attacked for not following these principles with his own children, who he abandoned, and for proposing a subordinate role for women in this scheme.

    The image above is of Emile playing with a mask on his mother's lap, from a Milanese edition published in 1805.

    With

    Richard Whatmore
    Professor of Modern History at the University of St Andrews and Co-Director of the St Andrews Institute of Intellectual History

    Caroline Warman
    Professor of French Literature and Thought at Jesus College, Oxford

    and

    Denis McManus
    Professor of Philosophy at the University of Southampton

    Producer: Simon Tillotson

    • 51 min
    Bergson and Time

    Bergson and Time

    Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss the French philosopher Henri Bergson (1859-1941) and his ideas about human experience of time passing and how that differs from a scientific measurement of time, set out in his thesis on 'Time and Free Will' in 1889. He became famous in France and abroad for decades, rivalled only by Einstein and, in the years after the Dreyfus Affair, was the first ever Jewish member of the Académie Française. It's thought his work influenced Proust and Woolf, and the Cubists. He died in 1941 from a cold which, reputedly, he caught while queuing to register as a Jew, refusing the Vichy government's offer of exemption.

    With

    Keith Ansell-Pearson
    Professor of Philosophy at the University of Warwick

    Emily Thomas
    Assistant Professor in Philosophy at Durham University

    And

    Mark Sinclair
    Reader in Philosophy at the University of Roehampton

    Producer: Simon Tillotson

    • 51 min
    Authenticity

    Authenticity

    Melvyn Bragg and guests dicuss what it means to be oneself, a question explored by philosophers from Aristotle to the present day, including St Augustine, Kierkegaard, Heidegger and Sartre. In Hamlet, Polonius said 'To thine own self be true', but what is the self, and what does it mean to be true to it, and why should you be true? To Polonius, if you are true to yourself, ‘thou canst not be false to any man’ - but with the rise of the individual, authenticity became a goal in itself, regardless of how that affected others. Is authenticity about creating yourself throughout your life, or fulfilling the potential with which you were born, connecting with your inner child, or something else entirely? What are the risks to society if people value authenticity more than morality - that is, if the two are incompatible?

    The image above is of Sartre, aged 8 months, perhaps still connected to his inner child.

    With

    Sarah Richmond
    Associate Professor in Philosophy at University College London

    Denis McManus
    Professor of Philosophy at the University of Southampton

    and

    Irene McMullin
    Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Essex

    Producer: Simon Tillotson

    • 50 min
    Aristotle's Biology

    Aristotle's Biology

    Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss the remarkable achievement of Aristotle (384-322BC) in the realm of biological investigation, for which he has been called the originator of the scientific study of life. Known mainly as a philosopher and the tutor for Alexander the Great, who reportedly sent him animal specimens from his conquests, Aristotle examined a wide range of life forms while by the Sea of Marmara and then on the island of Lesbos. Some ideas, such as the the spontaneous generation of flies, did not survive later scrutiny, yet his influence was extraordinary and his work was unequalled until the early modern period.

    The image above is of the egg and embryo of a dogfish, one of the animals Aristotle described accurately as he recorded their development.

    With

    Armand Leroi
    Professor of Evolutionary Development Biology at Imperial College London

    Myrto Hatzimichali
    Lecturer in Classics at the University of Cambridge

    And

    Sophia Connell
    Lecturer in Philosophy at Birkbeck, University of London

    Producer: Simon Tillotson

    • 50 min
    Hope

    Hope

    Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss the philosophy of hope. To the ancient Greeks, hope was closer to self-deception, one of the evils left in Pandora's box or jar, in Hesiod's story. In Christian tradition, hope became one of the theological virtues, the desire for divine union and the expectation of receiving it, an action of the will rather than the intellect. To Kant, 'what may I hope' was one of the three basic questions which human reason asks, while Nietzsche echoed Hesiod, arguing that leaving hope in the box was a deception by the gods, reflecting human inability to face the demands of existence. Yet even those critical of hope, like Camus, conceded that life was nearly impossible without it.

    With

    Beatrice Han-Pile
    Professor of Philosophy at the University of Essex

    Robert Stern
    Professor of Philosophy at the University of Sheffield

    And

    Judith Wolfe
    Professor of Philosophical Theology at the University of St Andrews

    Producer: Simon Tillotson

    • 53 min
    The Fable of the Bees

    The Fable of the Bees

    Melvyn Bragg and guests discuss Bernard Mandeville (1670-1733) and his critique of the economy as he found it in London, where private vices were condemned without acknowledging their public benefit. In his poem The Grumbling Hive (1705), he presented an allegory in which the economy collapsed once knavish bees turned honest. When republished with a commentary, The Fable of the Bees was seen as a scandalous attack on Christian values and Mandeville was recommended for prosecution for his tendency to corrupt all morals. He kept writing, and his ideas went on to influence David Hume and Adam Smith, as well as Keynes and Hayek.

    With

    David Wootton
    Anniversary Professor of History at the University of York

    Helen Paul
    Lecturer in Economics and Economic History at the University of Southampton

    And

    John Callanan
    Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at King’s College London


    Producer: Simon Tillotson

    • 50 min

Customer Reviews

4.6 out of 5
521 Ratings

521 Ratings

omegaxx19 ,

A podcast for thinking people

Melvin Bragg is a host from a different era: knighted for his public radio work, a writer himself, he prepares extensively for each program and holds the guests to a much higher standard than do hosts in almost all other podcasts around these days. Yes he is direct and sometimes rude, probably more so to female guests than male guests (although it’s obvious that some of his favorites are women, eg Angie Hobbes), but at least some instances are actually maneuvers whereby he keeps the guests on topic and in check. The intelligence and articulateness of some of his repeating guests are stunning: I can spend all day listening to Marcus du Sautoy and Ian Stewart on math, Edith Hall on Ancient Greece, or Anthony Grayling on philosophy, and he brings on sometimes independent researchers with extremely unconventional and yet interesting ideas. I take notes on each program as they are so dense in contents. Dislikers can go listen to politically correct hosts politely interview a carefully curated list of racially and ethnically diverse guests (I say this as a colored woman academic), but I take In Our Time with its actual focus on intelligent inquiry and genuine curiosity any day.

Kadence C.M. ,

Insightful and thought provoking.

An interesting intersection of new and old ideas in a time of rapid change. I very much enjoy Melvyn Bragg’s ability to direct discussion and maintain on topic. Well done.
It may be germane to revisit some adjacent ideas to those discussed in previous episodes as the post modern world continues turning to a cadence much more swift than ever before. A revisitation of similar ideas, which will likely evoke complete different discourse, especially, in consideration of the specialist who guest speaks, may prove even more thought provoking. Well done!

BIRehabDoc ,

What about the process philosophers?

Very deeply disappointing that there was no mention of those philosophers who have pushed back against Russell and the logical positivists who push hard on the idea of rationalism and operate very much in the Cartesian tradition that gets constantly stuck in either/or binary paradoxes—binarisms that cannot be resolved in the context of classical logic. You cannot ignore quantum mechanics and the implications of such things as non-locality, the measurement problem, entanglement and, especially, Bohr’s Principle of Complementarity. The area that does directly address are the process/relational philosophers who, very sadly, and very disappointedly, actually, receive no mention whatsoever in this broadcast. Which, I think, is a huge oversight. For example, Alfred North Whitehead incorporated Bergson’s ideas in his speculative philosophy of organism, and the American fsther of pragmatism, a close associate of William James, and re-discoverer of triadic semiotics, Charles Sanders Peirce, insisted on a fundamental temporal continuum as the foundation for his evolutionary process metaphysics and architectonic philosophical system. The field of semiotics and the process of semiosis or signification as the way in which organisms derive meaning from experience also assumes a subjective nature to time which relates to Bergson. The only process philosopher who makes it into the discussion is Deleuze. And Deleuze was one who revives the interest in ‘Bergsonism’ but also links Bergson to Peirce in his philosophy of cinema. The relationship of Bergson to some of the phenomenologists like Merleau-Ponty and Levinas is also unfortunately unrecognized in this presentation. I hope the program may have a chsnce to redress thes oversights at some point to give a more complete and powerful assessment of Bergson’s influence. Much more to say but will stop here.

Top Podcasts In History

Listeners Also Subscribed To

More by BBC