23 min
Papish v. Board of Curators of the University of Missouri, 410 U.S. 667 (1973) Free Speech Out Loud
-
- Education
Legal Question: Whether a university that expelled a student for reprinting an offensive cartoon and a profane article headline in a campus newspaper violated the First Amendment. Action: The Court held that ideas distastefully expressed are not unprotected, that the cartoon was not legally obscene, and that the student’s expulsion was based on content, and not on a valid time, place, and manner restriction.
Chief Justice Burger, joining the dissent, at 11:20
Justice Rehnquist, dissenting, at 13:23
This opinion’s citations have been edited down for ease of listening. For more information, visit our explanation.
For more on Papish v. Board of Curators of the University of Missouri, visit FIRE’s First Amendment Library.
For more episodes, visit thefire.org/outloud.
Legal Question: Whether a university that expelled a student for reprinting an offensive cartoon and a profane article headline in a campus newspaper violated the First Amendment. Action: The Court held that ideas distastefully expressed are not unprotected, that the cartoon was not legally obscene, and that the student’s expulsion was based on content, and not on a valid time, place, and manner restriction.
Chief Justice Burger, joining the dissent, at 11:20
Justice Rehnquist, dissenting, at 13:23
This opinion’s citations have been edited down for ease of listening. For more information, visit our explanation.
For more on Papish v. Board of Curators of the University of Missouri, visit FIRE’s First Amendment Library.
For more episodes, visit thefire.org/outloud.
23 min