Supreme Court of the United States Austin Songer
-
- News
-
Supreme Court Season episodes will include all arguments that occur from October 01st to June/July.
-
Trump v. U.S., No. 23-939 [Arg: 4.25.2024]
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Whether and if so to what extent does a former president enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office.
★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★ -
Moyle v. U.S., No. 23-726 [Arg: 4.24.2024]
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Whether the Supreme Court should stay the order by the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho enjoining the enforcement of Idaho’s Defense of Life Act, which prohibits abortions unless necessary to save the life of the mother, on the ground that the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act preempts it.
★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★ -
Starbucks Corp. v. McKinney, No. 23-367 [Arg: 4.23.2024]
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Whether courts must evaluate the National Labor Relations Board’s requests for injunctions under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act using the traditional, stringent, four-factor test for preliminary injunctions or some other more lenient standard.
★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★ -
Department of State v. Muñoz, No. 23-334 [Arg: 4.23.2024]
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Whether a consular officer's refusal of a visa to a U.S. citizen's noncitizen spouse impinges upon a constitutionally protected interest of the citizen; andwhether, assuming that such a constitutional interest exists, notifying a visa applicant that he was deemed inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(A)(ii) suffices to provide any process that is due.
★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★ -
Smith v. Spizzirri, No. 22-1218 [Arg: 4.22.2024]
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Whether Section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act requires district courts to stay a lawsuit pending arbitration, or whether district courts have discretion to dismiss when all claims are subject to arbitration.
★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★ -
City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. Johnson, No. 23-175 [Arg: 4.22.2024]
QUESTION PRESENTED:
Whether the enforcement of generally applicable laws regulating camping on public property constitutes “cruel and unusual punishment” prohibited by the Eighth Amendment.
★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★