I was a juror on a criminal case. I just want to comment, as a past juror, on the destruction of the murder house. As long as you have a good prosecutor, you don’t need to go to the crime scene to see and imagine the event in your own head. Your own head and thoughts are often better than the actual scene. Just like reading a book and then seeing the movie. The book is always better. I enjoyed this podcast.

I am struggling with the decisions made in editing and airing this podcast. The breathy monotone voiceover is wild. Several episodes completely run aground of any substantive content relating to the case. I got through it up until episode 10, Boots on the Ground — straight up irresponsible and ill-informed tertiary gossip about the case. The way the guest “journalist” discusses the case is disrespectful and vapid, and the show chose to leave it all in. Why? The way she describes the defense attorney’s actions during a pre-trial hearing she attended — making hay out of not being provided certain evidence in discovery, etc — is standard criminal court stuff. She describes it like it’s hot off the press insight into the case. (It isn’t.) Tighten it up, get better experts that have a less obvious boner for serial killers, and respect your audience a little more.

Became uninterested after the top two episodes that actually had to do with the incident the rest have been extended, fluffy, fillers

I enjoy the podcast but lord have mercy… basic words not being pronounced correctly is so aggravating. And the 3-4 min of ads 🫠

I get it. You have to make money. A few commercials or a sponsorship is fine. But this is worse than television. It’s 3 minutes of ads in the beginning middle and end that is way tooooo many.

I appreciate the work that has gone into this podcast and bringing the experts in they did. But the mispronunciation of affidavit, Elantra, and Rader is a little maddening throughout.

This is a solid podcast, but my god edit it down. They spend so much time on things that could be covered in 5 minutes or less. They spend 15 minutes talking about BTK for god sakes. They spend a whole episode basically interviewing one of the students who has almost nothing worth while to say.They waste an entire episode taking about whether or not the house should’ve been taken down. I really would’ve waited until the trial had passed before making this podcast.

I was trying to like this podcast but to be honest- it’s long, drawn out and season 2 episode 6 the interview with the “journalist” did it for me- her voice was fried and just annoying

Am I the only one hearing the host say ‘affadavid’ over and over in this podcast? That, lots of other mispronunciations and the intentionally slow, breathy narration is driving me nuts.

Sketchy episode one is the serial killer expert. He seems very excited and happy and Khalifa that he gets to know serial killers. It’s gross episode episode boots on the ground with the Muslim girl who think she’s a freaking victim because people aren’t gonna like her and her the small town in Idaho we go to you people Giovanni, a large company run by Muslims is in Idaho, Idaho, and then the defamation of Doug Wilson Doug Wilson said one thing about don’t trust with the Moscow police say to you based on his own experience with the Moscow police and now he’s horrible Doug Wilson and his church have zero to do with this murder. Nobody should be talking about doug Wilson. It is nothing to do with Brian Kohlberger and the murder of these four college student disgusting bias against Christianity. save yourself. Don’t listen to this ftom that serial killer expert on. turn it off there.