8 Min.

Bring Back Earmarks? Yes/No‪?‬ Adam Radly

    • Nachrichten

Congress has decided to resume using earmarks. It was always known as "pork" or "pork-barrel spending". The reason it was known by those names is that it involved spending taxpayer money on small, low-priority projects that only matter to one politician. Why was it used in the first place? Why was it eliminated? And why has it made a comeback? 

If you could vote directly on this policy to resume using earmarks in Congress, would you vote for it or against it? 

So what is an earmark? According to this article from CNN:

"Member-directed spending" is just a fancy name for earmarks -- a system by which federal spending in a certain district or state can be appended to legislation as a sweetener for the members of Congress representing those areas.

"Earmarks had long been part of the legislative process as a way to grease the wheel of bill-passing."

"How did it "grease the wheel of bill passing"?  In simple terms, if a particular politician didn't want to vote for a bill, they could be convinced to change their minds by including some additional funding for some small project in their jurisdiction. How and when did this start to change?"

"But beginning in earnest with Arizona Sen. John McCain's 2008 campaign for president, earmarking began to be regarded as a bad thing. McCain was a longtime opponent of earmarks -- known derisively as "pork" to Beltway insiders -- and would regularly call out what he believed to be over-the-top pet projects inserted into bills by lawmakers."

McCain made a big deal out of in his run for President. That's when everybody outside of politics became aware of it and they didn't like it.

Check out the listing for this topic on the One Democracy platform:

https://onedirectdemocracy.com/policy-listings/how-can-we-improve-the-rules-for-the-use-of-earmarks/



---------------------------------------



Adam Radly's TEDx Talk:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7npLVcymHGc



One Direct Democracy

https://onedirectdemocracy.com/



IIMAGINE

https://iimagine.life/



Instagram

https://www.instagram.com/adamradly/



Facebook

https://www.facebook.com/adam.radly.9/



Twitter

https://twitter.com/adamradly



Adam Radly's website

https://adamradly.com/



One Direct Democracy

The reality is that we have reached a point in time in our evolution where Representative Democracy no longer serves the will of the people and technology can solve the problems that made Direct Democracy impractical. 



That's why I created One Direct Democracy. It's a movement for upgrading the global democratic system by taking the power away from politicians and putting it in the hands of the people by using Direct Democracy. 



I've created the technology and a plan for how to make this work. 

Congress has decided to resume using earmarks. It was always known as "pork" or "pork-barrel spending". The reason it was known by those names is that it involved spending taxpayer money on small, low-priority projects that only matter to one politician. Why was it used in the first place? Why was it eliminated? And why has it made a comeback? 

If you could vote directly on this policy to resume using earmarks in Congress, would you vote for it or against it? 

So what is an earmark? According to this article from CNN:

"Member-directed spending" is just a fancy name for earmarks -- a system by which federal spending in a certain district or state can be appended to legislation as a sweetener for the members of Congress representing those areas.

"Earmarks had long been part of the legislative process as a way to grease the wheel of bill-passing."

"How did it "grease the wheel of bill passing"?  In simple terms, if a particular politician didn't want to vote for a bill, they could be convinced to change their minds by including some additional funding for some small project in their jurisdiction. How and when did this start to change?"

"But beginning in earnest with Arizona Sen. John McCain's 2008 campaign for president, earmarking began to be regarded as a bad thing. McCain was a longtime opponent of earmarks -- known derisively as "pork" to Beltway insiders -- and would regularly call out what he believed to be over-the-top pet projects inserted into bills by lawmakers."

McCain made a big deal out of in his run for President. That's when everybody outside of politics became aware of it and they didn't like it.

Check out the listing for this topic on the One Democracy platform:

https://onedirectdemocracy.com/policy-listings/how-can-we-improve-the-rules-for-the-use-of-earmarks/



---------------------------------------



Adam Radly's TEDx Talk:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7npLVcymHGc



One Direct Democracy

https://onedirectdemocracy.com/



IIMAGINE

https://iimagine.life/



Instagram

https://www.instagram.com/adamradly/



Facebook

https://www.facebook.com/adam.radly.9/



Twitter

https://twitter.com/adamradly



Adam Radly's website

https://adamradly.com/



One Direct Democracy

The reality is that we have reached a point in time in our evolution where Representative Democracy no longer serves the will of the people and technology can solve the problems that made Direct Democracy impractical. 



That's why I created One Direct Democracy. It's a movement for upgrading the global democratic system by taking the power away from politicians and putting it in the hands of the people by using Direct Democracy. 



I've created the technology and a plan for how to make this work. 

8 Min.

Top‑Podcasts in Nachrichten

Apokalypse & Filterkaffee
Micky Beisenherz & Studio Bummens
Politik mit Anne Will
Anne Will
LANZ & PRECHT
ZDF, Markus Lanz & Richard David Precht
Was jetzt?
ZEIT ONLINE
Lage der Nation - der Politik-Podcast aus Berlin
Philip Banse & Ulf Buermeyer
POLITICO Berlin Playbook – Der Podcast
POLITICO