Lane v. Franks U.S. Supreme Court 2013 Term Arguments

    • Regierung

A case in which the Court held that a public employee's truthful testimony under subpoena in a trial is citizen speech and thus cannot be used to terminate the employee.

A case in which the Court held that a public employee's truthful testimony under subpoena in a trial is citizen speech and thus cannot be used to terminate the employee.

Top‑Podcasts in Regierung

Science Fiction trifft auf Realität
bpb
Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte (APuZ)
bpb
Dimensionen des aktuellen Rechtsextremismus
bpb
Aus Regierungskreisen - Der Podcast der Bundesregierung
Presse- und Informationsamt der Bundesregierung
apolut: Tagesdosis
apolut
apolut: Standpunkte
apolut

Mehr von Oyez

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Oyez
U.S. Supreme Court Opinion Announcements
Oyez
U.S. Supreme Court 2010 Term Arguments
Oyez
U.S. Supreme Court 2011 Term Arguments
Oyez
U.S. Supreme Court 2012 Term Arguments
Oyez
U.S. Supreme Court 2013 Term Arguments
Oyez