More or Less brings the research to the questions of the day! But you’ve been failing in your analysis. Your expert, university professor champions the idea that it’s not that big! The numbers provided were, the Trump administration says it’s 71B but your expert says a lot of that was refunded so it’s closer to 36B - the show takeaway was Trump is wrong again. More or Less has missed the point. Your program isn’t to split hairs. It should be to help people understand the numbers.
The use the number your expert accepted, 36B.
More or less should have then said: the average grandma may receive 18k annually- 36B is the equivalent of 2,000,000 grandmas not getting paid!!!
Many of the DOGE cuts are tied up in court but 7 million accounts were removed from Social Security and there’s been no outcry of grandmothers missing their checks, why?
Because the closed accounts were predominantly fraudsters? But More or Less didn’t ask this question either. If you are going to help people understand the numbers. Think about the meaning and impact of the statistics.
I’m disappointed, I expect more from More or Less
A later episode shows
More or less has lost its way and can’t seem to follow the numbers anymore. Here they start with water use on site is less than stated and then they say 90% is attributed to the power plant and then it gets complicated. Ground water use is bad but river use at the power station might have little impact but they fail to follow the numbers. When it’s politically convenient they will say it’s false but here with water usage they just give up. Do better.