Law School The Law School of America

Binance Founder Sentenced:

Changpeng Zhao, the founder of Binance (the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange), was sentenced to four months. This sentence followed a multiyear U.S. investigation into Binance.

Binance has been under scrutiny due to its rapid growth and regulatory challenges. The investigation likely focused on issues related to compliance, security, and potential illicit activities within the platform.

Hulu’s Tudor-Era Detective Tale (“Shardlake”):

Hulu released a series called “Shardlake,” based on the books by C.J. Sansom.

The show follows a man dispatched by Thomas Cromwell (a historical figure during the Tudor period) to investigate a murder at a monastery during the English Reformation.

The English Reformation was a significant religious and political upheaval in the 16th century, during which England broke away from the authority of the Roman Catholic Church and established the Church of England.

Meta Faces EU Probe Over Disinformation:

The European Union is investigating whether Meta Platforms (formerly Facebook) failed to tackle disinformation and misleading advertising ahead of EU elections in June.

Meta has faced criticism for its handling of misinformation and harmful content on its platforms. The investigation aims to assess whether Meta took sufficient measures to address these issues.

New Job Scams Target Young Workers:

Fake recruiters are using sophisticated techniques to lure college students and new graduates into job scams.

These scams often involve promises of high-paying jobs, remote work, or career advancement. Victims may unknowingly provide personal information or even pay fees to the scammers.

FCC Fines Wireless Carriers for Sharing Customer Data:

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) fined four wireless carriers for selling access to customers’ location data to aggregators.

This practice raises privacy concerns, as it allows third parties to track individuals’ movements without their explicit consent.

Israel Raises Concerns About Possible ICC Arrest Warrants:

Western countries expressed unease about the timing of any court action against Israeli officials by the International Criminal Court (ICC).

The ICC investigates and prosecutes individuals for genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. Israel’s concerns likely relate to potential arrest warrants issued by the ICC.

Dish Network Bondholders Sue Over Asset Moves:

Bondholders of Dish Network filed a lawsuit over transactions that allegedly moved billions of dollars in assets out of their reach.

Asset moves can impact bondholders’ rights and financial interests. The lawsuit seeks to address any alleged improprieties.

Russian Journalist Detentions Raise Concerns:

The Kremlin is cracking down on dissenting voices over its war in Ukraine, leading to the detention of Russian journalists.

Journalists play a crucial role in informing the public, and their detention raises concerns about press freedom and human rights in Russia.

Auditors Balk at Expanded Role: Auditors, who play a critical role in assessing financial statements and ensuring their accuracy, are currently facing discussions about expanding their responsibilities. Traditionally, auditors focus on financial reporting, internal controls, and fraud detection. However, some proposals suggest that auditors should take on additional roles, such as assessing cyber risk and evaluating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors. These expanded responsibilities would require auditors to develop new expertise and adapt their methodologies. Some auditors are resistant to this idea, expressing concerns about potential conflicts of interest, increased liability, and the need for specialized training.

Iranian Rapper’s Death Sentence: In Tehran, the capital of Iran, civil liberties have been under scrutiny due to a recent crackdown by authorities. One notable case involves an Iranian rapper who has been sentenced to deat

Lecture Outline for Week 4: Perfection of Security Interests

I. Introduction to Perfection

Purpose of Perfection:

Perfection of a security interest is crucial for establishing the legal priority of a creditor over others who might claim the same collateral. This is particularly important in cases involving the debtor's default or bankruptcy.

Perfection ensures that a secured party is protected under the law and can recover the value of the collateral if the debtor fails to fulfill their obligations.

II. Methods of Perfection

Perfection can be achieved through several methods, each applicable under different circumstances and governed by specific rules.

1. Filing a Financing Statement (UCC-1):

Procedure: Filing a UCC-1 financing statement with the appropriate state or local agency is the most common method of perfection for most types of collateral. The statement must include the debtor's name, the secured party's name, and a description of the collateral.

Applicability: This method is used for a wide range of collateral except where possession or control is required or is more practical (e.g., goods, accounts receivable).

2. Possession of the Collateral:

Procedure: Physical possession of the collateral by the secured party or a third party agreed upon by both the debtor and the secured party.

Applicability: This method is typically used for tangible goods, such as inventory, artworks, and documents of title. Possession by the secured party provides public notice of their interest and is often seen as definitive proof of the security interest's existence.

3. Control:

Procedure: Gaining control over the collateral involves different mechanisms depending on the type of collateral. For deposit accounts, control is achieved when the secured party becomes the account holder or when the debtor agrees with the bank that the bank will comply with instructions from the secured party without further consent from the debtor.

Applicability: Control is essential for intangible assets and rights, such as deposit accounts, investment securities, and electronic chattel paper.

III. Duration and Renewal of Perfection

1. Duration of Perfection:

General Rule: Perfection lasts as long as the secured party maintains the status quo—continuing to file the necessary renewals for financing statements or maintaining possession or control of the collateral.

Automatic Perfection: Some security interests may be perfected automatically at the time of attachment—commonly for Purchase Money Security Interests (PMSIs) in consumer goods.

2. Renewal of Financing Statements:

Time Frame: A standard UCC-1 financing statement is effective for five years from the date of filing. It must be renewed before it lapses by filing a continuation statement during the six months preceding the lapse.

Effect of Lapse: If a continuation statement is not filed timely, the secured party's interest becomes unperfected, which may open the door to other creditors achieving priority over the collateral.

IV. Conclusion and Summary

Recap of Key Points:

Understanding the importance of perfection and its role in securing the interests of creditors against third parties.

Knowledge of different methods of perfection and when each method is applicable.

Awareness of the maintenance requirements, including the renewal processes necessary to sustain the perfected status of a security interest.


---

Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message
Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Regulations and Content Guidelines: a. Broadcast Regulations:

FCC The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) oversees and regulates broadcast television and radio in the United States.

Rules govern areas such as indecency and profanity, advertising practices, political advertising, and equal time provisions.

Broadcasters must comply with content guidelines, including restrictions on obscene, indecent, or profane material during certain hours.

b. Content Ratings:

Content rating systems, such as TV Parental Guidelines and the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) rating system, provide guidance on the suitability of media content for different age groups.

Ratings help inform viewers and parents about potentially objectionable content, enabling informed decisions.

Censorship, Obscenity, and Free Speech Concerns: a. Obscenity and Indecency Standards:

Legal definitions and standards for obscenity and indecency can vary across jurisdictions, impacting the permissible content in media and artistic works.

Regulations aim to strike a balance between protecting public decency and upholding free speech rights.

b. Artistic Expression and Free Speech:

The entertainment industry often navigates the tensions between artistic expression and societal norms or government censorship.

Legal protections for free speech and artistic freedom can vary across countries and cultures, influencing the creative process and content distribution.

Compliance with Labor Laws and Union Rules: a. Labor Regulations:

The entertainment industry must comply with applicable labor laws, including minimum wage requirements, overtime regulations, and workplace safety standards.

Specific rules may apply to child actors, stunt performers, and other specialized roles.

b. Union Agreements:

Unions such as the Screen Actors Guild (SAG), Writers Guild of America (WGA), and Directors Guild of America (DGA) negotiate collective bargaining agreements that govern working conditions, compensation, and benefits for their members.

Compliance with union rules is essential for maintaining harmonious labor relations and avoiding potential strikes or legal disputes.

Cross-Border Regulations and International Distribution: a. Import/Export Controls:

The distribution of media content and artistic works across borders may be subject to import/export controls, censorship, or content restrictions in different countries.

Navigating these regulations is crucial for facilitating international distribution and avoiding potential legal or cultural conflicts.

b. Intellectual Property Protection:

International treaties and agreements, such as the Berne Convention and the TRIPS Agreement, establish frameworks for protecting intellectual property rights across borders.

Ensuring compliance with these treaties is essential for safeguarding copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual property assets in global markets.

c. Cultural Considerations:

Different cultural norms and sensitivities can influence the acceptability and reception of media content in various regions.

Localization efforts, such as dubbing, subtitling, or content editing, may be necessary to adapt to specific cultural contexts and regulatory environments.




---

Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message
Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Navigating the Intersection of Intellectual Property,

Publicity, and Privacy Rights

In this lecture, we explore the complex landscape of rights of publicity and privacy, delving into their definitions, legal frameworks, key cases, the relationship between these rights and intellectual property, and the challenges posed by the digital age.

Definition and Scope of Rights of Publicity

Rights of Publicity refer to the right of an individual to control and monetize their own identity, particularly their name, likeness, image, and other personally identifiable elements. This right allows individuals to prevent unauthorized commercial use of their persona. The scope of these rights can vary significantly by jurisdiction but generally covers:

Name

Voice

Signature

Photograph

Other distinctive personal aspects

The right is primarily aimed at protecting the commercial value derived from fame or public recognition, ensuring that individuals can control if, how, and where their identity is used for commercial purposes.

Legal Frameworks and Key Cases

Rights of publicity are governed by state law in the United States, leading to a variety of interpretations and applications. For instance, California has very strong publicity rights that extend posthumously, while other states may have more limited protections or none at all for deceased individuals.

Key Cases Include:

Haelan Laboratories v. Topps Chewing Gum: Established the basis for the modern right of publicity in the United States.

Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.: Affirmed the right of an individual to control the commercial use of their performance.

In other jurisdictions, rights of publicity might be protected under broader privacy laws or specific personality rights legislation.

Relationship Between Privacy Rights and IP

Privacy rights and rights of publicity often intersect but serve different purposes. While privacy rights protect individuals from unwanted intrusion into their private lives and unauthorized dissemination of personal information, rights of publicity are more about controlling the economic use of one’s identity.

Intellectual Property and Publicity Rights:

Publicity rights can often be licensed and assigned, similar to other forms of intellectual property.

The clash between copyright and publicity rights can arise when copyrighted works feature real individuals, such as in biopics or documentaries.

Challenges in the Digital Age

The advent of digital media and technology poses new challenges for the enforcement and conceptualization of privacy and publicity rights:

Social Media: Platforms where personal images and videos can be widely disseminated and commercialized pose unique challenges for controlling the use of one's image.

Deepfakes and AI: Technologies that can realistically replicate an individual’s likeness and voice raise significant concerns for unauthorized uses.

Global Reach: The internet enables the global distribution of content, complicating jurisdictional boundaries and the enforcement of rights.


---

Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message
Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Navigating interactions with law enforcement in public spaces can be challenging and stressful. Understanding the nature of these encounters—whether they are voluntary or involuntary—can significantly impact your responses and how you assert your rights. Here, we’ll delve deeper into these aspects to equip you with knowledge for such situations.

Voluntary Encounters:


Definition: A voluntary encounter is when a police officer approaches you in public and starts a conversation without any legal force behind it. In these situations, you are not detained and have the full right to leave at any time.


Key Indicator: The main characteristic of a voluntary encounter is that there is no restraint on your freedom of movement. You can leave, refuse to answer questions, or even not engage at all without facing legal consequences.


Handling: You can ask if you are free to go. If the officer says yes, you are in a voluntary encounter. You can choose to stay and talk or simply walk away.



Involuntary Encounters (Detentions):


Definition: An involuntary encounter, or detention, occurs when a police officer stops you under the suspicion of illegal activity and you are not free to leave. These are characterized by the officer’s use of authority to restrict your freedom.


Legal Basis: For a detention to be lawful, the officer must have "reasonable suspicion" that you are involved in criminal activity.


Handling: If you’re unsure whether you’re being detained, a clear question to ask is, "Am I free to go?" If the answer is no, you are being detained, meaning you have fewer options to leave and should be more cautious in how you interact.




Definition: Reasonable suspicion refers to a more concrete standard than a hunch but less than the proof required for probable cause. It must be based on specific and articulable facts taken together with rational inferences from those facts.


Examples: An officer might have reasonable suspicion if they observe behavior such as attempting to evade contact, engaging in a non-typical exchange of items that appears secretive, or matching the description of a suspect recently reported in the area.


Implications: If an officer has reasonable suspicion, they are permitted to detain you briefly to investigate further. This can include asking you questions and, in some circumstances, patting you down if they believe you may be armed and dangerous.




Clarity and Calmness: In any public encounter with police, particularly in involuntary scenarios, it's crucial to assert your rights clearly and calmly. This helps ensure that you do not inadvertently waive your rights and makes it clear to the officer that you are aware of them.


During a Search: If you are stopped and the officer initiates a frisk (a pat-down for weapons), you can state, "I do not consent to this search." Even if the officer has the legal right to pat you down for their safety, stating your non-consent can affect how any further legal proceedings might unfold, particularly if anything is found during the search.


Documentation: Whenever possible, especially if detained or arrested, keep a mental note of what was said and done. If you can safely make a physical record or have a witness, these details can be very useful in any legal defense.




---

Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message
Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support

Due Process and Equal Protection: Detailed Overview

1. Due Process

Due process is a fundamental principle in American constitutional law that guarantees fair treatment through the normal judicial system, especially as a citizen's entitlement. It is enshrined in both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. The concept of due process is divided into two main categories:

Procedural Due Process

Definition and Importance: Procedural due process ensures that before depriving anyone of life, liberty, or property, the government must follow fair procedures. This requirement is crucial to upholding justice and preventing arbitrary government actions.

Key Elements: The essential elements include notice (informing the individual of the impending deprivation and the reasons for it) and a hearing (providing an opportunity to contest the governmental action). These elements ensure transparency and a chance to defend one's rights.

Typical Applications: This process is typically applied in cases involving welfare benefits, suspension of licenses, employment termination for public employees, and other administrative actions.

Landmark Case: Mathews v. Eldridge (1976), where the Supreme Court outlined a framework for determining the specific dictates of procedural due process, balancing the private interest, the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the government's interest.

Substantive Due Process

Definition and Importance: Substantive due process protects certain fundamental rights from government interference, even if the procedural aspects are correctly followed. This doctrine serves as a safeguard to ensure that certain areas of an individual's life and freedoms are kept beyond governmental regulation unless absolutely necessary.

Protected Rights: These rights typically include aspects of privacy, bodily integrity, marriage, family relationships, and child rearing. The right to privacy, for instance, includes decisions about marriage, procreation, contraception, family relationships, and child rearing.

Landmark Case: Roe v. Wade (1973), which recognized a woman's right to choose abortion under the privacy rights protected by substantive due process.

2. Equal Protection

The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides that no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. This clause is a crucial element in the fight against discrimination.

Purpose and Scope: The purpose of the Equal Protection Clause is to ensure that individuals in similar situations are treated equally by the law. When state laws or actions differentiate between individuals or classes, those distinctions must have a legitimate and justifiable reason.

Standard of Review: Depending on the nature of the classification, courts apply different standards of review:

Strict Scrutiny: Applied when a law discriminates on the basis of race, ethnicity, or national origin, or affects fundamental rights. The government must show that the law is necessary to achieve a compelling governmental interest.

Intermediate Scrutiny: Used for classifications based on gender or legitimacy. The government must demonstrate that the law is substantially related to an important governmental objective.

Rational Basis Review: Applied to all other classifications. The law must be rationally related to a legitimate governmental interest.

Landmark Case: Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which ruled that racial segregation in public schools violated the Equal Protection Clause, stating that "separate but equal" facilities are inherently unequal.


---

Send in a voice message: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/message
Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/law-school/support