Unbiased Science

Great content! I look forward to each episode

I don’t get it I haven’t had fluoride in my drinking water ever. At 57 years old the only teeth that has been removed was my 4 wisdom teeth. Never a root canal or a crown. So fluoride isn’t needed in one’s drinking water. Stayed away from processed food as much as possible. The studies that fluoride manufacturers paid for we all know how that study goes. Just like the food pyramid what was made with the big food processing companies. Hence processed food is at the top. How stupid do you think free thinkers that ask questions like who backed that study.

I have listened to most of the episodes. Lately I have been feeling like the overall vibe of the show is like one of those “in this house we ….” signs that smug folk put in their front yards. I’m all for science literacy and the topics are indeed interesting. Overall I think the execution is lacking and the hosts aren’t really able to provide interesting narratives or effective interviews at the same level that other prolific science podcasters can. As a layperson who is fairly literate about health and very curious about science, I feel like this one just doesn’t quite pass muster.

I have been listening to hear the views of those who disagree with alternative medicine. While I can take in how they get their view point based on research, I cannot agree with the conclusions most of the time. Glyphosate is not safe, artificial sweeteners do have a negative impact (personal experience), acupuncture is beneficial (again personal experience), birth control has side effects (yep, gained weight and depression myself on all brands), gluten sensitivity is real (the pain and blood with a bowel movement was real until I got rid of gluten-not celiac), leaky gut healing….yep real thing, bringing back some items after taking time to heal it currently, and I could keep going with personal experience. Finding my ND has changed my life for the better. Listening to these supposedly unbiased talks only leaves me to be skeptical when I go for conventional medicine. Maybe they should bring someone one who opposes their views and has a honest debate? That would be unbiased over all, because you could hear all points.